turtlespeed

Why does anyone really care about this guy?

All of them? Most of them? A few of them? or just that one?

Because they don't have the criminal element we have here.

Well, when you can explain the taxation that is not represented . . . If anything it is overly represented.

Because there are labor laws, unions, and a litigious society.

Is there proof of this? Or did it just get said?

His advisors admission. Here is some info - https://www.politifact.com/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-if-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it/ His "You can keep your plan" mantra was just as true as Trumps comments about the covid being gone - Sounded good at the time, but anyone with a brain knew what was probably going to happen. The left doubled and tripled and quadrupled down on that though didn't they?

They need more subsidies to make them better!!!!

They could be profitable, but the cant be Affordable, and profitable.

THAT explains a LOT!!! There isn't a guy on any far right holding a sign. Not from your point of view.

Its not a zero sum game. Its a what can we afford now game. If that's the case we would need to roll back the dollar amounts and adjust for inflation. Plus - we would then need to take innovation, technology, and invention into account, if you wanted it to be fair. All of those three were a substantial. and VITAL part of the ability to create the batteries we have now. So - I say lets call it even and just drop the subsidies. While that scholarship fund kid has been given all the answers to the test before he even had to study for it.

We do agree on some things . . . ALL - each and every one of its drill sites. But that also means that Green energy needs to foot its own bill for clean up and remediation in ALL of its material gathering and Mining sites. Side Note: I bet you didn't know I was an avid believer in the clean water act and think it stopped short, did you?

Eventually isn't even in this century though. I agree - but what is the fix right NOW? I still say to let the chips fall where they may. Use those subsidies toward Social Security Debt.

Why would he? This is what Hilary had to say: LOL How soon we forget, eh? Hypocrisy is exactly what the left has now. And then THIS little nugget. Evidently, yes, and it was Hillary.

Just so I'm clear - Subsidies for oil is Good on Brent's side, but horrific to behold on the Green side. All the while - The green side is OK with Solar and Wind subsidies, even though they are much less efficient. The subsidies are keeping the prices artificially low so the public doesn't get hit in the pocketbook quite so hard. That's easy - remove all subsidies and let the market figure it out. BUT - that would kill green energy, because people are greedy. Is that about right?

What are the predictable results?

Maybe you can help with the inaccuracies in the video.

Its not about the size of the gap - It's ALL about the age at which the participants start the romantic relationship. Now that I typed that - I wanted to place in there a caveat that I suppose in some circumstances, where a platonic relationship was fostered before the romantic one, that MIGHT not apply . . . but then I didn't want to think about that anymore. It was a creepy thought.

3/5ths or so has passed. 2/5ths remain . . . And the rate we are going - we will meet and exceed all of the NOAA predictions, with the exception of maybe the strength of Cat 3 or above. But Brent will take that micro point and disqualify the entire prediction and say - "See NOAA cant predict anything - so Climate change caused by (non natural introduction of chemicals and elements and compounds into the air)AKA Man Made Climate Change is a hoax!" Am I right?

I believe they would have lined their pockets just like every other politician would have. Probably not to the extent, nor as blatantly as Trump, but, the coffers would be much fuller. (more full?)

The DNC had Hillary scheduled for the Presidency. Anything other than that, the DNC wouldn't have considered.

Did he say that he knows more about ad agencies, their hiring practices, and low to mid level management practices? I'm sure the university that you worked for hired several employees that have made grand mistakes before. I know you are above such reproach, as you are perfect. I'd imaging that someone was to be held accountable for a misdeed there somewhere though, eh? Or, is this just a bunch of back slapping, Trump Hating, good ol' boys humor? The reason I ask is that you seem to be taking it very seriously. That isn't to say that you have any real reasoning behind it, but serious nonetheless.

Ok - so - Back to the video. Which specific parts are untrue and/or incorrect?

There is controversy over brush clearing, forest management, Global Warming, Climate change, and people have started fires in order to prove their point in the past. It is also extremely difficult to prove arson in that situation. It seems reasonable to me that someone with an agenda has made some of this happen intentionally.

Oral isn't sex. Bill said so!