davjohns

Eh. I've always been circumcised. Never saw that it was a big deal one way or the other. My son is circumcised. He never mentioned happiness or discontent with it. People pierce ears on babies. Nobody seems up in arms about that. 670k people dying of malaria each year. 2,000 murdered in Nigeria last week by Boko Haram. ISIL slaughtering people because they pray wrong. I'm not going to put too much energy into whether someone else decides to get their baby circumcised. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Fellatio and cunnilingus have been performed at the same time in numerous occasions, I don't know if they have been done on a skydive. There must be a reason free-flyers developed both head-down and head-up flying. They are too busy messing with their cameras to think about airborn 69 What exactly does any of this have to do with answering my question? Heheheh....new guy. Thinks his question should be the point of the thread. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Yup. I had forgotten that point. Almost like the IROC series that gave it's name to a properly equipped Camaro in the 70's and other cars later. I think the Trans Am was the IROC car in the late 90's and early 2000's. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Exactly. It's like having a Jeep Wrangler, Rubicon edition. The Camaro Z28 actually referred to a package code in the VIN in the early years. You could look at the VIN and find the Z28 as part of it. I once had a used car salesman try to convince me a 68 Camaro he had was a Z28. It had a ten bolt rear end differential. The Z28 had a twelve bolt. I pointed out to him the problem with the VIN. He stopped talking to me. Camaro had about a dozen different packages including Berlinetta, RS, SS, RS/SS, etc. The only variants of the Firebird that I recall were the Firebird Formula and the Firebird Trans Am. Of course, there were convertibles and body variations like spoilers, hood scoops, T tops, and such. The most famous Firebird Trans Am was probably the one from Smokey and the Bandit. Like you note, the manufacturer was Pontiac. The Camaro was the Chevrolet counterpart. They were meant to rival the Mustang that pre-existed both of them. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

You have to be half crazy to get upset because someone wishes you happiness. It doesn't matter if it is associated with a holiday you don't celebrate. I'm not Muslim. I celebrated Muslim holidays in Iraq. It's a CELEBRATION for crying out loud. I'm happy to paint myself green and dance naked around a bonfire at midnight on Winter Solstice if it's going to be a good time. It doesn't matter if you worship Cthulhu or not. Wait....that's exactly what I did on Winter Solstice... I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Merry Christmas! Happy Hanukkah! Chipper Festivus! Best of wishes for everyone. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Bowtech RPM360. 360fps with a 350g arrow at 70lbs and 30in draw. I have to build a new target. The arrows are trying to pass through my commercial target block. Too much kinetic energy. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Actually...no. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Finally! It wasn't raining today, so I pulled away from work early so I still had some daylight left. (It's 5pm here and already dark) I got to French tune my new bow. The next to last shot frayed the string. The final shot centered the string and buried in the target with a 'pop!'. Time to go upstairs and shoot the pistol now. I'm getting better, but I seriously miss summer activities. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Well, you certainly made my holidays more merry. Now, what to do with this sudden 'North Pole' condition. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

No. 20 - davjohns I'm seriously questioning the integrity of your so-called database... I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I am still not in that list! The new pair is very nice, though. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

The idea of celibacy gives me the creeps. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Yup...here it is...back by popular demand

Hmmmm... First time I recall hearing someone suggest the guy tries to trap the girl, but I guess so. My experience was a bit different.... :p Got snipped well over 20 years ago. Haven't thought about it since. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I'm pretty sure I used it once. I figured there must be a reason it was there. Didn't work for me. Then, about twenty years ago, I decided I didn't see the point of underwear. No longer an issue. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Where the hell were you hanging out??? I just saw this topic. Not sure what to think about it. Maybe one day, I'll get tired of all the myriad opportunities for sexual positions and give it a try. It hasn't happened so far, though. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I've taken that oath and the officer's version (which leaves out the portion about obeying the President). I have administered that oath dozens of times. There is no expiration. It is in the nature of most oaths that they are for a lifetime. They define who you are more than they define what you will do. If you took the oath, you are a veteran. Yesterday marked 30 years of service for me. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Skydive Maubeuge closes for the season after November. If you want me to jump with you, you're going to have to decide quick! I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Sorry to hear that, Nat. Happy Birthday....? I have to second the 'coward' vote. I've always thought the most difficult conversations are those that absolutely must be had face to face. It's a matter of respect in my book. You'll always have us. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I think most people would agree that a loving home with two parents is preferable to a single parent. Raising children often requires two people working at the task. If nothing else, having someone who has strengths to compliment your weaknesses makes you a better parent. The problem is that government has nothing to do with the more advantageous situation that you describe. Government still allows divorces for most any reason...or do you propose the government no longer allow divorce and require parents to stay together for the sake of the children? I'm jesting. I know that is not your argument, but it is the logical outcome thereof. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

In my mind, it pre-existed the issue of gay marriage. Polygamists have deplored the government telling them who they could and could not be married to for decades before the gay marriage issue came the fore. Before that, it was difficult for people to get a divorce because government rules followed religious guidelines. So, people were unable to marry who they wanted because they were still married to who the government tied them to. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Marriage today is a government regulation of personal relationships. You need government permission to be 'married'. You need government permission to cease being 'married'. I understand that much of the fuss is over benefits offered people who are 'married'. But that is just an offshoot of the underlying issue. If you did away with the government determination of who is and is not 'married', the special status offered those who comply with the government's definition of 'married' should naturally fall away. Along with my criticism of government sanctioned 'marriage', I have issues with special tax provisions, special healthcare provisions, etc. If two people want to spend their lives together, why should there be special provisions for or against them? At the heart of the matter is a personal relationship between two consenting adults. Everyone else should stay out of it...especially government. I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

I have yet to hear a reasonable explanation for why the government (at any level) regulates personal relationships between consenting adults...at all. The people who can't pass a budget on time or even balance a budget want to tell us how to run our personal lives. Does anyone else see a problem with that? David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.

Over 5,000 people have died of ebola this year. In 2012, the WHO estimates over 627,000 people died of malaria. Context would suggest there was something to this hysteria other than the number of deaths. Just an observation. David I know it just wouldnt be right to kill all the stupid people that we meet.. But do you think it would be appropriate to just remove all of the warning labels and let nature take its course.