skipbelt

it's amazing and entertaining to see stubbornness and a modicum of intellect be derailed into alternate realities !

who after proving continues investigating ? i am reminded of a man looking for lost keys outside at night !

I presume this is a consequence of this year's Burning Man. Thousands of Rhys's came back with their 'rental' gear. And I'm sure the hippie crowd said the same thing - evil Walmart deserves to be taken advantage of. yes , the man who conceived and founded it was from a red state !

darn it all , sisyphus reference rings a bell , but now i have to look it up to refresh my memory !

so what did newton set when he put these laws on paper...? I see you have lost traction with you point and have resorted to the usual ancillairy points, to evade the inevitable. Evasion? Are you shitting me? In case you forgot what you wrote that I replied to: "Though there are probably several problems with that concept as fire damage is not symmetrical and this tyoe of falure is inprecedented," You know damn well that you were not talking about the continuing collapse and your stupid little 3rd Law guff - you were talking about the initial collapse of the impact and fire damaged floors. You also know damn well what the word 'precedent' means, but just to make sure, I refer you again to my 3 step plan. maybe he doesn't know , maybe he knows but it doesn't fit his agenda /beliefs/feelings !

so what did newton set when he put these laws on paper...? I see you have lost traction with you point and have resorted to the usual ancillairy points, to evade the inevitable. newtons laws had precedent , even before the apple landed on his head !

by embargo do you mean refusing any export from them ? wouldn't they have to export the woman after making bail to complete your assertion ?

Prove it. for those who believe no proof is necessary for those who don't believe no proof is possible attribution on request human existence is IMPOSSIBLE without faith !

Precisely which then renders Bills' calulation useless. did you mean calculation ? - spelling yank !

you seem to be ignoring other legitimate explanations for what you assert happened !

sam walton was from a red state , as for knowing what rhys is talking about , does anyone ?

cold war - the war Ronald Reagan didn't fight and didn't win according to you !

people with real tight grips on real empty bags resent it being brought to their attention !

suddenly rhys' interest in higher taxes begins to make sense , libs love to spend opm. plus many libs especially in the current administration also believe other people should pay higher taxes , while they cheat on theirs. it really pays double dividends to be a lib !

Why don't you explain that simple fundamental misrepresentaion buy refuting david chandlers comprehensive report, rather than comparing to a toe and a hammer. I do not claim to be a scientist or an engineer. I used the jenga blocks as a simple example of how the path of greatest resistance will alter the trajectory of a falling object. very simple. Your toe and hammer point proved nothing. what is the temperature of a turbine engines combustor components in a 757 at takeoff power ? just a ballpark estimate would suffice . this answer will shed light on the 500º estimate by the truthers. but the truthers won't like it.

Like building a mosque near the 9/11 New York City site, with overtones of muslim conquest? a lot of wisdom in this post , i would have attempted to be more confrontational , instead of near near............, i would have substituted on ground zero , instead of overtones i would have substituted overt provocations such as cordoba initiative . the constitution is not a suicide pact !

You do give a fuck to have yoru 2 cents aired or you wouldn't be here. And Mike and anyone else is right, what you're trying to pose is an ad hominem: Lucky... doesn't even jump, so how is his position relevant? You should head back to the jumping part of the forum then. What you're also saying is: Hey Mike, we're neo-cons, we are supposed to support each other reagardless, right? Maybe Mike isn't as much of a neo-con after that. SO here's to you and your cheerleading: YAY TAX CUTS http://images.paraorkut.com/...heerleader-12791.jpg YAY! there you go again , it's like you can't help yourself ! ever read sun tzu ?

so you looked up ad hominum , now you know what it means , now maybe when you call for avoiding ad hominum attacks against you , you will extend the favor to everyone else !

did you mean biological ? 30 sounds good till i moved into a house next door to 2 forty year olds living with their working mother . caveat 30 and on your own ! We've had spelling Nazis come and spelling Nazis go, they are all as needless the ones before them. you have a nazi fetish ?

Preemptive strike. good call ! btw that book was 1 of a handful i started , struggled to get half read and quit. could reflect on me , more likely on l ron hubbard . the only other was helter skelter by vincent bugliosi , much better DA than author imho !

Perhaps a flying fuck.............. but then again, I don't think so. at a rolling doughnut ? down a cobblestone street ?

You're right - much better to raise taxes and have businesses downsize/close/move overseas to try to remain solvent.... all of which reduces gov't revenue in the triple whammy of lost business tax, lost income tax from the workers and reduced economic activity because the workers can't afford to buy shit anymore. Brilliant plan, that. BRAVO , but how did you formulate that reply without reference to post 59 !

did you mean biological ? 30 sounds good till i moved into a house next door to 2 forty year olds living with their working mother . caveat 30 and on your own !

billvon , i see an opportunity for agreement , i admire your passion for treatments to these afflictions you list , my point is it's abundantly more likely adult stem cell treatments will address these afflictions , obviating the need for embryotics given their respective track records , hence killing 2 birds with 1 stone !

So you would generally agree that it is acceptable to disagree with a law and still follow it? your debating skills are quite formidable , enjoying them immensely , do continue!