BartsDaddy

I don't know why your posting that to me. I am not arguing to deprive anybody of any rights. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Very true. Although it could be argued that voting is more of a "duty" than a "right" And, yes, non-legal residents don't have the same gun rights as do citizens and permanent alien residents (green card holders). There are likely a few others. But the rights of "due process", 1st A rights to freedom of speech and religion, the somewhat nebulous right to "privacy", all the rights that would be rather blatantly violated by this proposal to "register" any Muslims (pretending to fight "terrorism") are applicable to anyone on US soil. Well you could argue it is a duty, but the amendment to let women vote clearly states it as a right. I am in agreement with your last paragraph, But if they can limit the second amendment, what is stoping them from limiting others. And no I am not saying they should be able to limit rights just saying they all ready are. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Legal immigrant isn't considered an American Citizen anymore? Many legal immigrants are not citizens. Same as in Canada. Immigration is a path to citizenship, it does not grant citizenship. Very true. Many immigrants have become citizens, but there are also many who are either not citizens yet or have no intention of becoming one. But, as I noted above, EVERYONE has rights. Citizen or immigrant, resident or tourist, even illegals - ALL OF THEM get the same rights guaranteed by the Constitution, BOR and subsequent amendments (and other stuff like Supreme Court rulings). I would dissagree with you all of them do not get the same rights. Many legal and all illegal immigrants can not legally buy or posses a firearm. And then there is voting. I probably could find more if I really tried. But I would agree with you on the thought that they should be for anyone on US soil.

I think that is true of any politician. Would you pick this 'direction:' Muslim Women Wearing Hijabs Assaulted Just Hours After Trump Win http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/muslim-women-wearing-hijabs-assaulted-just-hours-after-trump-win-n681936 IMO Trump's actions in the campaign is what is bringing this type of crap out into the forefront. Jerry Baumchen Ok, so of the three incidents mentioned one was a false report, one was a run of the mill street mugging, and the third was unknown. Most likely just some jackass trying to pull the scarf off her head. Hardly wat I would call a new wave of Islamophobia. But it's all Trumps fault. If he had lost none of those would have happened. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Care to tell us what you and Skymamma where looking for when you googled that? Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

My score would be -20 .we're fucked in this election. There is no good canadate to vote for. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

It's also posible they wanted him free, so in a litle while he will disappear. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Long live nippleboy

Keep moving Thoose goal posts. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

I can see the point you are trying to put across. Now I am not trying to justify why I should be able to say nigger because I don't say that word verry often and when I do it is in a conversation like this. But the word bitch and nigger are not treated any where near the same. I as a white male can stand in a group of people and complaint about some bitch ripping me off or how some hitch at work makes my life misserable because of her demands. And get replies of they understand and there is All ways a few that will make you life misserable. Now if I change that word from bitch to nigger I get a huge different response. I just might get my ads kicked, or worse. I am not defending use of either but they are on different planes of offensivness. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

No your example is based off of friendship or stranger not race. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

yes they did the first machine gun was patented in 1718 the Puckle gun Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Where did I say it was federal law it is state and therefore the PC on it changes from state to state. But the GCA of 1968 makes interstate transfer without going through a ffl illegal Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Actually they do require verification of the purchasers home state. So if you think making a background check manadtory will stop that you are dreaming. There are laws in place here in California all puchases have to go through a ffl. You would not believe the number of people I have delt with that think it is ok to sell to anybody. Just have them bring the money and here's your gun. And we have had this law for about 20 years. Just cause you pass a law does not mean it is enforcable or will be followed. What we need is the ones we have now be enforced. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Did not know him. But Blue skies Black death and RIP. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

No I prefer health over money. No one can guranty how bad you will be hurt in a crash. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

You forgot the mantra: "Guns DON'T kill people....." Naah. I don't play silly, sematic, "one-up" games on here. Besides, guns don't kill people. Bullets do. It's actually the chemical reaction that happens inside the bullet. Let's ban chemical reactions! In ordinary bullets there is no chemical reaction. In a tracer, api, apit, spotter, raufaus yes ordinary bullet no. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

That isn't the first time a twin otter has been used for that task. I know of 4 or 5 other times I have heard it happening. What they may have done special to make it happen I don't know. But maybe some oil and fuel heaters or a low temp oil at least. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Yep I've met you on the road or at least ones like you. You think you were legal in that move. But impeading the flow of traffic is a citable offense. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Where you a ball monitor in school too? It amazes me at the number of people that I encounter on a daily basis that will pace themselves with the car next to them just to keep the cars behind them behind them. When it would not effect them one bit to either speed up and pull over then resume same speed, or slow down pull over and resume same speed. I travel 50 miles one way for work in southern California and it never fails I will get behind a wall of 3 cars side by side matching speeds between 65 to 70 mph keeping every body behind them for 10 to 20 miles at least 2 Or 3 times a week. 65 to 70 on southern California freeways is below average. Theese people cause the unsafe conditions of making people have to try to get around them rather then just get in the same lane and tool along at thier desired below average speed. But I guess that is not passive agressive enough for them. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Since when is a bible a school text book? Only in bible school that is not mandatory for people to attend. Would you be ok with the bible being mandatory reading in public schools? Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

I get zero results when I google " turtle speed is a Russian spy". now leave the quotes off and yes your results are accurate, But then google is looking for any use of those words not the entire statement. Which I am sure you were already aware of. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

And many many more less then mass shootings have been stoped by good guys with a gun. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Another uninformed poster. It has happened more then once. The news Dosent report it as agresive as the shootings for whatever reasons. And most people that are concealed carring are also informed about the lawsuits to follow. Yes in a shooting like we had in Orlando the other night, I would hope they would do something instead of worrying about lawsuits. But it is a gun free zone seeing as how they Ser've alchahol. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle

Nope. The laws are working just fine in this case. They are stopping fraud by a criminal, which is what they are designed to do. You seem unsure of the takeaway from this story. Let me put it in terms you might better understand. Let's say Joe Smith opens up a diner. He's anti-gun. He has "NO GUNS ALLOWED" signs all over the store, and exhorts his patrons to vote for gun control measures. His bathrooms feature "toddler killed by gun" newspaper clippings. He has menu items like "gun nut omelet" which sometimes contain bits of lead. You're not supposed to eat them; it's a joke. The menu even says "eat this only if you think bullets are safe!" Then it is discovered that he has a small arsenal at his home, carries a handgun at his diner, and in fact is in violation of CCW laws. Would your response be that we need harsher gun laws? Or would you think he was a hypocrite? My response would be to not patronize that establishment,and to inform the FDA that he is adding lead to the food let them do thie r job. As far as the rest it is his buiseness he can be Antigun in his buiseness that is his choice. It may bring in more money for him, it could cost him money. Are you saying people should only conduct thie r business on thie r true believes. We have had some bakers do that and get sued. So your rebuttal does not hold true to the orignap story, but nice spin. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle