JerryBaumchen

Hi Michael, Try here: Amy Murrell - Tennessee Attachment Co. 800-251-5000 www.tennattachment.com [email protected] They have built my last three binding attachments; all 90 degree versions. Jerry Baumchen

Hi skycop, IMO opinion, no excuse is necessary. However, you were on this thread and not paying any attention to the thread you started. That did not make sense to me. Jerry Baumchen PS) And I'm glad that you think these dipsticks were being unprofessional. We're making progress, I hope. And I am a very strong support of LEO agencies; I just do not support them having a union that keeps dipsticks like this on the job.

Hi Coreeece, I am as important as you are, no more no less, 'dude.' Jerry Baumchen

Hi skycop, When are you going respond to my question here: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?do=post_view_flat;post=4783650;page=4;sb=post_latest_reply;so=ASC;mh=25; See post #86. When you start a thread, you really should take ownership of it and stay with it until it dies. You have little credibility with me. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Terry, If we use the thinking of the FAA on the service life of a certificated product, then for the mfr to actually 'require' it, would they have had to include it at the time of original certification. That does not mean that they cannot strongly recommend it. Guess what position the FAA would take if PIA were to write to them about this 'requirement?' Your thoughts?????? Jerry Baumchen

Hi skycop, This type of horse-puckey is what gets my undies in a wad: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2016/05/11/video-shows-officers-punching-driver-after-police-chase-through-massachsuetts-and-new-hampshire/ I understand that these situations can cause a fair amount of emotional distress. However, their job it to treat people as they would want their mothers to be treated. Mothers, daughters, whatever; they all fit. There is simply no room, in my mind, for people like this to be in any position of authority. Your thoughts???????? Jerry Baumchen

Hi Keith, Sorry, that is subjective. And, just where is this 'problem' at? Again, completely subjective. And as regards polling, let us not forget what polling told us back in '48: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dewey_Defeats_Truman Everything that I see as regards your comment about screening is completely subjective. I have no problem with subjectivity, but let's not call it factual. I have no problem with prosecuting anyone who breaks the laws of this country. I do have a problem when 'those people' are subjected to things that they simply have not done. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Wendy, As I will. Hillary is nowhere close to being my first choice. She is just the best choice at this time. My first vote for a president was in 1964, LBJ vs Goldwater. Jerry Baumchen

Hi rush, Typical rush-speak. It is no wonder you have near zero credibility here. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Keith, This comes down to what is 'properly screened.' It is completely subjective. I am not aware of any Muslims coming into this country that have not followed proper screening. Yes, I am aware that there are a few here and there. Trump's comments are purely IMO to stir up hatred; and it is working very good for him. There is far more hatred of our fellow man in this country than any of us actually suspected. Trump is just bringing it out into the open. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Mark, ^^^^ This! It works very well for Limbaugh, Hannity, etc, why stop now? It is going to be interesting to see how many people we know that will vote for Trump. The true colors are beginning to show. Jerry Baumchen

Hi folks, This one is for you, irishrigger: IRISH WEDDING: At the Irish wedding reception the D.J. yelled... "Would all married men please stand next to the one person who has made your life worth living." The bartender was overwhelmed by the attention. Jerry Baumchen

Hi folks, More truth here than most of us would want to admit: Dear Tech Support, Last year I upgraded from Boyfriend 5.0 to Husband 1.0 and noticed a distinct slowdown in overall system performance, particularly in the flower and jewelry applications, which operated flawlessly under Boyfriend 5.0. In addition, Husband 1.0 uninstalled many other valuable programs, such as: Romance 9.5 and Personal Attention 6.5, and then installed undesirable programs such as: NBA 5.0, NFL 3.0 and Golf Clubs 4.1. Conversation 8.0 no longer runs, and House cleaning 2.6 simply crashes the system. Please note that I have tried running Nagging 5.3 to fix these problems, but to no avail. What can I do? Signed, Desperate Dear Desperate, First keep in mind, Boyfriend 5.0 is an Entertainment Package, while Husband 1.0 is an operating system. Please enter command: I thought you loved me.html and try to download Tears 6.2 and do not forget to install the Guilt 3.0 update. If that application works as designed, Husband 1.0 should then automatically run the applications Jewelry 2.0 and Flowers 3.5. However, remember, overuse of the above application can cause Husband 1.0 to default to Grumpy Silence 2.5, Happy Hour 7.0 or Beer 6.1. Whatever you do, DO NOT, under any circumstances, install Mother-In-Law 1.0 (it runs a virus in the background that will eventually seize control of all your system resources.) In addition, please, do not attempt to re-install the Boyfriend 5.0 program. These are unsupported applications that will crash Husband 1.0. In summary, Husband 1.0 is a great program, but it does have limited memory and cannot learn new applications quickly. You might consider buying additional software to improve memory and performance. We recommend Cooking 3.0 and Hot Lingerie 7.7. Good Luck! Tech Support Jerry Baumchen

Hi joe, Looks like the NoDaks are getting into it also: http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/woman-tossed-garth-brooks-concert-north-dakota-after-using-men-n571611 Jerry Baumchen

Hi Paul, And you are absolutely correct. It is simply too bad that some people cannot seem to understand the distinction. Re: infinitesimal probability of winning =/= win by a landslide Jerry Baumchen PS) =/= means does not equal.

Hi folks, A skydiver was driving through a large sheep ranch one day, and saw a huge flock off in the distance. As he got closer, he saw the shepherd standing near the road, so he decided to impress him with his use of technology. The driver pulled off the road and approached the shepherd. "Morning," he said. "If I can accurately count your herd of sheep, will you give me one?" The shepherd shrugged and said "Sure, why not?" The driver reached into his car and retrieved a laptop and satellite phone. After tethering the laptop to the phone he downloaded a real-time full-color image of the area. He digitized the photo, then used a mathematical algorithm of his own design. After a few seconds the laptop chimed and he turned to the shepherd. "This flock contains 14,643 sheep over 1,217 hectares." With a smug look, he closed the laptop and reached for a nearby animal. "Very impressive," admitted the shepherd. "I think I know who you are. If I can identify you, will you give me back my property?" The driver replied "I'll take that bet, because we have never met. There is no way you can know me." "Your username is Dipstick," replied the shepherd, "and you post on www.dropzone.com in the Speaker's Corner forum quite often." "That's not possible," stammered the driver. "It's quite simple," said the shepherd. "You told me what I already know and gave me more information than I asked for. It is a common syndrome on that and many forums." The shepherd stopped for a moment, the smug look now on his face. "And," he continued, "give me back my dog." Jerry Baumchen

Hi rehmwa, It really depends upon the laws & the judge. A guy in high school ( back in the 50's ) did a year at MacLaren for stealing just one french fry. He had been on some form of juvenile probation and had been warned to not get into any more trouble. While walking along the beach at the Oregon coast, he reached out and took one french fry from a small kid. The kid's dad grabbed him & held him until the authorities came. He ended up back before a judge, who gave him the year inside. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MacLaren_Youth_Correctional_Facility Jerry Baumchen

Hi Ken, But they will be The Second Fool. You can figure out who is The #1 Fool. Or should I say, ' . . who are the #1 fools?' Jerry Baumchen

Hi turtle, Yes, they do. However, the interstate highway system was for moving the military; both troops and materials. After Ike saw the autobahns in Germany in 1945, he wanted the same for us. And he got it. Jerry Baumchen

Hi turtle, You got change. You just do like what you got. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Mark, Yup, and they could do it permanently. Back in the mid'70's, during the gas crisis, Montana had no speed limits on the highways. The feds demanded that all states institute a 55 MPH speed limit. Montana said that they would not. They told Montana to do it by a date or else. At 5:00 PM on the date of the 'or else,' Montana instituted the 55 MPH speed limit. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Stumpy, Surely, you jest. Jerry Baumchen

Hi Scooby, Based upon my readings, the estimates were 1 million US military ( along with other invasion partners ) would be killed & it would take 1 1/2 yrs to complete if we had invaded Japan. Jerry Baumchen PS) My dad was in the Navy in the Pacific in WW II.

Hi winsor, Nope, they showed that they could do it before that: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_(nuclear_test) They did it to end the war. You should have been around back then, attitudes were much different. Jerry Baumchen

Hi accumack, Thanks. Now, who did offer them first? I did not own a square until 1978 ( StratoFlyer ) & it had them. Jerry Baumchen