kallend 1,623 #151 December 15, 2016 rushmcAs per normal. No content post from you. So you ARE unaware that the Trumps are suing the Daily Mail for spreading false news. A double irony there.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #152 December 15, 2016 So how do feel being duped by this fake news story?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #153 December 15, 2016 >No, silly. Fake news is anything he disagrees with. It's fun watching the right wing meltdown over this. "CIA investigation revealed Putin worked to sway US election" - what BS! What, like the CIA knows what's going on? You Trump haters are all sore losers! "Infowars claims that Clinton is running a child sex ring in the basement of a local pizza place" - WHAT? We need an investigation immediately! This is serious. She's going to jail this time! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,384 #154 December 15, 2016 billvon It's fun watching the right wing meltdown over this. Remember the past when the self-described "conservative right wing" actually had intellectuals who could hold a debate using reasoning, instead of childish name-calling? I miss those days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley_Jr."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #155 December 15, 2016 billvon>No, silly. Fake news is anything he disagrees with. It's fun watching the right wing meltdown over this. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZsBrab9TYI Somebody is melted down, but I don't think it is on the right. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #156 December 15, 2016 billvon >No, silly. Fake news is anything he disagrees with. It's fun watching the right wing meltdown over this. "CIA investigation revealed Putin worked to sway US election" - what BS! What, like the CIA knows what's going on? You Trump haters are all sore losers! "Infowars claims that Clinton is running a child sex ring in the basement of a local pizza place" - WHAT? We need an investigation immediately! This is serious. She's going to jail this time! THE RIGHT MELTDOWN? "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #157 December 15, 2016 brenthutch ***>No, silly. Fake news is anything he disagrees with. It's fun watching the right wing meltdown over this. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=4ZsBrab9TYI Somebody is melted down, but I don't think it is on the right. The cry babies denial on display! "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #158 December 15, 2016 QuoteRemember the past when the self-described "conservative right wing" actually had intellectuals who could hold a debate using reasoning, instead of childish name-calling? That was back before intellectuals (i.e. those clueless ivory-tower elites) became the enemy of the right. Now it's the party of Trump, Sarah Palin, GW Bush and Joe the Plumber. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #159 December 15, 2016 billvonQuoteRemember the past when the self-described "conservative right wing" actually had intellectuals who could hold a debate using reasoning, instead of childish name-calling? That was back before intellectuals (i.e. those clueless ivory-tower elites) became the enemy of the right. Now it's the party of Trump, Sarah Palin, GW Bush and Joe the Plumber. you have to wonder why those sexist, racist, red neck, hateful wingers started name calling ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DanG 1 #160 December 15, 2016 Both sides have been name calling each other since language was invented. The hypocrisy is when one side says that they only name call because the other side did it first. Bullshit. Both sides act like children, and neither one started it. - Dan G Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #161 December 15, 2016 billvonQuoteRemember the past when the self-described "conservative right wing" actually had intellectuals who could hold a debate using reasoning, instead of childish name-calling? That was back before intellectuals (i.e. those clueless ivory-tower elites) became the enemy of the right. Now it's the party of Trump, Sarah Palin, GW Bush and Joe the Plumber. And they beat the party of effete privilege checking urbanites, trannies, illegals, and participation trophy winners. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,912 #162 December 15, 2016 billvonQuoteRemember the past when the self-described "conservative right wing" actually had intellectuals who could hold a debate using reasoning, instead of childish name-calling? That was back before intellectuals (i.e. those clueless ivory-tower elites) became the enemy of the right. Now it's the party of Trump, Sarah Palin, GW Bush and Joe the Plumber. That's the difference between "right wing" and conservative. The right wing is going to spend the next 4 years defending their guy no matter what. All the while he will be violating all or at least most of what they claim are their principles. But he is their guy because he brings them power. Conservatives on the other hand are quietly going about the business of reclaiming the R party and working to keep it from being ruined.Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 911 #163 December 15, 2016 DanGBoth sides have been name calling each other since language was invented. The hypocrisy is when one side says that they only name call because the other side did it first. Bullshit. Both sides act like children, and neither one started it. Twenty years ago it wasn't this bad. There are lots of right wing intellectuals. Some of them allowed the right to win control of the house and the senate in the US only a month ago. trump has a very good nominee for defense in Mattis. Gary Cohn is no dummy either. Hopefully they can control trumps nutty ideas. Back to Russia. "Limbaugh: No one can prove Russia hacked election Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh challenged a CIA report that concluded Russia interfered with the 2016 election to sway results in President-elect Donald Trump’s favor. "Nobody can provide any evidence that the Russians hacked the election," he said on Wednesday, as reported by the Washington Examiner. Details of the CIA’s secret assessment were first revealed in a Washington Post story last week. The FBI presented a more “fuzzy” and “ambiguous" judgment about the interference, the Post reported." http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/310526-limbaugh-no-one-can-prove-russia-hacked-election In Limbaughs defense no one considers him a intellectual or smart in his views or opinions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #164 December 15, 2016 >And they beat the party of effete privilege checking urbanites, trannies, illegals, and participation > trophy winners. Thank you for proving my point. