micro 0 #1 September 9, 2006 OMG, This is the fugliest thing I've ever seen... form follows function and all that I guess, but shit... this is just... eew. I guess Boeing finally felt the need to try and compete w/ Airbus' product? http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1106601&WxsIERv=Obrvat%20747-4W6%2FYPS&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Hagvgyrq%20%28Obrvat%29&QtODMg=Gnvcrv%20-%20Puvnat%20Xnv%20Furx%20Vagreangvbany%20%28GCR%20%2F%20EPGC%29&ERDLTkt=Gnvjna&ktODMp=Frcgrzore%209%2C%202006&BP=0&WNEb25u=F.Y.%20Gfnv&xsIERvdWdsY=A747OP&MgTUQtODMgKE=Tbbq%20Yhpx%21%21%20Whfg%20srj%20zvahgrf%20ntb%2C%20gur%20tvnag%20syvtug%20zbafgre%20bs%20Obrvat%20747%20snzvyl-%20Obrvat%20747YPS%20yrnir%20gur%20rnegu%20naq%20syl%20ba%20gur%20fxl%21%20Vg%A1%A6f%20uvf%20svefg%20bssvpvny%20syvtug%20nsgre%20unf%20orra%20guebhtu%20ercrngrqyl%20znal%20gvzrf%20gur%20cebwrpg%20qrynl.%20Guebhtu%20gur%203T%20uvtu-grpu%2C%20V%20pna%20funer%20gurfr%20cvpgherf%20gb%20lbh%20ba%20erny-gvzr.%20%5BAvxba%20Q2k%5D&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=3163&NEb25uZWxs=2006-09-09%2006%3A38%3A08&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=25879%2F904&static=yes&width=1000&height=679&sok=JURER%20%20%28qngrfgnzc%20%3E%20qngr_fho%28ABJ%28%29%2C%20VAGREINY%2024%20UBHE%29%29%20%20BEQRE%20OL%20ivrjf%20qrfp&photo_nr=2&prev_id=1106351&next_id=1106419&size=L I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
StreetScooby 5 #2 September 9, 2006 AHCK! I wonder if it's mother cried when it was born? Thing is way ugly.We are all engines of karma Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #3 September 9, 2006 QuoteAHCK! I wonder if it's mother cried when it was born? Thing is way ugly. I dunno, but I'm cryin! And the Belugas are laughin! http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1044972&WxsIERv=Nveohf%20N300O4-608FG%20Fhcre%20Genafcbegre&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Hagvgyrq%20%28Nveohf%20Vaqhfgevr%29&QtODMg=Gbhybhfr%20-%20Oyntanp%20%28GYF%20%2F%20YSOB%29&ERDLTkt=Senapr&ktODMp=Qrprzore%207%2C%202005&BP=0&WNEb25u=%D3fpne%20Ynobeqn%20F%E1apurm%20-%20Vorevna%20Fcbggref&xsIERvdWdsY=S-TFGP&MgTUQtODMgKE=Oryhtn%20%233%20gnxvat%20bss%20sebz%20EJL%2032Y%2C%20va%20n%20grzcbenel%20nyy-juvgr%20cnvag%20fpurzr%20orsber%20nccylvat%20gur%20arj%20Nveohf%20yvirel.%20OGJ%2C%20jung%20n%20avpr%20yvtug%21%20%5BQ70%20%2B%20Avxxbe%2080-200%20RQ%20%28A%29%5D&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=4906&NEb25uZWxs=2006-05-14%2000%3A30%3A30&ODJ9dvCE=3&O89Dcjdg=765&static=yes&width=1152&height=780&sok=JURER%20%20%28ZNGPU%20%28nvepensg%2Cnveyvar%2Ccynpr%2Ccubgb_qngr%2Cpbhagel%2Cerznex%2Ccubgbtencure%2Crznvy%2Clrne%2Cert%2Cnvepensg_trarevp%2Cpa%2Cpbqr%29%20NTNVAFG%20%28%27%2B%22oryhtn%22%27%20VA%20OBBYRNA%20ZBQR%29%29%20%20beqre%20ol%20cubgb_vq%20QRFP&photo_nr=4&prev_id=1053455&next_id=1040405&size=L I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
usedtajump 1 #4 September 9, 2006 Looks similar to the "Super Guppie", a Boeing modification done to the old C-97 used to haul missles for NASA in the 60s, 70s and 80s.The older I get the less I care who I piss off. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #5 September 9, 2006 How about some beluga?Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ntrprnr 0 #6 September 9, 2006 QuoteQuoteAHCK! I wonder if it's mother cried when it was born? Thing is way ugly. I dunno, but I'm cryin! And the Belugas are laughin! http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1044972&WxsIERv=Nveohf%20N300O4-608FG%20Fhcre%20Genafcbegre&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Hagvgyrq%20%28Nveohf%20Vaqhfgevr%29&QtODMg=Gbhybhfr%20-%20Oyntanp%20%28GYF%20%2F%20YSOB%29&ERDLTkt=Senapr&ktODMp=Qrprzore%207%2C%202005&BP=0&WNEb25u=%D3fpne%20Ynobeqn%20F%E1apurm%20-%20Vorevna%20Fcbggref&xsIERvdWdsY=S-TFGP&MgTUQtODMgKE=Oryhtn%20%233%20gnxvat%20bss%20sebz%20EJL%2032Y%2C%20va%20n%20grzcbenel%20nyy-juvgr%20cnvag%20fpurzr%20orsber%20nccylvat%20gur%20arj%20Nveohf%20yvirel.