NightJumper

And as such I'm sure it will be a religious experience!

I would call them and ask for their sugestions. They may be able to sugest something that can remove it, and that would solve the issue. And like you said, you will probably get it dirty anyway. By the way, what is the going rate for a fadded spot on a leg strap?

Done

All PD military products are sold through CPS.

Actually, I have Chuck's here. Skydive Sebastian has used them and really liked how they worked. They do not use shock cord. Each drogue release has its own individual system. As a result they are not connected together where if one side fails so does the other. They are field replaceable in about one min. and existing drogue releases can be replaced with the new style.

It is 800' from where I work and 1.5 miles from where I live.

Nope, several companies make the parafoils. Just imagine the military advantages of a HAHO jump from 30K 11 miles from the shoreline (international air space) and still land inland undetected.

Well, since you brought up DeLand the answer would be yes since they have PJ's from Pattrick AFB jumping there with MC4,5 and MT1XX rigs.

Then get an order from the federal courts to compel the SSA to accept the documentation that you provided. I had to do this for my grandmother. The SSA didn't like it, but I didn't care. Hell, tell the court you are applying for relief FROM the Patriot Act.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/06/21/scotus.police.id/index.html This SUCKS! So what happens when they read you your rights and you choose to exercise those rights and remain silent. Then they just arrest you for exercising your rights.

I would think that you could petition the courts to help expedite the matter since you are the party involved. Or how about getting a certified copy of the court order granting your adoption? The bad news is that I believe you have to go through the federal courts to get an order to compel the SSA. Best of luck It's not, besides everyone knows that we train all of the terrorist down here in south Florida......that is, when we are not busy screwing up a presidential election!

Eiff Classic

We were. Wheels up at 6:00am for the 15,000' sunrise hop-n-pop. And yes we did have steak and eggs for breakfest afterwords.

You need to have a cup of coffee before you get on the plane, we exited at 15,000 and Mark was the pilot. John was on the load and exited in front of me so I hope he wasn't flying Stay safe, Mike

I understand your point and I even agree with some of what you have said. It is the law that I am stating and what is legal. And in no means does that mean I always or blindly agree with it.

And here I thought they were called televangelist.

That is true. They ruled on the merits of the case involving his lack of standing which allowed them to reject the case as a whole and avoid the issue of the pledge. This allowed the pledge to remain constitutional. Please understand that I wish that they would had been able to just give a ruling on the merits of the pledge issue. It is not like this is not going to come before them again. And while my personal opinion is that they were spineless, it was legal.

Because they were brought before a court of jurisdiction and ruled unconstitutional, that how. And yes a law did change if was ruled unconstitutional.

Awe, the old what if game. What if cows could fly....but since there are laws I guess we will never know.

I understand that the Supreme Court has not ruled the pledge unconstitutional and that kids can still say the pledge in school. Now what part of that don't you understand?

Exactly, which is what I said, they ruled on the case that was brought before them. Yes it did. And as a result of the courts ruling segregation was no longer allowed It wouldn’t be, as the court does not have the authority to change the constitution, as it is the basis for which the laws are applied. Not true, as a law is not unconstitutional until it is ruled as such. The fact remains that children can still recite the pledge in school as written until a court that has jurisdiction rules otherwise.

Wrong Again The case that was brought before the Supreme Court and has been ruled upon. Your statement that “the verdict is still out” is incorrect as there was a “verdict” in the case and it has been discharged. And yes, until it is ruled unconstitutional it is constitutional otherwise the schools would not be able to recite it which they can.

Wrong The Supreme Court has already ruled in prior cases that anyone has the right abstain but there is no requirement to inform them of this. And it is still constitutional until ruled otherwise.

Okay, I stopped having fun and went back to work....of course that ment I had to go test jump another canopy!

I agree, though that is not what I addressed.