turtlespeed

It's also extremely hard to prove - even if it is true.

Does it not also reduce statutory rape for non-straight people to a misdemeanor? Equaling the previous for straight SR?

Zero? This from the BBC (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-51125898) According to Australia's National Centre for Research in Bushfire and Arson, 13% of bushfires every year are deliberate and 37% are suspicious. In the US state of California, 95% of wildfires are started by people - 7% of those by arson - according to Cal Fire, the state's fire service. It sounds like they cannot make up their mind on the stats. I would never have believed 75% I was thinking more like 5%. 13% was surprising.

We align 100% on this.

So prove me wrong. Answer the questions. It should be pretty easy to come up with the number of separations this guy had from Trump. How many does it take? What - a minimum of 10?

He asked a pretty relevant question that you keep ignoring. What specifics in the video do you disagree with? Which do you have to admit are true?

That is just because they are testing them more.

I don't think it was. He was told he would not be nominated. They told Bernie that but he didn't listen.

How, specifically? What specific approval did he make? What hiring decision did that spawn from? Show exactly where, please. That is your Bias showing. That is likely what you would have tried to do. Not everyone thinks like you.

https://filmdaily.co/news/california-fire-arson-attacks/

Historically, there are political statements involved in the fires.

Nice - Glad they can be politicized and bought.

That isn't exactly what my friend the California attorney is saying. I'll post his response when I get time. As I understand it - It does Both. It lessens the penalty for all offenders and adds language for LGBT protection (Maybe should be called equality) since they were likely being over-penalized in relation to "straight" offenders, under the old wording. But the jist of the reasoning behind it is two fold - Fairness, and, that there are too many cases to prosecute, so they are needing to lessen the burden on the courts.

I challenge you to see if Biden could even tell the difference, with out the media prompting him. I'd be willing to bet he couldn't tell the difference between an AK and an M-14. I'm sure that when you saw that ad, without the media telling you what to think, your very first thought was, Holy Fuck - "That's a MIG!!!" . . . . Right? Be honest. OR - you could admit that you didn't even think about, or see the add before you were told what to think, and until someone gave you fuel to hate Trump even more.

Its sad. You are looking so hard to find fuel to hate Trump. Its funny from where I sit. But also sad Nonetheless.

Aggie!

So - I had a friend that worked for American Airlines as a project manager (Actually Sabre). He was overseeing a web page and stuck a place holder of a guy riding a Harley with a sheep, in and forgot. He admitted he was being lazy and just grabbed a pic. They made a big stink about it and he almost lost his position. Should the CEO of Sabre be held accountable for the hello kitty? In closer comparison, should the director of the TSA be held accountable? Do you really think that Trump had any say in the hiring of this individual? Be realistic.

No - I don't. That isn't to say he wouldn't. Someone in a hurry grabbed a pic and splashed on the background. Its a nothing-burger unless you need fuel for your hate. Then by all means - use it for mental masturbation hating Trump.

I think you misspelled "Biden supporters".

Usually, they are. Not in this particular case, though.

What in the world makes you think he sat at his desk and designed that ad himself? What makes you think he had any involvement in its design?

How many of those were arson?

Not really, but this is definitely asking for violence. What a racist. Its sad, really.

Burn

Whaddya know - you were right!!