%20OGJ%2C%20jung%20n%20avpr%20yvtug%21%20%5BQ70%20%2B%20Avxxbe%2080-200%20RQ%20%28A%29%5D&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=4906&NEb25uZWxs=2006-05-14%2000%3A30%3A30&ODJ9dvCE=3&O89Dcjdg=765&static=yes&width=1152&height=780&sok=JURER%20%20%28ZNGPU%20%28nvepensg%2Cnveyvar%2Ccynpr%2Ccubgb_qngr%2Cpbhagel%2Cerznex%2Ccubgbtencure%2Crznvy%2Clrne%2Cert%2Cnvepensg_trarevp%2Cpa%2Cpbqr%29%20NTNVAFG%20%28%27%2B%22oryhtn%22%27%20VA%20OBBYRNA%20ZBQR%29%29%20%20beqre%20ol%20cubgb_vq%20QRFP&photo_nr=4&prev_id=1053455&next_id=1040405&size=L Awesome- That's the "Dolphin-Plane" everyone's been laughing about. How funny!_______________ "Why'd you track away at 7,000 feet?" "Even in freefall, I have commitment issues." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Samurai136 0 #7 September 9, 2006 I dunno, there's something kinda sexy about it too. Like the ugly duckling that's so hideous, it's cute. ok here's my man card. can I pick it up at the end of the day?"Buttons aren't toys." - Trillian Ken Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkydiveStMarys 0 #8 September 9, 2006 It looks like the snake that swallowed the pregnant ewe. BobbiA miracle is not defined by an event. A miracle is defined by gratitude. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #9 September 9, 2006 QuoteI dunno, there's something kinda sexy about it too. Like the ugly duckling that's so hideous, it's cute. ok here's my man card. can I pick it up at the end of the day? Quick! Someone give it emergency gastric bypass surgery before it kills itself! I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Squeak 17 #10 September 9, 2006 looks like it would be fucking dark in there Yes people I knowYou are not now, nor will you ever be, good enough to not die in this sport (Sparky) My Life ROCKS! How's yours doing? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,406 #11 September 9, 2006 >This is the fugliest thing I've ever seen... Boeing is using this 747 to transport pieces of the 7E7 'dreamliner' during manufacture. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 14 #12 September 9, 2006 I talked to a Boeing pilot the other day who says it's in the flight test phase. The back end will be unpressurized but heated. Sounds like a perfect jump plane. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #13 September 9, 2006 QuoteHow about some beluga? ____________________________________ SHAMU!!! Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #14 September 9, 2006 QuoteI talked to a Boeing pilot the other day who says it's in the flight test phase. The back end will be unpressurized but heated. Sounds like a perfect jump plane. Hey just think of the opportunities inside that thing for..... weightless flight... now THAT would be badass.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #15 September 9, 2006 QuoteQuoteI talked to a Boeing pilot the other day who says it's in the flight test phase. The back end will be unpressurized but heated. Sounds like a perfect jump plane. Hey just think of the opportunities inside that thing for..... weightless flight... now THAT would be badass.. And with the fuel load that thing can handle just think of the time you can spend riding the "Parobolic Porpoise"! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
