Phil1111 1,108 #4226 January 16, 2019 rushmcQuoteHillary Clinton’s use of private email server among ‘gravest’ offenses to transparency, judge says ***On Thursday, Lamberth ordered the State and Justice departments to work with Judicial Watch on a discovery plan to determine whether Clinton used the server to circumvent FOIA requirements, the Hill reported. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-server-among-gravest-offenses-to-transparency-judge-says https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq8f8oU9wYs Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #4227 January 16, 2019 Phil1111https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cq8f8oU9wYs Nailed it, even from over two years ago. Putin did indeed get exactly what he wanted - a puppet that would sow division within the US, cripple its government and bend over backwards for Russia. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,589 #4228 January 16, 2019 billvon So Trump has done everything he can to hide his contacts with Putin. No wonder the FBI has been investigating him to see if he's a Russian stooge. A snippet of one transcript has leaked out: Putin: "The woods are lovely, dark, and deep, but I have promises to keep. And miles to go before I sleep, and miles to go before I sleep. Remember. Miles to go before I sleep." See? Perfectly innocent!"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #4229 January 16, 2019 Hahaha, look who is back to being a huge fan of the FBI and government oversite..."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,108 #4230 January 16, 2019 Christie says Trump is surrounded by 'revolving door' of 'grifters, weaklings, convicted and unconvicted felons' https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/425578-christie-says-trump-is-surrounded-by-revolving-door-of-grifters " the president is surrounded by "amateurs," "weakinglings" and "unconvicted felons." Axios reported that Christie wrote in his book "Let Me Finish" that Trump has a "revolving door of deeply flawed individuals — amateurs, grifters, weaklings, convicted and unconvicted felons — who were hustled into jobs they were never suited for, sometimes seemingly without so much as a background check via Google or Wikipedia." Claim "TRUMP IN 2016: "I only hire the best people!" Fact Check- see the story above. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,341 #4231 January 16, 2019 rushmcQuoteHillary Clinton’s use of private email server among ‘gravest’ offenses to transparency, judge says ***On Thursday, Lamberth ordered the State and Justice departments to work with Judicial Watch on a discovery plan to determine whether Clinton used the server to circumvent FOIA requirements, the Hill reported. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-server-among-gravest-offenses-to-transparency-judge-says Wouldn't that mean that Ivanka Trump's use of a private email for government business be among the 'gravest' offenses to transparency? I mean if Hillary broke the law, she should be punished for that. But, then so should Ivanka. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #4232 January 16, 2019 Quote Wouldn't that mean that Ivanka Trump's use of a private email for government business be among the 'gravest' offenses to transparency? I mean if Hillary broke the law, she should be punished for that. But, then so should Ivanka. How about Trump destroying the translator's notes in his conversations with Putin? Aren't there a lot of chapped asses over Hillary having disposed of the her old phones and electronics. Anyway, her emails are there for any investigative body to see and none of them have found anything damning. Sure, some were not recoverable but the thing is she wasn't able to selectively block investigators from recovering any specific email. Mostly lost emails were recovered on the other end from recipients along with standard recovery efforts of the digital material. Investigators were then left with a cross section of her previously deleted emails which again showed nothing damning. The people still chanting the "Lock Her Up" BS need to come to grips with the fact that there's nothing to send her to jail for."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,485 #4233 January 16, 2019 And I gotta love how they are STILL blaming her for the military response to the attacks on the embassy in Benghazi. Since when does the Secretary of STATE have responsibility for military affairs? When things went bad in Somalia (Black Hawk Down), there was significant criticism of how the military reacted, how the Pakistani "rescue" force had just sat in their compound while Americans were under attack, all of that. The heat came down on Les Aspin, Secretary of DEFENSE. You know, the guy in charge of the military. I'll agree that mistakes were made before the Benghazi attacks, but I can't see how HRC was responsible."