normiss 622 #1801 September 11, 2016 Meanwhile, they're still ignoring Bush / Saudi money and connections It's how much money the Bush regime made from their war crimes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tonyhays 86 #1802 September 11, 2016 Happy 9/11. https://youtu.be/NsKaCS3CtsY“That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #1803 September 12, 2016 normiss Meanwhile, they're still ignoring Bush / Saudi money and connections It's how much money the Bush regime made from their war crimes. You do realize that bush hasn't been the president for about 7 years?I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #1804 September 12, 2016 I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #1805 September 12, 2016 normissI was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. What, exactly dos that have to do with Hillary? Oh - right- no defensible position, so, BUSH BUSH BUSH!!!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #1806 September 12, 2016 Given your logic skills, I understand your perspective. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #1807 September 12, 2016 normissGiven your logic skills, I understand your perspective. HA - Of course, Kettle!I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #1808 September 12, 2016 normiss I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. Love it! Hillary Supporter: She's innocent - innocent I tell ya. It's all about intent! The Obama admin didn't prosecute. There's no proof - she's not guilty. She's innocent - innocent I tell ya! - But damn that Bush and all his war crimes! Poster: It's all about intent. The Obama admin didn't prosecute Bush. Besides, he's not even running for president. He hasn't been president for 7 years, ya know? Hillary Supporter: I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #1809 September 12, 2016 normiss******I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. What, exactly dos that have to do with Hillary? Oh - right- no defensible position, so, BUSH BUSH BUSH!!! Given your logic skills, I understand your perspective. Nice touch! A little sprinkle of ad hom for a good measure of irony. You haven't a clue, do you?Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #1810 September 12, 2016 One of the most surprising things I've noticed about SC is how much I learn about myself. I have so many titles in here, it's just amazing! Most of them come from people with intense textual conversation challenges to boot. FYI, some clues I do actually have would include the understanding that the Obama administration doesn't prosecute anyone. I'm pretty sure we have an entirely separate arm of the government specifically for that purpose. I'm never going to understand the hatred for such a truly successful woman. I can understand dislike, but the obsessive hatred is sad to see, especially from the god people. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #1811 September 12, 2016 normissFYI, some clues I do actually have would include the understanding that the Obama administration doesn't prosecute anyone. "Eric Himpton Holder, Jr. served as the 82nd Attorney General of the United States, from 2009 to 2015. Holder, serving in the administration of President Barack Obama." "On November 8, 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Loretta Lynch to succeed Eric Holder as Attorney General." You should be more careful where you get your clues from.Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,254 #1813 September 12, 2016 Coreeece***I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. Love it! Hillary Supporter: She's innocent - innocent I tell ya. It's all about intent! The Obama admin didn't prosecute. There's no proof - she's not guilty. She's innocent - innocent I tell ya! - But damn that Bush and all his war crimes! Poster: It's all about intent. The Obama admin didn't prosecute Bush. Besides, he's not even running for president. He hasn't been president for 7 years, ya know? Hillary Supporter: I was unaware of a statute of limitations on war crimes. No US government will ever attempt to prosecute any US elected official under international law. A) No matter how egregious the behaviour sheer self preservation would stop them. No-one wants to open that can of worms, including Barack 'drone strike' Obama. B) the US voted against the Rome Statute and the International Criminal Court and never ratified their membership of it. Clinton, however, remains unindicted after ongoing hostile investigations by the FBI and various congressional bodies.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 186 #1814 September 13, 2016 jakee Clinton, however, remains unindicted after ongoing hostile investigations by the FBI and various congressional bodies. Commonplace. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,623 #1815 September 14, 2016 Colin Powell says Trump is a "national disgrace" and "international pariah". www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/colin-powell-calls-trump-national-disgrace-in-personal-email?utm_term=.sv2XJ5yPA#.ilDEvDdNY But we all knew that anyway.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #1816 September 14, 2016 Yeah, but we all know what Colin Powell is. Hint: he's not white. I also expect the Trumpsters to start excoriating Powell for his use of a private e-mail server and for lying to the UN about Iraq's WMDs. Loser. Sad. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
winsor 186 #1817 September 14, 2016 DanGYeah, but we all know what Colin Powell is. Hint: he's not white. I also expect the Trumpsters to start excoriating Powell for his use of a private e-mail server and for lying to the UN about Iraq's WMDs. Loser. Sad. He used AOL for personal email. He repeated the nonsense he was fed regarding WMDs. BTW, if having WMDs constitutes a casus belli for a preemptive attack, we're screwed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #1818 September 14, 2016 QuoteHe used AOL for personal email. If by "personal mail" you mean all unclassified government correspondence, then sure. QuoteHe repeated the nonsense he was fed regarding WMDs. True. But then why do conservative blame Clinton for believing the same nonsense. QuoteBTW, if having WMDs constitutes a casus belli for a preemptive attack, we're screwed. Having them in contravention of UN Resolutions is different than having them. But you knew that. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,384 #1819 September 14, 2016 Keith Olbermann sums it up nicely: http://video.gq.com/watch/176-reasons-donald-trump-shouldn-t-be-president"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,912 #1820 September 15, 2016 No questions, absolute madness.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #1821 September 15, 2016 Looks like we will need Trump to release all his medical records as well: ====================== Newsweek writer suggests Donald Trump was institutionalized for nervous breakdown in 1990 Daily News Bin September 13, 2016 Donald Trump was institutionalized in a mental hospital for a nervous breakdown in 1990, according to a tweet posted this evening – and then deleted – by Newsweek writer Kurt Eichenwald. He stated his belief that Trump is refusing to release anything about his medical records or history for fear that it could lead to this particular detail being uncovered from his past. ===================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #1822 September 15, 2016 DanGYeah, but we all know what Colin Powell is. Hint: he's not white. I also expect the Trumpsters to start excoriating Powell for his use of a private e-mail server and for lying to the UN about Iraq's WMDs. Loser. Sad. He did not have a private server. and Powell has never been a real republican"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #1823 September 15, 2016 billvon Looks like we will need Trump to release all his medical records as well: ====================== Newsweek writer suggests Donald Trump was institutionalized for nervous breakdown in 1990 Daily News Bin September 13, 2016 Donald Trump was institutionalized in a mental hospital for a nervous breakdown in 1990, according to a tweet posted this evening – and then deleted – by Newsweek writer Kurt Eichenwald. He stated his belief that Trump is refusing to release anything about his medical records or history for fear that it could lead to this particular detail being uncovered from his past. ===================== OH WOW!!!! REALLY???? FROM A TWEET??? CANT WAIT!!!!! You are slipping Bill....."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #1824 September 15, 2016 >OH WOW!!!! >REALLY???? >FROM A TWEET??? REALLY! LIKE MOST OF TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN! NOW YOU DON'T BELIEVE TWEETS? SAD! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #1825 September 15, 2016 billvon >OH WOW!!!! >REALLY???? >FROM A TWEET??? REALLY! LIKE MOST OF TRUMP'S CAMPAIGN! NOW YOU DON'T BELIEVE TWEETS? SAD! LOL I am just enjoying these threads Nothing of real difference from any other election year. Republican evil Republican supporters deplorable Democrat good I got it, I got it Carry on "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites