2 2
billvon

Russiagate

Recommended Posts

So what? He sounds like a real scumbucket.

 

He may have worked for Obama (and Bill Clinton, too), but what he's getting into trouble for was working for Paul Manafort, writing a report that was a 'whitewash' of a politically motivated arrest and show trial of one of Yanukovich's opponents.

https://www.mintpressnews.com/greg-craig-washington-insider-may-be-headed-jail-work-ukraine/255596/

 

Unlike some folks on here, I don't care which side someone is on. 

If they break the law, they should face consequences. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, rushmc said:

This article says a lot. And I can't help but think of all the useful tools that religiously parotid the lies they spewed

 

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/marc-thiessen-the-trump-russia-collusion-hall-of-shame

it isn't an article, it is an opinion piece. I can't help but think of all the useful tools who cannot tell the difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
3 hours ago, SkyDekker said:

Iit isn't an article, it is an opinion piece. I can't help but think of all the useful tools who cannot tell the difference.

Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for?

 

Never mind,

He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth.

 

No collusion 

No obstruction 

Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions!

And the loosers are poor loosers.   AGAIN!

 

What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term?

 

Prediction

More of the same and worse.

Edited by rushmc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rush, it's the content (and the label on top saying "Opinion") that makes something an opinion piece, not the author. You'll note that article has "opinion" in the upper left hand column.

The NY Times has a whole section devoted to (and labeled as) opinion.

Wendy P.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, rushmc said:

Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for?

 

Never mind,

He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth.

 

No collusion 

No obstruction 

Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions!

And the loosers are poor loosers.   AGAIN!

 

What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term?

 

Prediction

More of the same and worse.

You can't even read the 4 page Barr summary and figure out what it means, so how will you  manage with the 400 page Mueller report?

According to Barr the investigation did not establish that the campaign reached an agreement with the Russian government to take actions to impact the election in Trump’s favor, BUT it states that the campaign  fielded “multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”  Yet Trump and others have repeatedly claimed that they had no contact with Russians, or knowledge that Russians were acting to assist his campaign. Trump and his lackeys are lying (again).  Moreover, the Trump campaign did not bring the Russian outreach to the attention of law enforcement as it should have, but secretly allowed Russia's assistance.

Remarkably, even after the release of the Barr letter — which makes it undeniable that the Russians were  helping the Trump campaign — Trump still denies it.

Also according to Barr, Trump has very definitely NOT been absolved of obstruction of justice.  The absence of an indictment is meaningless when DoJ policy does not allow the indictment of a sitting president.

Multiple senior members of the Trump campaign have been indicted and/or convicted as criminals.

These are facts, not opinions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kallend said:

You can't even read the 4 page Barr summary and figure out what it means, so how will you  manage with the 400 page Mueller report?

According to Barr the investigation did not establish that the campaign reached an agreement with the Russian government to take actions to impact the election in Trump’s favor, BUT it states that the campaign  fielded “multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.”  Yet Trump and others have repeatedly claimed that they had no contact with Russians, or knowledge that Russians were acting to assist his campaign. Trump and his lackeys are lying (again).  Moreover, the Trump campaign did not bring the Russian outreach to the attention of law enforcement as it should have, but secretly allowed Russia's assistance.

Remarkably, even after the release of the Barr letter — which makes it undeniable that the Russians were  helping the Trump campaign — Trump still denies it.

Also according to Barr, Trump has very definitely NOT been absolved of obstruction of justice.  The absence of an indictment is meaningless when DoJ policy does not allow the indictment of a sitting president.

Multiple senior members of the Trump campaign have been indicted and/or convicted as criminals.

These are facts, not opinions.

Spin spin spin

 

Spoiled loosers in concert

 

Another example of useful tools spreading propaganda 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, wmw999 said:

Rush, it's the content (and the label on top saying "Opinion") that makes something an opinion piece, not the author. You'll note that article has "opinion" in the upper left hand column.

The NY Times has a whole section devoted to (and labeled as) opinion.

Wendy P.

Wendy

For two plus years many here repeated the opinions of those on CNN NBC ABC and others

 

Now here is an opinion they do not like.

And it had to be opinion and they had no facts to back up the bs they spewed

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, kallend said:

Which of those FACTS are you disputing?

The ones he doesn't like.

 

Come on professor, like so many Trumpettes, he chooses to believe the narrative he wants to believe. 

Anything he wants to believe is true.
Anything he doesn't want to believe is 'fake news."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/29/2019 at 6:21 PM, rushmc said:

Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions!

And the loosers are poor loosers.   AGAIN!

Yo.  "Loser", not "looser".  Sorry, that hurt my brain.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/29/2019 at 5:21 PM, rushmc said:

Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for?

 

Never mind,

He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth.

 

No collusion 

No obstruction 

Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions!

And the loosers are poor loosers.   AGAIN!

 

What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term?

 

Prediction

More of the same and worse.

Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years. After a while, people get tired of watching bullshit. (shrugs)

Oh, and I get it, some thin-skinned sensitive people don't like my posts. You know what to do. The option is there. BillVon has mentioned it a couple of times.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, BillyVance said:

Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years. After a while, people get tired of watching bullshit. (shrugs)

Oh, and I get it, some thin-skinned sensitive people don't like my posts. You know what to do. The option is there. BillVon has mentioned it a couple of times.

The Mueller report has NOT been "delivered". Bullshit, indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, BillyVance said:

It's been delivered to Barr.

It's all #RIDICULOUSBULLSHIT! :D

Did you actually read what Barr wrote?

Somehow I doubt it.

I know Trump didn't. 
Or at least he didn't understand what it said.

 

Quote

Barr said that the special counsel states in his report that “‘while this report does not conclude the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.”

And somehow, I don't think Cohen, Flynn & Manafort think it was all a "hoax".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
35 minutes ago, BillyVance said:

It's been delivered to Barr.

It's all #RIDICULOUSBULLSHIT! :D

Thought this was funny:

https://twitter.com/MonicaLewinsky/status/1110768987539791872

 

PqstvcgI_bigger.jpgMonica LewinskyVerified account @MonicaLewinsky
FollowFollow @MonicaLewinsky
More

Monica Lewinsky Retweeted Orin Kerr

if. fucking. only.

Monica Lewinsky added,

Orin KerrVerified account @OrinKerr
Imagine if the Starr Report had been provided only to President Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4-page letter based on her private reading stating her conclusion that President Clinton committed no crimes.
10:02 PM - 26 Mar 2019
Edited by DJL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, BillyVance said:

Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years.

199 indictments.  39 people indicted, including 6 Trump insiders.  7 guilty pleas.  2 guilty convictions - one for colluding with Russians.  Years and years of hard time in prison.  More money in fines than the investigation cost to begin with.  Trials in the queue.

Quite a "hoax."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, billvon said:

199 indictments.  39 people indicted, including 6 Trump insiders.  7 guilty pleas.  2 guilty convictions - one for colluding with Russians.  Years and years of hard time in prison.  More money in fines than the investigation cost to begin with.  Trials in the queue.

Quite a "hoax."

Will you quit it with the FACTS - you'll make his head explode. 

He WANTS to believe that a serial adulterer, sexual predator, con-man who cheats his investors and contractors, proven liar (over 9,000 known lies), bully, draft-dodging narcissistic braggart is a great choice to be president of the USA and represent us to the world.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

2 2