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #4234 January 16, 2019 wolfriverjoeAnd I gotta love how they are STILL blaming her for the military response to the attacks on the embassy in Benghazi. Since when does the Secretary of STATE have responsibility for military affairs? When things went bad in Somalia (Black Hawk Down), there was significant criticism of how the military reacted, how the Pakistani "rescue" force had just sat in their compound while Americans were under attack, all of that. The heat came down on Les Aspin, Secretary of DEFENSE. You know, the guy in charge of the military. I'll agree that mistakes were made before the Benghazi attacks, but I can't see how HRC was responsible. Most of the current criticism is that the State Department disallowed the military response, I believe the primary one is that the security contractors had laser targeting hardware available to them and that an F16 launched from Northern Italy would've been able to arrive and delivered coordinated air strikes. That's some GI Joe/Hollywood bullshit if I ever heard it. Ambassador Stevens wanted to bring diplomacy out from behind the exact barricades and armed guards that detractors say would've protected him. As for these statements about whether The Video was the reason for anything... Who cares? It's what the CIA also thought at the time and considering that they were the ones on the ground there I don't fault Obama or Hillary or Rice or anyone for repeating it."I encourage all awesome dangerous behavior." - Jeffro Fincher Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,108 #4235 January 16, 2019 DJLQuote Wouldn't that mean that Ivanka Trump's use of a private email for government business be among the 'gravest' offenses to transparency? I mean if Hillary broke the law, she should be punished for that. But, then so should Ivanka. How about Trump destroying the translator's notes in his conversations with Putin? Aren't there a lot of chapped asses over Hillary having disposed of the her old phones and electronics. Anyway, her emails are there for any investigative body to see and none of them have found anything damning. Sure, some were not recoverable but the thing is she wasn't able to selectively block investigators from recovering any specific email. Mostly lost emails were recovered on the other end from recipients along with standard recovery efforts of the digital material. Investigators were then left with a cross section of her previously deleted emails which again showed nothing damning. The people still chanting the "Lock Her Up" BS need to come to grips with the fact that there's nothing to send her to jail for. Its "Judicial Watch (JW) is an American conservative activist group[1] and self-styled watchdog group[2][3] that files Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits to investigate claimed misconduct by government officials. ... Activities and controversies Judicial Watch’s main targets have been Democrats, particularly Bill and Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.[14] " https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_Watch Which has initiated ZERO actions against the trump crime family. None against any trump official. I will quote from the first sentence of this Judge's opinion: "On his first day in office. President Obama set a worthy standard for his administration's compliance with the Freedom Of Information Act" Marc and this conservative hatchet group are fishing in a dry mud hole. trump could have ordered and investigation of HRC on day one as promised. They refused to do so. Both Marc and trump have refused to answer why. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #4236 January 16, 2019 SkyDekker***QuoteHillary Clinton’s use of private email server among ‘gravest’ offenses to transparency, judge says ***On Thursday, Lamberth ordered the State and Justice departments to work with Judicial Watch on a discovery plan to determine whether Clinton used the server to circumvent FOIA requirements, the Hill reported. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-server-among-gravest-offenses-to-transparency-judge-says Wouldn't that mean that Ivanka Trump's use of a private email for government business be among the 'gravest' offenses to transparency? I mean if Hillary broke the law, she should be punished for that. But, then so should Ivanka. more than that we're talkin about the espionage act. Because she had top secret emails on her server both received and sent."America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #4237 January 16, 2019 DJLHahaha, look who is back to being a huge fan of the FBI and government oversite... You completely missed the point of my post"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #4238 January 16, 2019 DJLQuote Wouldn't that mean that Ivanka Trump's use of a private email for government business be among the 'gravest' offenses to transparency? I mean if Hillary broke the law, she should be punished for that. But, then so should Ivanka. How about Trump destroying the translator's notes in his conversations with Putin? Aren't there a lot of chapped asses over Hillary having disposed of the her old phones and electronics. Anyway, her emails are there for any investigative body to see and none of them have found anything damning. Sure, some were not recoverable but the thing is she wasn't able to selectively block investigators from recovering any specific email. Mostly lost emails were recovered on the other end from recipients along with standard recovery efforts of the digital material. Investigators were then left with a cross section of her previously deleted emails which again showed nothing damning. The people still chanting the "Lock Her Up" BS need to come to grips with the fact that there's nothing to send her to jail for. Yet again we have a post that says or States that Trump has done something that's illegal and should be taken care of. The point of my post regarding this is you didn't care when Hillary or Obama did it! Not that they did it first like the spin Master Bill likes to post"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #4239 January 16, 2019 Now that we know Trump destroyed any notes about his meetings with Putin, let's reexamine the timeline: Jul 6 2017 - Trump arrives at G20 summit Jul 7 - Trump has first meeting with Putin, with others present. Afterwards he destroys any records of the meeting. Jul 7 - NYT contacts Trump family to ask them for comments on the story they are about to break - that Trump Jr met with a Russian agent in Trump tower. Jul 7 - at G20 dinner, Trump sends frantic hand signals to Putin requesting they meet Late Jul 7 - Trump has secret meeting with Putin - only him, Putin and translator. He does not inform any US staff. Again all records are destroyed. Jul 8 - Trump calls NYT, says Russia was falsely accused of meddling in election Jul 8 - Trump makes false statement about Trump Jr's role in the meeting Jul 8 - NYT publishes story about meeting with Russian agent Jul 11 - NYT publishes story with emails indicating the purpose was to get dirt on Hillary Jul 19 - Trump's secret meeting with Putin revealed. Trump claims it was about "adoption." In retrospect, Trump was likely trying to "get their stories straight" to avoid scrutiny. We now have a president who colludes with Putin to avoid being held responsible for his administration's actions - and then uses his position to try to get Russia off the hook for what they did. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,341 #4240 January 16, 2019 QuoteYet again we have a post that says or States that Trump has done something that's illegal and should be taken care of. The point of my post regarding this is you didn't care when Hillary or Obama did it! Not that they did it first like the spin Master Bill likes to post That is simply not true. It was investigated and determination flowed from that. This is how it should work. In your case you believe that your side should not be investigated. You have even started to believe in a made up entity, the Deep State, to explain away any negative outcome from that investigation. Yet, somehow I don't think you can "see" the difference. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #4241 January 17, 2019 Giuliani gives up on the "there was no collusion!" story: ========= Giuliani: You just misstated my position. I never said there no collusion between the campaign, or between people in the campaign. Cuomo: Yes you have. Giuliani: I have not. I said the president of the United States. There is not a single bit of evidence the president of the United States committed the only crime you could commit here, conspiring with the Russians to hack the DNC. . . . Giuliani: He said "he didn't." He didn't say "nobody from his campaign . . ." Cuomo: He actually said that. Giuliani: Well, he never said that as far as I know. ========== Trumpies will have to find another reverse gear on their excusemobile. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JerryBaumchen 1,318 #4242 January 17, 2019 Hi Bill, QuoteGiuliani: Well, he never said that as far as I know. And Nixon told Erlichmann & Haldeman that the Watergate witnesses could always say, 'I don't remember.' Jerry Baumchen Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,408 #4243 January 17, 2019 billvon Giuliani: He said "he didn't." He didn't say "nobody from his campaign . . ." Cuomo: He actually said that. Giuliani: Well, he never said that as far as I know. Did Giuliani just redefine "never" as "less than 100 times a year"?Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tkhayes 305 #4244 January 17, 2019 On 1/10/2019 at 6:48 PM, rushmc said: One thing's for sure. I'm looking forward to the changes coming to this site! "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln that is true, but it will not be from some constitutional ideology differences or right versus left. It will be a French Revolution event based on wealth and opportunity inequality. 