skipbelt

did you READ reply #404 , or ignore it ? my money's on ignore !

did you mean borneo ?

there has been an argument by some that muslims meeting at a location to worship makes it a mosque , it is a weak argument at best. how about something more compelling ?

by fascist you mean muslim ?

moonwalking made popular by a white guy who used to be black is characterized by retreating but giving the appearrance of advancing , also an appropriate metaphor in debate , now get to getting !

almost everything about americans is used by muslims as propaganda to advance their agenda !

you have my gratitude for proving my point , you do know how to moonwalk , don't you ?

this is good stuff right here, kudos and BZ !!!

the religion of peacers met at strip clubs to plan and conspire the 9/11 attacks. this was ordered by their spiritual leader to advance their religion. they were there to worship no doubt , now i would appreciate some moonwalking !

maybe an ordained minister , but not a priest , surely , and don't call me surely , really not too sure about ordained either , ordained by who/whom ?

HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. this is good stuff right here , some body repair shops use hammers designed to repair autobodies to damage them and run up the repair bill surreptitiously . they rename their hammers " moneymakers "

one glaring difference is muslim extremists are directed by muslim clerics , christian extremists operate in contravention to christian clerics !

please indulge me as i try to follow liberal logic . any meeting place for religious purposes then becomes an established building of worship ? a bunch of those religion of peacers met frequently at strip clubs !

AND mosques ?

AND 373 ?

would SOMEONE please quote reply 366 ?

would SOMEONE please quote reply 16 ?

if you're ABSOLUTELY serious i'll explain the difference , but i doubt it , more likely it's a straw man argument , sleight of hand , misdirection , unless it's a potstir , in that case well done !

I'd rather our money not be spent on corporate welfare, but it's a more complex issue than simply my wishes. You are correct when you say that she ranks her own private aircraft. Your argument falls apart when you say she ranks a 757. A Gulf stream III is just fine. Are you really going to try to tell me that she is in danger when she stops at an Air Force base to refuel? WHY would she have to refuel? EXACTLY ! with the libs it's never what's right or wrong , it's what's on the agenda ! her agenda is a heavy coating of gold on her assets. and i would appreciate any further comments on this topic refer back to my PREVIOUS post . impeccable if i do say so myself !

See. How many have a plane like hers? Pretty much every Speaker of the House since airplanes have been a common means of transportations. The seat she occupies is 3rd in line of succession; it's not unreasonable. REALLY? Not unreasonable? Correct, my green friend. As odious as it might be to you personally, if something ever happens to the President and Vice President, people are going to want the 3rd in line to be safe and not have to refuel on her way back from her home state en route to the nation's capital. It's not about the Person; it's about the chair she sits in and the chair she has the potential to sit in. If people can't see that, I can't help them. Her supporters are beyond help, I agree. As I said, it's not about the person; it's about the chair. and our money . . . or rather money that could go to welfare . . . you forget to mention queen pelosi attended sam houston institute (of) technology ! as for queen pelosi being 3rd in line ? shouldn't she wait to get to number one before getting presidential perqs? as far as i'm concerned she's number two. by the way the gulfstream III's range is intercontinental , so trans continental is no problem . the problem is she wanted to take her royal entourage . you know like they do in air force 1 ?

Not average . . . Moderate . . . FIFY.

all analogies have shortcomings , that one is paraplegic . ground zero is any real property damaged by the terrorist attack , remember the practitioners of the religion of peace ? those mosque builders. this is why we can't have an honest debate . libs won't even concede BLATENT dishonesty when it's pointed out to them. unless you're a potstirrer , in that case touche !

absolutely disagree , it's alot more like yelling theatre in a crowded fire station !

Frank! Ok, why in the hell is this thread in SC?? It belongs in... HERE It's because some people here need to lighten up, pull the politi-stick out of their ass, and grow a sense of humor. to quote the original star trek episode eden " amen brother " as far as a sense of humor i'm in a terroristic rage because no one got my escar go rejoinder. i have made up my mind to form a religion based on this where myself or those i appoint will issue edicts to wreak havoc on anyone who would question or derrogate my religion . and there are no innocent bystanders , especially if they are too close to the aforementioned ! infidel , seems someone beat me to it. Oh the irony of that previous sentence !

of course it is. careful with exponents , the wrong one can diminish , exponentially !