warpedskydiver 0 #16 September 9, 2006 they should actually paint it to look like a dolphin, it would actually be beautiful in it's own way then. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elisha 1 #17 September 9, 2006 I think that closeup looks kinda like an armadillo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 14 #18 September 10, 2006 QuoteI think that closeup looks kinda like an armadillo. Ooooo, armadillo paint job. That would be bad ass. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jtval 0 #19 September 10, 2006 QuoteOMG, This is the fugliest thing I've ever seen... form follows function and all that I guess, but shit... this is just... eew. I guess Boeing finally felt the need to try and compete w/ Airbus' product? http://www.airliners.net/open.file?id=1106601&WxsIERv=Obrvat%20747-4W6%2FYPS&Wm=0&WdsYXMg=Hagvgyrq%20%28Obrvat%29&QtODMg=Gnvcrv%20-%20Puvnat%20Xnv%20Furx%20Vagreangvbany%20%28GCR%20%2F%20EPGC%29&ERDLTkt=Gnvjna&ktODMp=Frcgrzore%209%2C%202006&BP=0&WNEb25u=F.Y.%20Gfnv&xsIERvdWdsY=A747OP&MgTUQtODMgKE=Tbbq%20Yhpx%21%21%20Whfg%20srj%20zvahgrf%20ntb%2C%20gur%20tvnag%20syvtug%20zbafgre%20bs%20Obrvat%20747%20snzvyl-%20Obrvat%20747YPS%20yrnir%20gur%20rnegu%20naq%20syl%20ba%20gur%20fxl%21%20Vg%A1%A6f%20uvf%20svefg%20bssvpvny%20syvtug%20nsgre%20unf%20orra%20guebhtu%20ercrngrqyl%20znal%20gvzrf%20gur%20cebwrpg%20qrynl.%20Guebhtu%20gur%203T%20uvtu-grpu%2C%20V%20pna%20funer%20gurfr%20cvpgherf%20gb%20lbh%20ba%20erny-gvzr.%20%5BAvxba%20Q2k%5D&YXMgTUQtODMgKERD=3163&NEb25uZWxs=2006-09-09%2006%3A38%3A08&ODJ9dvCE=&O89Dcjdg=25879%2F904&static=yes&width=1000&height=679&sok=JURER%20%20%28qngrfgnzc%20%3E%20qngr_fho%28ABJ%28%29%2C%20VAGREINY%2024%20UBHE%29%29%20%20BEQRE%20OL%20ivrjf%20qrfp&photo_nr=2&prev_id=1106351&next_id=1106419&size=L Looks like they taped it together with brown pacakging tapeMy photos My Videos Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #20 September 10, 2006 Quote>This is the fugliest thing I've ever seen... Boeing is using this 747 to transport pieces of the 7E7 'dreamliner' during manufacture. The 7E7 has gone into production, the first one has anyway, and it's now designated the 787. It would make sense to have a custom transport for flying in the really big parts. Don't know if they still do, but they used to hire a Russian Antonov jet to fly in engines for the 777 (those engines are as big around as the body of a 737). Airbus also has a huge customized monster plane for ferrying A380 parts around Europe. But this is not a passenger plane. Boeing's basically given up on super jumbos. They won't design anything big enough to replace or surpass the size of the 747 and have only offered warmed over extended models that nobody was interested in. Instead, Boeing is concentrating on long range planes that can carry a medium load of passengers, like 260 or so, from almost anywhere to almost anywhere else in the world non-stop. That's what the 787 is all about and it's picked up a lot of orders. But it's still sad to see Boeing give away the lead to another company. But that's what's happened to Boeing, all the visionaries are long gone and have been replaced by bean counters who want to build Toyotas with wings. Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
micro 0 #21 September 11, 2006 QuoteQuote>This is the fugliest thing I've ever seen... Boeing is using this 747 to transport pieces of the 7E7 'dreamliner' during manufacture. The 7E7 has gone into production, the first one has anyway, and it's now designated the 787. It would make sense to have a custom transport for flying in the really big parts. Don't know if they still do, but they used to hire a Russian Antonov jet to fly in engines for the 777 (those engines are as big around as the body of a 737). Airbus also has a huge customized monster plane for ferrying A380 parts around Europe. But this is not a passenger plane. Boeing's basically given up on super jumbos. They won't design anything big enough to replace or surpass the size of the 747 and have only offered warmed over extended models that nobody was interested in. Instead, Boeing is