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,882 #4245 January 18, 2019 (edited) Oooh: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/trump-russia-cohen-moscow-tower-mueller-investigation?ref=hpsplash And more Oooh:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cohen/ex-trump-lawyer-rigging-polls-was-at-the-direction-of-trump-idUSKCN1PB1PZ Edited January 18, 2019 by kallend 1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DJL 235 #4246 January 18, 2019 5 hours ago, kallend said: Oooh: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonleopold/trump-russia-cohen-moscow-tower-mueller-investigation?ref=hpsplash And more Oooh:https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-cohen/ex-trump-lawyer-rigging-polls-was-at-the-direction-of-trump-idUSKCN1PB1PZ The key part of this is: "The special counsel’s office learned about Trump’s directive for Cohen to lie to Congress through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents. Cohen then acknowledged those instructions during his interviews with that office." This is no longer "Cohen says". "Cohen says" doesn't stand up in court. Independent interviews, emails, text messages and documents is admissible. Now what? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,108 #4247 January 18, 2019 19 minutes ago, DJL said: The key part of this is: "The special counsel’s office learned about Trump’s directive for Cohen to lie to Congress through interviews with multiple witnesses from the Trump Organization and internal company emails, text messages, and a cache of other documents. Cohen then acknowledged those instructions during his interviews with that office." This is no longer "Cohen says". "Cohen says" doesn't stand up in court. Independent interviews, emails, text messages and documents is admissible. Now what? Equally important was that Ivanka, trump Jr. were also briefed, aware and participatory in the Moscow trump Tower dealings. What Cohen represents in testimony in the House, Congress and trial(s). Is likely to just carry less weight than the e-mails and internal trump corporation documents. It takes but minutes at trial to destroy President trump's credibility given his propensity to lie. IMO its important to hold the other participants in these crimes to account. The trump family. Donald Jr. testified under oath. I'm not sure if Ivanka did or not? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,341 #4248 January 18, 2019 59 minutes ago, DJL said: This is no longer "Cohen says". "Cohen says" doesn't stand up in court. Independent interviews, emails, text messages and documents is admissible. Now what? Now what is indeed the big question. Nobody has been able to verify this yet, but if this report is true there is no doubt that Trump is a criminal. Even Barr will have a hard time arguing around this, since he was specifically asked during his hearing if the president influencing somebody to change their testimony would be obstruction. He confirmed. (the timing of those very specific questions are interesting to me) Switched to Fox News a couple of times yesterday and this morning, they were not discussing this report at all. Even on their website it is not the leading story. The reaction of the GOP is going to be telling today. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #4249 January 18, 2019 3 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: The reaction of the GOP is going to be telling today. I predict a whole lot of: 1)"FAKE NEWS!" "Cohen is lying." "Trump didn't do it." "Nose ring something something." 2) "OK maybe he did something like that but it's not that bad." 3) "Obama did it first." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 1,108 #4250 January 18, 2019 (edited) 46 minutes ago, SkyDekker said: Now what is indeed the big question. Nobody has been able to verify this yet, but if this report is true there is no doubt that Trump is a criminal. Even Barr will have a hard time arguing around this, since he was specifically asked during his hearing if the president influencing somebody to change their testimony would be obstruction. He confirmed. (the timing of those very specific questions are interesting to me) Switched to Fox News a couple of times yesterday and this morning, they were not discussing this report at all. Even on their website it is not the leading story. The reaction of the GOP is going to be telling today. Take your cue from FOX. Cohen is a convicted liar, Russia could have hacked trump Corporation e-mails to discredit trump personally. trump is not responsible for what Cohen says because Cohen "hardly ever worked for me". The deep state could have fabricated those documents. Trump calls Cohen a liar after bombshell BuzzFeed report ...Help me here Marc & Ron. Edited January 18, 2019 by Phil1111 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
This Site Is For Sale
.thumb.jpg.4bb795e2eaf21b8b300039a5e1ec7f92.jpg)