5 5
gowlerk

covid-19

Recommended Posts

A Tale of Two Nations.

This is a VERY instructive read, documenting the difference in outcome between a timely response and a delayed one:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-united-states-south-korea.html

Hundreds more Americans are likely to die of the virus again today. For that, the president bears substantial blame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, kallend said:

A Tale of Two Nations.

This is a VERY instructive read, documenting the difference in outcome between a timely response and a delayed one:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-united-states-south-korea.html

Hundreds more Americans are likely to die of the virus again today. For that, the president bears substantial blame.

"The United States and South Korea confirmed their first cases of COVID-19 within a day of each other, but since then, the United States has registered case numbers in six digits, whereas South Korea has barely cracked 10,000 and has witnessed a slowdown in the rate of infection. South Korea’s COVID-19 mortality rate is one-third that of the United States. And per capita, South Korea has tested three times as many citizens as the United States has—thanks in part to South Korean companies, which produce more than 350,000 test kits per day and plan to increase their output to one million."

"Less than a week after South Korea detected its first case of COVID-19 on January 20, health officials met with 20 medical and pharmaceutical companies to jump-start the production and approval of test kits. After some initial hesitation, the government declared a national emergency on February 23. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump would take three more weeks to do the same."

and on and on and on.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

The qualification "local" was used to point out that the national leadership is not alone in making errors.

Local and state leaders realized their mistakes, admitted them and corrected them.

The Mango Mussolini...
Not so much.

He has yet to admit ANY.

 

Actually, he has doubled down on some of his lies (HCT is a good treatment), and then done a complete reversal on others (he knew it was a pandemic before anyone else).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, RonD1120 said:

What is the attractor energy pattern?

The hate?  The divisiveness; division of society into "us and them?"  From your posts here, you enjoy that sort of thing.  The reassurance that even the unintelligent can be important people?  The validation of white supremacy?  The white supremacist movements were ecstatic when Trump "stood up for them" over Charlottesville.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kallend said:

A Tale of Two Nations.

This is a VERY instructive read, documenting the difference in outcome between a timely response and a delayed one:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/13/opinion/coronavirus-united-states-south-korea.html

Hundreds more Americans are likely to die of the virus again today. For that, the president bears substantial blame.

I ask you this one simle question:

What do you think the outcome would have been if POTUS had ordered something like Martial Law at the beginning of this?

This pertains to the US population's reaction to having their constitutional rights shelved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

Those officials made "mistakes" but what Trump did was criminal . . . got it.

Some of those officials DID make criminally negligent mistakes.  Trump is certainly not alone in that.

Florida did not shut down during Spring Break because they wanted to make money.  The Navy officials who blocked Crozier for getting aid for his men (one of them died today.)  Gov. Reynolds of Iowa, who said “I can’t lock the state down. People also have to be responsible for themselves.” Gov. Hutchinson of Arkansas who said stay-at-home orders were a "misleading illusion."  The governors of the five states that are STILL not shut down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

I ask you this one simle question:

What do you think the outcome would have been if POTUS had ordered something like Martial Law at the beginning of this?

This pertains to the US population's reaction to having their constitutional rights shelved.

"Martial law" would have been ridiculous and unnecessary.  No state has had to institute martial law to get people to stay home.  You're doing the strawman thing again.

What he needed to do (and did not) was:

  • As soon as it was clear that COVID was a potential risk - send teams to China to understand it and start test kit preparation.  (That would have gained us six weeks of prep time.)
  • As soon as it appeared in the US in any significant numbers - shut down schools and shopping.  (That would have gained us three weeks to slow the spread.)

And if he had done all that?  A large number of us would already be back at work.  We'd look like South Korea in terms of virus response, not Italy.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, turtlespeed said:

What do you think the outcome would have been if POTUS had ordered something like Martial Law at the beginning of this?

Strawman argument, nobody was asking for that. All people were asking for was a coherent strategy. You know, leadership.

 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, turtlespeed said:

I really like that quote!!

But perhaps we should place the blame properly.

If your 20/16 prescription of a democrat for president, didn't help your vision of the future, then what are you seeing for 20/20?

Are you a daytime stoner or was this your first attempt at a double entendre? I sure hope no poor bastard is shut in with you during this mess.

FYI, HRC wasn't my prescription she was simply who was on offer against Trump. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, JoeWeber said:

Are you a daytime stoner or was this your first attempt at a double entendre? I sure hope no poor bastard is shut in with you during this mess.

FYI, HRC wasn't my prescription she was simply who was on offer against Trump. 

You are an angry old man, aren't you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
53 minutes ago, billvon said:

"Martial law" would have been ridiculous and unnecessary.  No state has had to institute martial law to get people to stay home.  You're doing the strawman thing again.

What he needed to do (and did not) was:

  • As soon as it was clear that COVID was a potential risk - send teams to China to understand it and start test kit preparation.  (That would have gained us six weeks of prep time.)
  • As soon as it appeared in the US in any significant numbers - shut down schools and shopping.  (That would have gained us three weeks to slow the spread.)

And if he had done all that?  A large number of us would already be back at work.  We'd look like South Korea in terms of virus response, not Italy.

California, Washington & Oregon went "Stay at Home" first. 

There was a fair amount of questioning and concern about it.


But it worked. 

New York waited. And paid the price.

 

Australia, South Korea and Germany chose to attack the issue full force. 
They are already seeing the 'beginning of the end'..

We're just at the 'end of the beginning'.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, wolfriverjoe said:

California, Washington & Oregon went "Stay at Home" first. 

There was a fair amount of questioning and concern about it.


But it worked. 

New York waited. And paid the price.

 

Australia, South Korea and Germany chose to attack the issue full force. 
They are already seeing the 'beginning of the end'..

We're just at the 'end of the beginning'.

Unfortunately C-19 models have difficulty with a couple US variables. Migrant cases moving about from the states holding out from lockdowns. Insufficient testing in some states. trump.

All of which will influence subsequent waves of infections. China is having a new wave now from Chinese returning from Russia.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, billvon said:

"Martial law" would have been ridiculous and unnecessary.  No state has had to institute martial law to get people to stay home.  You're doing the strawman thing again.

What he needed to do (and did not) was:

  • As soon as it was clear that COVID was a potential risk - send teams to China to understand it and start test kit preparation.  (That would have gained us six weeks of prep time.)
  • As soon as it appeared in the US in any significant numbers - shut down schools and shopping.  (That would have gained us three weeks to slow the spread.)

And if he had done all that?  A large number of us would already be back at work.  We'd look like South Korea in terms of virus response, not Italy.

Relax everyone, this will only sting for a second.

The Death Panel Arrives.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

5 5