ryoder

See this:

Just for you, Ron!

"We're ten and one!" LOL!

Agreed. If it had been the first time, there would have been no need for this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965

Here is the clip. I'm not sure it really proves anything incriminating.

I discovered earlier today that there was a way to crack some of the redacted words via a word index at the end of the PDF file. Someone else is already working on it: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2020/10/ghislaine-maxwell-deposition-redactions-epstein-how-to-crack.html

I started skimming through, looking just for retractions. It appears every instance of the name of an underage female gets retracted, which is almost all of the retractions. ETA Looks like the good stuff began around page 72:

Hey, let's not get carried away. M'kay?

I just searched for Clinton and found 4 references to "President Clinton", but it is questions from the attorney, so not so interesting. But I also found there are other names redacted, so my original searches may exist in the original document.

Well, sadly, my searches for Trump, Giuliani, Dershowitz, and Andrew, came up empty. :-(

You can download the PDF and search it, if you don't want to read all 465 pages. https://www.washingtonpost.com/context/read-ghislaine-maxwell-s-deposition-from-april-2016/d838c5e5-fae0-4e97-bfeb-7f478e1fb107/

How difficult can it be to just drop it into an S&P500 index fund, e.g. VFINX?

My new favorite campaign poster:

Dan Rather's comment: The Director of National Intelligence and the head of the FBI held a news conference on Russian and Iranian interference in the upcoming election. It’s critical information everyone should know. But with the highly politicized environment, something doesn’t feel right.

Well, it's the CIA's fault for not telling him he was being targeted by Borat!