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #165 December 15, 2016 QuoteConservatives on the other hand are quietly going about the business of reclaiming the R party and working to keep it from being ruined. It would be nice if that happened - but I have my doubts. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #166 December 15, 2016 billvon >And they beat the party of effete privilege checking urbanites, trannies, illegals, and participation > trophy winners. Thank you for proving my point. And tree huggers, I forgot tree huggers. Seriously though, why are you wasting so much bandwidth on this? Do you really think the Electoral College is going to elect HRC? Good luck with that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #167 December 15, 2016 brenthutchSeriously though, why are you wasting so much bandwidth on this? Do you really think the Electoral College is going to elect HRC? Because if it can happen once, it can happen again and with even worse consequences. Regardless no matter what you believe about candidate A vs B, this issue should transcend that.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #168 December 15, 2016 DanGBoth sides have been name calling each other since language was invented. The hypocrisy is when one side says that they only name call because the other side did it first. Bullshit. Both sides act like children, and neither one started it. ^ this another hypocrisy is when one side simply states their labels are true, so it's not the same as the other guys who just need to admit they are less human than everyone else ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #169 December 15, 2016 quade***Seriously though, why are you wasting so much bandwidth on this? Do you really think the Electoral College is going to elect HRC? Because if it can happen once, it can happen again and with even worse consequences. Regardless no matter what you believe about candidate A vs B, this issue should transcend that. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME Replace "gambling" with "disrupting" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #170 December 15, 2016 brenthutch ******Seriously though, why are you wasting so much bandwidth on this? Do you really think the Electoral College is going to elect HRC? Because if it can happen once, it can happen again and with even worse consequences. Regardless no matter what you believe about candidate A vs B, this issue should transcend that. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME Replace "gambling" with "disrupting" OMG! What film is that? I've never seen it before. No. I'm not, "Shocked! Shocked!" Russia would attempt to sway the election just as I'm not so naive as to believe the US hasn't attempted to do so in countless other elections around the world. That said, even though the US has dropped two nuclear weapons on countries before, I think we should do everything in our power to ensure no nuclear weapons are ever dropped on us.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Elisha 1 #171 December 15, 2016 Bring your popcorn.... This opinion piece is awesome. I love this turnabout quote: "Even if the Russians did want Trump to win, what difference, at this point, does it make?" http://www.nationalreview.com/article/443034/russia-election-hacking-charge-vladimir-putin-influence-american-elections Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gowlerk 1,912 #172 December 15, 2016 This is just more right wing poor winner stuff. The left gets it. The D's and no one else who matters are asking for a do over. We know Putin or his friends did not decide the election and that Americans did. It still needs looking into though. Can't the National Review just accept the win and move on?Always remember the brave children who died defending your right to bear arms. Freedom is not free. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 383 #173 December 15, 2016 My favorite, "Democrats, moreover, conveniently forget that they’ve historically welcomed such mischief-making — such as when Jimmy Carter pleaded with Leonid Brezhnev for Soviet help in the futile effort to defeat Ronald Reagan in 1980 and when Ted Kennedy pleaded with Yuri Andropov for Soviet help in the futile effort to defeat Reagan in 1984." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #174 December 15, 2016 QuoteI love this turnabout quote: "Even if the Russians did want Trump to win, what difference, at this point, does it make?" I see a pattern here. "The Russians did not influence the election! There's no proof." "OK so maybe the Russians had some influence on the election, but what difference does it make?" Next up: "OK so maybe the Russians had some influence on the election, and maybe it will make a difference - but the differences will all be good." Where have I seen that pattern of denial before? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Phil1111 911 #175 December 15, 2016 gowlerkThis is just more right wing poor winner stuff. The left gets it. The D's and no one else who matters are asking for a do over. We know Putin or his friends did not decide the election and that Americans did. It still needs looking into though. Can't the National Review just accept the win and move on? Bill Buckley is the founder the National Review and I used to read it regularly. He is one of the best authors and writers I've ever read. This is a great book he wrote: https://www.amazon.com/Airborne-Sentimental-William-F-Buckley/dp/0316114391 and it was a thoroughly enjoyable read. The National Review needs to get back to fundamental policies of conservative national interest. Here is a good read which suggest that Bill Buckley personally started the downfall of US political discussion and the news coverage in the US. http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/william-buckley-gore-vidal-debates-1968-121009?o=1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites