JoeWeber

I guess we can add paranoia to your list of cognitive infirmities. Were you military, I would next have asked if mindsets like yours were prevalent in your unit. Now I know it's much simpler: you are just an angry old man, unhappy with your lot in life, who finds validation in lashing out bitterly at make believe enemies. The internet and this forum give you a channel to behave as abysmally homophobic and prejudicial as you like without fear of retribution. I'll further guess that in your little circle at home you take pains to be well behaved lest you be left without even the pretense of friends. Old age is a time for mellowing out and enjoying the days you have left not hating ever more intensely. Go find some good in something.

Mark, Are you in the military stationed in Germany? Joe

And still you avoid his main point. You won't be taken seriously, Bill, until you post a GIF of you doing some Lesbian dancing.

Sadly, the enlightenment came and went and left us behind. We ain't got sense, can't cipher and are short on grasping the germ theory of disease, that's a fact. But we got's po-boy's, Glocks and the fecund abridgment!

Easing back in through the playground?

I don't believe that for one iota.

Because it's blasphemy to defame Christ's chosen ones. Oh, but if the Muslims get all twitchy when the Prophet is defamed that's intolerable!

For Ron, there are no better sources. It's no longer a mystery how Goebbels was able to pull it off, that's for sure. Nothings changed in the last 75 years. People are as racist, xenophobic, credulous, wicked, self serving and vindictive as ever. It's very hard to believe our species will survive ourselves.

If the DZO doesn't want it, and if it's not in the nature of the local customer base, it wont happen.

Well, I'll be dipped in doo doo and rolled in bread crumbs! We need testing?

When Ron goes out for dinner: "Good evening sir, do you have a reservation with us tonight?" "No. Not safe. System not secure." "Yes sir, of course, not a problem. How many are in your party?" "Unknown. Waiting. Being watched. Soon." "Certainly, sir. We'll prepare your table. Can I have your name, please?" "No. Gave it away last night. Stolen. Wait. Chavez." "Very good, Mr. Chavez, let me just take your temperature, sir." "Drop it! I will shoot. Lima. Air America. Communists". "Please, sir! Don't shoot. It's just a thermometer". "Leaving. Don't follow. Benghazi. Deep state."

Well, of course it is. I'm working a deal here and you and Ken are doing your best to fuck it up.

I'll take Q for $2000 Phil. Churlish as I am I would never expect someone to renounce their religion.

Nope, I'm so new I squeak. I'm also so old I no longer have an inside voice. That, and given that no one with an ounce of sense would ever hire me, there is no chance I'll ever be fired. Sort of, I think if you want to be anonymous join AA. Here, if you are going to be loud, be brave and say who you are.

You are going to be so jealous when, at long last, Ron announces here on SC that I was right and he was wrong. So there!

You're right, in the big scheme of things we are a bunch of no ones. I'm simply one no one who has no respect for no ones who argue anonymously online. Others here don't agree, so it goes.

Westerly, As brazen and combative as you are when you post here, in the spirit of full disclosure and basic human honesty, and out of fairness would you please be so kind as to fill out your profile? Or, if you really have a pair, tell us your name.

Well, you can only nudge so far with an officer of the court, Jerry. To date, "not seriously unethical" is the best I've been able to do.

So one thing going on is the "guess your weight technique" used at the boardwalk and the "whose mother has a problem" scam used by charlatans with stage audiences. Words like shall, who, more?, why, and how are just tools to learn what to ask next. Thinking about why this post was made at all makes me guess that the ostensible Q (if you believe it's real, of course) cannot be in government at all. There is not even the pretense of a scintilla of inside knowledge. The writer is simply polling the Q-Hive to know how to stay relevant. So, Ron, if your belief in Q was predicated on his/her being "inside" the government you now have evidence that you've been duped.

They always give themselves away, no? So, what was in those cases you were bringing back, Ken?

Two comments. First, I've hired a lot of lawyers with a variety of practice specialties over the years and paid out a boatload of money for the privilege. Some were better than others, mostly on a raw brain power basis, but not a one was crooked or seriously unethical. Second, closing the "Who will win the 2020 Election" poll was not only uncalled for it was being flat out rude to Trump True Believers, all conspiracy theorists, and others who just tend to run a little late. Not nice.

Maybe we should check around to see if there are any somebodies who are going back and forth between Manitoba and the plague stricken upper mid-west. More breadcrumbs.