0
AMax

AAD's on big-ways

Recommended Posts

I have a question to experienced big-way folks. I have heard more than once that some people like to turn the AAD off when they have to leave in first wave and open close to minimal deployment altitude to minimize the possibility of two out due to AAD fire. So is this absolutely uncommon, suicidal, old school or people still do that?

The patient silence of those who cannot consider themselves as experienced big-way folks would be greatly appreciated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hmmm, I've never heard that, but NO ONE should be dumping that low on any skydive where the cypres would arm and fire.

IMO, doesn't sound like the best thing to do, nor have I heard anyone recommend that on any of the bigways I was on.


Judy
Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've been on a few (not a lot, but a few). I do know that it wasn't discussed as an option at Kate and Tony's bigway camp last month, and it wasn't discussed as an option at Rob Laidlaw's camp last year.

Opening at a safe altitude was emphasized. Some bigway jumpers prefer faster-opening canopies because of the possibility.

If it's common in the "in crowd" well, it's now clear I'm not in the "in crowd."
There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I remember one person using that as an excuse for a cypres fire on a record attempt. I thought it was BS then and I still do. I also know another person who had a cypres fire/ 2 out and blamed her snivelly canopy and not her low deployment altitude. Also BS.

I know when they did the Venezualan national record a few years ago, AADs were mandatory.

And I was there for one fatality during a record attempt that might have turned out differently IF she had used one of her cypres equipped rigs.

Its not an uncommon attitude among old school jumpers, but it isn't the norm either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've never had this suggested, and I'm a "first wave" breakoff on almost every big-way I've been on.

If you deploy low enough to risk a CYPRES fire, you just broke the BSR concerning container opening altitude. No organizer ever asked me to deploy below 2 grand.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
>So is this absolutely uncommon, suicidal, old school or people still do that?

It is uncommon nowadays. 15-20 years ago it was common for people to not use older AAD's for big ways (any RW, really) since they tended to fire prematurely. But that's not true any more. Most of the people on the 300 and 372 ways used cypreses, and I recall only a few cypres firings (including one that fired due to landing near a radar installation in the landing area.) I don't recall anyone talking about turning off their cypres 'in case they went low.'

Personally I have only made that decision once, about ten years ago, and it turned out to be both a good and a bad decision. Good because I would have had a cypres firing on that jump, bad because it's really stupid to make a jump where you think you might go low. A better decision would have been to not make the jump.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The patient silence of those who cannot consider themselves as experienced big-way folks would be greatly appreciated.


Well, hope you do not mind me forwarding a fact:

There was a cypres save a few weeks ago here in Germany where a jumper fell into a 16way with enormous speed and knocked out an other jumper who did not regain consciousness before landing. He broke an arm but lives.
For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote



I've never had this suggested, and I'm a "first wave" breakoff on almost every big-way I've been on.

If you deploy low enough to risk a CYPRES fire, you just broke the BSR concerning container opening altitude. No organizer ever asked me to deploy below 2 grand.



Just to clarify. I did not mean to ask if organizes suggest not to use an AAD or open lower than 2K ;) Clearly, opening close to minimum deployment altitude increases the risk of AAD fire so I was curious how many people are willing to make a trade between a possibility of getting knocked out and not having a functional AAD and getting a two out. Thanks for your input ;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just to clarify. I did not mean to ask if organizes suggest not to use an AAD or open lower than 2K Clearly, opening close to minimum deployment altitude increases the risk of AAD fire so I was curious how many people are willing to make a trade between a possibility of getting knocked out and not having a functional AAD and getting a two out.



No, if I am that concerned about traffic on opening I don't need to be on that skydive.

If you are going for a World Record all particpants on the jump need to be under the canopy they intend on landing by 1500 ft, so a cypres fire would nulify the jump if it was completed.

judy
Be kinder than necessary because everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Pulling low (purposely) or doing something that is considered unsafe on a bigway, will get you cut or sat down, no matter how good of a skydiver you are. ;)

Skydivers that are jumping with an AAD know it's a choice, bigway or not, most people that have them realize the purpose of them and have them ON for every skydive I'd hope.

On the bigways I have been on (alot), I have never heard anyone saying they were turning it off so they could pull low, as they realize the risk of a collision and the possible NEED for the AAD before the track off on a bigway. ;)


Be safe.
Ed
www.WestCoastWingsuits.com
www.PrecisionSkydiving.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
old school - I've been on MANY of the big ways, always in the base, always near-last to open, wore a Cypres since 1991, NEVER had a fire and I never worried about it either.

turn your Cypres on, big ways mean more chances for a collision. Learn to track fool! that will keep you alive longer. leave the formation when you are supposed to and stop making excuses for opening low.

(TK's survival skills for fat base guys)

TK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've done lots of bigways, and most times I'm on the outside wave being one of the lower ones to open. Cypress is not turned off. I just keep an eye on traffic and my altitude so I won't dump low. If there is someone that I see that is going to cause a problem during the track, I don't wait till the last second to fix the problem. Most times we are tracking for a good six seconds. Be aware and find the clear air space before it's too late.
May your trails be crooked, winding, lonesome, dangerous, leading to the most amazing view. May your mountains rise into and above the clouds. - Edward Abbey

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
An AAD on big ways would be advisable - depending upon who is organising, you could be knocked out due to someone tracking into your head (happened to me twice on one jump which was an 8 way???, but I didn't pass out).

Generally, break off is very regimented on big ways. You have a break off height and a pull height, eg, first wave go at 5k and pull no higher than 2.5k. If those people pull at 2.5k then they are open before their hard deck.

To follow on from other peoples' topics - if you do your job on a big way then there should be no reason to pull low or not get into your own airspace to pull.

To slightly go off topic, I have chosen my canopy with regard to big ways due to it's characteristics - a Spectre - on heading openings and with my wingloading and type of canopy, I stay up in the air longer than most letting the more high performance canopies/pilots land before me.

By the way, there is no such thing as a stupid question, only a stupid answer:)
If my answer has been stupid, please disregard:P

Liz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I'm not sure how many of those were turned on.


If they wern't turned on, then why not? Cypres may not be all that important for CRW, but it won't cause any harm.



We use radios in the large CRW formations and some people have concerns about radio frequencies causing unexpected behavior with AADs. This is one reason, there are a few other reasons people have... it's always about possibility of misfire seeming greater than possibility of the AAD saving someone in a CRW formation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I have a question to experienced big-way folks.



I was in a big-way a couple years ago. 70 jumpers in the formation. There were 3 or 4 AADs... I'm not sure how many of those were turned on.

;)



LOL ... Somehow I knew that sooner or later Crew dogs will post something like that ;););)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

BTW, I don't jump an AAD on bigways.



Do you jump with an AAD when not on bigways?



Only on tandems currently.

My original statment was typed too fast...it should read "For the most part people who say they suck it below that for saftey reasons are delusional."

Sorry for the confusion.
----------------------------------------------
You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

BTW, I don't jump an AAD on bigways.



Do you jump with an AAD when not on bigways?



Only on tandems currently.

My original statment was typed too fast...it should read "For the most part people who say they suck it below that for saftey reasons are delusional."

Sorry for the confusion.





I'm curious to know why you don't use an AAD when not doing tandems,

I was very opposed to the mandatory use of AAd's here in Spain
firstly, because we did'nt get to vote on it
Secondly, I really do belive it should be a personal choice for experienced skydivers

Gone fishing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0