concentrating on long range planes that can carry a medium load of passengers, like 260 or so, from almost anywhere to almost anywhere else in the world non-stop. That's what the 787 is all about and it's picked up a lot of orders. But it's still sad to see Boeing give away the lead to another company. But that's what's happened to Boeing, all the visionaries are long gone and have been replaced by bean counters who want to build Toyotas with wings. I don't know that your critique of Boeings business strategy is correct. While Airbus has taken the Bigger-Is-Better route, they've also ran into a fair bit of trouble recently w/ the A-380 as well. They've had some cancelled orders and there are going to be a helluva lot of airport infrastructre changes in order to get that beast serviceable, at least in the US. I think Boeings move is far more practicle, esp. if the 787 can be produced faster in larger numbers, which will (hopefully) decentralize a little more from the bigger hubs, which the larger Airbus cannot do. In todays economy, I think the 787 is going to be more successful, at least in the long run. The spotlight right now is on the A380, IMO, just b/c it's so BIG and Airbus got it flying so quickly. I think it's faddish though and the world economy is still too volatile to support such a craft esp. w/ terrorisms threats still looming. I miss Lee. And JP. And Chris. And... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
sundevil777 93 #22 September 11, 2006 QuoteDon't know if they still do, but they used to hire a Russian Antonov jet to fly in engines for the 777 (those engines are as big around as the body of a 737). That was only done for the first couple 777s, because P&W was behind schedule, so having them build up the nacelle before shipping helped, but it was too big for 747 freighters.People are sick and tired of being told that ordinary and decent people are fed up in this country with being sick and tired. I’m certainly not, and I’m sick and tired of being told that I am Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #23 September 11, 2006 QuoteBut this is not a passenger plane. Boeing's basically given up on super jumbos. They won't design anything big enough to replace or surpass the size of the 747 and have only offered warmed over extended models that nobody was interested in. Instead, Boeing is concentrating on long range planes that can carry a medium load of passengers, like 260 or so, from almost anywhere to almost anywhere else in the world non-stop. That's what the 787 is all about and it's picked up a lot of orders. But it's still sad to see Boeing give away the lead to another company. But that's what's happened to Boeing, all the visionaries are long gone and have been replaced by bean counters who want to build Toyotas with wings. Airbus has had some major order cancellations on the A380. Their supply and production lines are running into major "snafus" that have forced them to delay completed orders by years. Boeing's concentration on greater efficiency, without the need for major overhauls in infrastructure is spot on. There's nothing wrong with a Toyota (especially when compared to a Peugot or Renault). The Airline industry cannot afford the A380. From fuel cost to terminal expansions to materiel needed to maintain the beast, the industry doesn't have the money to spend to buy it, or operate it.So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bob.dino 0 #24 September 11, 2006 You sure about that? The A380 won't be for every route, but LHR-[BKK,SIN]-[SYD,MLB], LHR-JFK, and LAX-NRT would all suit it nicely. I'd be very surprised if the 787 was a flop, but then they're aimed at two very different markets. The A350 is the aircraft I'd be more concerned about. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites