BillyVance 34 #4551 March 28, 2019 Yeah, it's hilarious. Plenty more where that came from. Now that the Mueller Report is done, the gloves are coming off. The hunters become the hunted. Next up: The FISAs are getting declassified, and Adam Schiff is terrified. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #4552 March 28, 2019 It may already be starting... The DOJ is filing charges against Greg Craig for lying about his work with Ukraine. He was Barack Obama's former White House counsel. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,341 #4553 March 28, 2019 So what? He sounds like a real scumbucket. He may have worked for Obama (and Bill Clinton, too), but what he's getting into trouble for was working for Paul Manafort, writing a report that was a 'whitewash' of a politically motivated arrest and show trial of one of Yanukovich's opponents. https://www.mintpressnews.com/greg-craig-washington-insider-may-be-headed-jail-work-ukraine/255596/ Unlike some folks on here, I don't care which side someone is on. If they break the law, they should face consequences. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #4554 March 28, 2019 2 hours ago, BillyVance said: It may already be starting... The DOJ is filing charges against Greg Craig for lying about his work with Ukraine. Another Trump associate bites the dust. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4555 March 29, 2019 This article says a lot. And I can't help but think of all the useful tools that religiously parotid the lies they spewed https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/marc-thiessen-the-trump-russia-collusion-hall-of-shame Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,123 #4556 March 29, 2019 1 hour ago, rushmc said: This article says a lot. And I can't help but think of all the useful tools that religiously parotid the lies they spewed https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/marc-thiessen-the-trump-russia-collusion-hall-of-shame it isn't an article, it is an opinion piece. I can't help but think of all the useful tools who cannot tell the difference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,387 #4557 March 29, 2019 WaPo: Mueller report will be delivered by ‘mid-April, if not sooner,’ attorney general tells Congress https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/mueller-report-will-be-delivered-by-mid-april-if-not-sooner-attorney-general-tells-congress/2019/03/29/288a3692-524c-11e9-a3f7-78b7525a8d5f_story.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4558 March 29, 2019 (edited) 3 hours ago, SkyDekker said: Iit isn't an article, it is an opinion piece. I can't help but think of all the useful tools who cannot tell the difference. Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for? Never mind, He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth. No collusion No obstruction Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions! And the loosers are poor loosers. AGAIN! What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term? Prediction More of the same and worse. Edited March 29, 2019 by rushmc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4559 March 29, 2019 Here is some more Democrats colluding https://www.foxnews.com/politics/msnbc-nbc-news-top-political-editor-accused-of-trying-to-intimidate-reporter-on-behalf-of-the-dnc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,123 #4560 March 30, 2019 Rush, it's the content (and the label on top saying "Opinion") that makes something an opinion piece, not the author. You'll note that article has "opinion" in the upper left hand column. The NY Times has a whole section devoted to (and labeled as) opinion. Wendy P. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,625 #4561 March 30, 2019 15 hours ago, rushmc said: Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for? Never mind, He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth. No collusion No obstruction Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions! And the loosers are poor loosers. AGAIN! What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term? Prediction More of the same and worse. You can't even read the 4 page Barr summary and figure out what it means, so how will you manage with the 400 page Mueller report? According to Barr the investigation did not establish that the campaign reached an agreement with the Russian government to take actions to impact the election in Trump’s favor, BUT it states that the campaign fielded “multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.” Yet Trump and others have repeatedly claimed that they had no contact with Russians, or knowledge that Russians were acting to assist his campaign. Trump and his lackeys are lying (again). Moreover, the Trump campaign did not bring the Russian outreach to the attention of law enforcement as it should have, but secretly allowed Russia's assistance. Remarkably, even after the release of the Barr letter — which makes it undeniable that the Russians were helping the Trump campaign — Trump still denies it. Also according to Barr, Trump has very definitely NOT been absolved of obstruction of justice. The absence of an indictment is meaningless when DoJ policy does not allow the indictment of a sitting president. Multiple senior members of the Trump campaign have been indicted and/or convicted as criminals. These are facts, not opinions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4562 March 30, 2019 5 hours ago, kallend said: You can't even read the 4 page Barr summary and figure out what it means, so how will you manage with the 400 page Mueller report? According to Barr the investigation did not establish that the campaign reached an agreement with the Russian government to take actions to impact the election in Trump’s favor, BUT it states that the campaign fielded “multiple offers from Russian-affiliated individuals to assist the Trump campaign.” Yet Trump and others have repeatedly claimed that they had no contact with Russians, or knowledge that Russians were acting to assist his campaign. Trump and his lackeys are lying (again). Moreover, the Trump campaign did not bring the Russian outreach to the attention of law enforcement as it should have, but secretly allowed Russia's assistance. Remarkably, even after the release of the Barr letter — which makes it undeniable that the Russians were helping the Trump campaign — Trump still denies it. Also according to Barr, Trump has very definitely NOT been absolved of obstruction of justice. The absence of an indictment is meaningless when DoJ policy does not allow the indictment of a sitting president. Multiple senior members of the Trump campaign have been indicted and/or convicted as criminals. These are facts, not opinions. Spin spin spin Spoiled loosers in concert Another example of useful tools spreading propaganda Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4563 March 30, 2019 8 hours ago, wmw999 said: Rush, it's the content (and the label on top saying "Opinion") that makes something an opinion piece, not the author. You'll note that article has "opinion" in the upper left hand column. The NY Times has a whole section devoted to (and labeled as) opinion. Wendy P. Wendy For two plus years many here repeated the opinions of those on CNN NBC ABC and others Now here is an opinion they do not like. And it had to be opinion and they had no facts to back up the bs they spewed Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,625 #4564 March 30, 2019 8 minutes ago, rushmc said: Spin spin spin Spoiled loosers in concert Another example of useful tools spreading propaganda Which of those FACTS are you disputing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,341 #4565 March 30, 2019 44 minutes ago, kallend said: Which of those FACTS are you disputing? The ones he doesn't like. Come on professor, like so many Trumpettes, he chooses to believe the narrative he wants to believe. Anything he wants to believe is true. Anything he doesn't want to believe is 'fake news." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nigel99 144 #4566 March 31, 2019 4 hours ago, kallend said: Which of those FACTS are you disputing? You’re flogging a dead horse. In the future when fox and friends turn on Trump that is when his story will change, until then it’s a lost cause Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 232 #4567 April 1, 2019 On 3/29/2019 at 6:21 PM, rushmc said: Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions! And the loosers are poor loosers. AGAIN! Yo. "Loser", not "looser". Sorry, that hurt my brain. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #4568 April 1, 2019 On 3/29/2019 at 5:21 PM, rushmc said: Did you happen to see who wrote it and what newspaper he worked for? Never mind, He was spot on target and you can’t handle the truth. No collusion No obstruction Loosers on MSNBC and fake news CNN are being dropped by viewers by the millions! And the loosers are poor loosers. AGAIN! What are all you guys going to do when Trump get win another term? Prediction More of the same and worse. Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years. After a while, people get tired of watching bullshit. (shrugs) Oh, and I get it, some thin-skinned sensitive people don't like my posts. You know what to do. The option is there. BillVon has mentioned it a couple of times. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #4569 April 1, 2019 17 minutes ago, BillyVance said: Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years. After a while, people get tired of watching bullshit. (shrugs) Oh, and I get it, some thin-skinned sensitive people don't like my posts. You know what to do. The option is there. BillVon has mentioned it a couple of times. The Mueller report has NOT been "delivered". Bullshit, indeed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BillyVance 34 #4570 April 1, 2019 5 minutes ago, normiss said: The Mueller report has NOT been "delivered". Bullshit, indeed. It's been delivered to Barr. It's all #RIDICULOUSBULLSHIT! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,341 #4571 April 1, 2019 14 minutes ago, BillyVance said: It's been delivered to Barr. It's all #RIDICULOUSBULLSHIT! Did you actually read what Barr wrote? Somehow I doubt it. I know Trump didn't. Or at least he didn't understand what it said. Quote Barr said that the special counsel states in his report that “‘while this report does not conclude the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him.” And somehow, I don't think Cohen, Flynn & Manafort think it was all a "hoax". Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,387 #4572 April 1, 2019 Let's compare the Mueller Report to the Starr Report: 1998-09-09: Starr Report delivered to Congress (not just to the AG). 1998-09-11: House voted 363–63 to release the report to the public. Quite a difference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 232 #4573 April 1, 2019 (edited) 35 minutes ago, BillyVance said: It's been delivered to Barr. It's all #RIDICULOUSBULLSHIT! Thought this was funny: https://twitter.com/MonicaLewinsky/status/1110768987539791872 Monica LewinskyVerified account @MonicaLewinsky FollowFollow @MonicaLewinsky More Monica Lewinsky Retweeted Orin Kerr if. fucking. only. Monica Lewinsky added, Orin KerrVerified account @OrinKerr Imagine if the Starr Report had been provided only to President Clinton's Attorney General, Janet Reno, who then read it privately and published a 4-page letter based on her private reading stating her conclusion that President Clinton committed no crimes. 10:02 PM - 26 Mar 2019 Edited April 1, 2019 by DJL Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #4574 April 1, 2019 1 hour ago, BillyVance said: Didn't Rachel Maddow lose like 500K viewers (apparently 23%) after the Mueller Report was delivered and No Collusion was announced? CNN and MSNBC shamelessly parroted the Russian Collusion hoax for 2+ years. 199 indictments. 39 people indicted, including 6 Trump insiders. 7 guilty pleas. 2 guilty convictions - one for colluding with Russians. Years and years of hard time in prison. More money in fines than the investigation cost to begin with. Trials in the queue. Quite a "hoax." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,625 #4575 April 2, 2019 10 hours ago, billvon said: 199 indictments. 39 people indicted, including 6 Trump insiders. 7 guilty pleas. 2 guilty convictions - one for colluding with Russians. Years and years of hard time in prison. More money in fines than the investigation cost to begin with. Trials in the queue. Quite a "hoax." Will you quit it with the FACTS - you'll make his head explode. He WANTS to believe that a serial adulterer, sexual predator, con-man who cheats his investors and contractors, proven liar (over 9,000 known lies), bully, draft-dodging narcissistic braggart is a great choice to be president of the USA and represent us to the world. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites