toolbox

yep!

Jesus was most likely Caucasian. Not saying there is no way he was black,but very unlikely since most of the people from that area at that time were Caucasian. The people from that part of the world had Caucasian facial bone structures,and some even had blonde hair or light brown hair and some even had blue eyes as well. Most middle eastern people are not black but are Caucasian. Santa was a turk and was also most likely Caucasian.

The first incident with the 10 hispanics involved two nevada state troopers and a DOT worker. Repeat,two Nevada state troopers and a Nevada state DOT worker. Minorities were oppressed in the past,but that is no longer the case in the US. I do believe that branding libertarians as mostly racist white men is racist in itself. I know there are more than a few women and minorities who are libertarians. Probably not many illegal immigrant libertarians though.

I was witness to a fender bender involving a ford explorer with 10 illegal Hispanics inside,and a new scion with 2 white guys inside. The cops came and realized that all the people in the explorer were undocumented illegal immigrants. The cops then call the DOT to come and fix the blown tire on the explorer and get them back on the road. Eric,the driver of the scion asked the cop for the explorer drivers license and insurance imformation so he could get the scions destroyed bumper and right fender fixed. That cop told Eric while I was standing next to him that the driver and all the passengers of the explorer were illegals and that he was shit out of luck. Meanwhile the explorer drove away with a new tire and rim at the tax payers expense with all 10 illegal immigrants on board. 2 years later in Colorado,I watched a visiting white male skydiver who over stayed his visa by 2 days because he got stranded in the snow get handcuffed and taken away for being in the country illegally. He was held in jail for 2 more days before being deported.

50 years ago minorities may have been oppressed but not now. The illegal immigrants from Hispanic countries for instance get far better treatment than white illegal immigrants.

Early police reports were released to the press stating that the shooter was an ex TSA employee. The initial reports are now known to be false,but the reports were not hard to believe after recent events like the ex cop going batshit crazy in LA and targeting other cops.

So much for freedom of expression.

Some people might want or need an AR-15 for whatever reason and that is their business. I do not want nor do I feel the need for an AR-15. I do however want an M1A as I might need one if social collapse were to occur from natural disasters, or for any number of other reason. The M1A is chambered for the .308 Winchester round which is very effective at ranges of 600+ yards in expert hands and,I'm sure I could make hits with this weapon at 400 yards myself. The .308 is very well suited for hunting any big game in north America and,is more than capable for defense against large predators. I want a full length M1A with six 20 round magazines and,it is within my rights as a law abiding US citizen to have one.

Pretty much how I feel about things.

The point is that blaming any inanimate object for hurting,or killing someone, is retarded. The person operating the car,the gun,the high performance canopy,the jumbo jet,the pressure cooker,are solely responsible for any harm to themselves or to others. People will always find ways to hurt or kill themselves, or others.

On average 40,000 people are killed in automotive accidents each year in the US. Cars are also very effective at killing cats,dogs,deer,couger,skunks,ponies, and probably dancing liberal rainbow unicorns as well. 2 tons moving at just 40 MPH has a lot of killing potential and there are a lot of cases of joy riding car thieves killing pedestrians for fun.

We need common sense control.For the children........

Exactly

I'm not a religious person but I feel that there could be a higher power that we humans are incapable of understanding. I try to be objective and as understanding as a human can be. It seems to me that religion is a tool. Just like other tools,such as hammers,guns,explosives. Tools can be used for good deeds,or bad deeds. A hammer can be used to build or to destroy. Religion can be used to teach compassion and give hope,or used to teach hate and intolerance. Jews used religion as banners for war and oppression,christians used religion in this way as well. Muslims also have done this. The use of religion as a banner for violence is not just left to jews,christians,and muslims,but rather to almost every religion. For example,the natives of north,central,and south America often used religion as reason for violence and conquest. At present islam is the greatest threat to everyone who doesn't drink the muslim koolaid.

So far no one has been able to prove the existence of god. This doesn't disprove gods existence. Religion on the other hand exist with or without god. Religion is an invention of humans. So why blame god for what humans do because of religion? Religions have been used to incite war and the subjection of others for as long as religions have existed. At this point in time islam seems to be the most militant and intolerant religion at work.

>When was the last time you got stopped and frisked for no good reason? Friday before super bowl 2009 I was stopped because my windows were down. He asked if I had been drinking or using drugs. I said no. He then did a field sobriety test and searched me and then let me go. It was 68 degrees and sunny that day. I am white with blonde hair and blue eyes.

I'm confused once again. Is Zimmerman a racist white hispanic who dated a african american girl and tutored african american children? Or,is Zimmerman a racist hispanic white who dated a african American girl and tutored african American children? He probably had some evil racist motive for making a formal complaint to the local police pertaining to their unfair treatment of a african american homeless man as well.

Interesting. I wonder what kind of opening they might have if the canopy were deployed with that side saddle position going on? Canopies have a history of deployment before it is time for deployment for a number of reasons.

Hey Rusty! You are 100% correct. We were always on the same page of music when it came to procedures and and the boy scout motto "prepare for the worst and hope for the best". I spoke with Tye a while back and it was good to hear you were back out at freemont county and working with newbies again. Cheers!

Exactly! You don't need altitude awareness in the tunnel. You don't need to check the spot in the tunnel. You don't need a harness container with two parachutes in the tunnel. You don't need a set of emergency procedures to practice in the tunnel. You don't need canopy skills in the tunnel. And the list go's on,and on. The tunnel is friggin awesome,but it's not skydiving,but rather it's a free fall simulator. I knew the guy at snohomish and liked him a lot. He was a good guy,but very over confident like many guys his age. I'm sure many will miss him. The free fall portion of skydiving is dangerous,but it is the canopy decent that takes the cake when it comes to serious injury or death. I've always believed that the most dangerous part of modern skydiving is the last few hundred feet to the ground under a good canopy. The current statistics strongly support my beliefs.

Isn't jihad an islamic word describing the struggle in the way of allah? If I'm not mistaken the struggle can be within and peaceful,or an outer struggle with violence against non believers. It would seem that the fort hood shooter was having an outer struggle in the way of allah as he shot up his fellow soldiers who would most likely be considered non believers in his eyes. Not saying a jew or hindu could never be a terrorist,but it seems to be far less likely. This guy was expressing violent jihad at fort hood and that is considered an act of terrorism here in the USA where it is unlawful for the government or an individual to punish people with violence for their religious beliefs. If a white supremacist army officer shot up a bunch of jewish or muslim soldiers I bet the present administration would be Johnny on the spot to call it an act of terror, as it should be.

Killing 150 and wounding the same with an ambulance bomb would most likely be considered a terrorist act. Fort Hood should be considered a jihadist attack by a Islamic extremist.

>Federal gun control is on the back burner. For them it's never really dead. However at the state and local level it is most assuredly not dead. Bingo! The gun ban proponents are vigilant in pursuit of their goals at all levels of government. They have been pressing hard against the second amendment of the US constitution for over sixty years.