Tim-O-T 0 #576 May 10, 2009 Yes, but you need to specifically request it - this is what I did. Couldn't decide between a top or side mount . No extra cost, unless you want a spare zkulls male connector. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skydave103 0 #577 May 13, 2009 Just got mine this evening!! didn't know fed-ex does go arounds! Stopped by earlier in the day (I was @ work) and I get home at 9 and he pulls up! Gotta love that! Now.......how does this damn thing work?! jkLifeshouldNOTbeajourneytothegravewithawellpreservedbody,buttskidinsideways,cigarinone hand,martiniintheother,bodythoroughlyused upandscreaming:"WOO HOO!! What a ride!!!" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kusi 0 #578 May 15, 2009 Just finished ;) I jumped the Rawa for four years with a sony pc104. Now it's time to change the "resolution" to the cx100 Zero jumps with the new combination but I think, it works Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #579 May 15, 2009 Did you sow up the velcro strap on the box? I did, don't trust it like it is and it doesn't need to be adjustable. Why did you go with a single element lens if you're topmounting anyway? ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kusi 0 #580 May 15, 2009 I'm not sure, if I understand what you mean exactly, but... - velcro strap: If you mean the velcro strap for holding the box-door closed...I think it doesn't need more, because it's hardly impossible that the box-door can open alone. However: the cx100 is fixed with a big fat screw single element lens: I used the old wide-eye from my old pc104 (same diameter of the winding). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #581 May 16, 2009 The strap has velcro on it that can come lose I think, which is why all my tonfly boxes have had their straps sewn so it cannot work itself lose. I don't have screws in my cameras so the strap is all that holds the camera to my helmet, plus usually 2 extra velcro straps that are on my helmet anyway. The lens, i'd buy a raynox 3032 or 5050 if I were you, and sell this lens, as the single element lens is a shame to use on a HD camera (it brings the image quality way down) especially since you topmount it anyway. ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kusi 0 #582 May 16, 2009 It sounds fascinating how you hold your camera in the box :) My reason for using screws: Prevention of vibrations. I think, if the box is open I also can jump. I will not lose the camera. Any pictures of your helmet? I used 5 screws. 4 screws for fixing the box and the camera-screw. All of this screws I can releasing inside of my helmet. You are right with the lense! But first I have to put money aside ;) For the first time it will be enough. Minimum wide-eye ;) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shamanski 0 #583 May 16, 2009 i waiting my cx100 tonfly box and how i see from ur photos this box is too large to fix it side mount? right? i have the same rawa helmet Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ORGASMO 0 #584 May 17, 2009 Hey all Sorry if this has been answered already, but I couldn't read 24 pages of posts today.Has anyone any experience using a CX100 on PAL systems in Europe? If there are limitations what are they? My previous experience with NTSC cameras in Europe has been that they play directly through most PAL T.V. and DVD players.As far as editing goes, doesn't adobe premier have a solution/option for selecting the format? Thanks Mike ORGASMO RODRIGUEZ If your gunna be dumb You better be tough Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pierre3636 0 #585 May 17, 2009 QuoteMaybe this is a bit off-topic. Anyone bought the Tonfly box for this cam? Does it come with both top and side mounting on the same box? So you don't need to buy two boxes one for top mounting and one for side mounting. i do its a great solution - if you need pictures pm me ~ time is ~ time was ~ times past ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ruant 0 #586 May 19, 2009 So I've decided to buy this one too :) I'm also getting a brand new Tonfly CC1 helmet :) since i don't have a proper video helmet since I'm new to the video part of this lovely sport :) I know it's been talked about before what wide angle lens that's best but i gotta ask again. For me as a newcomer what should i pick? I'm gonna do both FF and FS with it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Teigen 0 #587 May 20, 2009 Got my Raynox HD-3032 Pro today, did some test shots in my livingroom and posted a vid in HD on youtube.. CLICKY I really recommend you see it in HD! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pbwing 0 #588 May 21, 2009 Great video. Best part...when you open the box and toss the instructions aside!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Steve_Lewis 0 #589 May 21, 2009 QuoteHey all Sorry if this has been answered already, but I couldn't read 24 pages of posts today.Has anyone any experience using a CX100 on PAL systems in Europe? If there are limitations what are they? My previous experience with NTSC cameras in Europe has been that they play directly through most PAL T.V. and DVD players.As far as editing goes, doesn't adobe premier have a solution/option for selecting the format? Thanks Mike (upthread it says): The only difference to the two cameras is the CX100 is 60Hz interlaced video, and the 105 /"100 PAL/Euro edition" (whatever) is 50Hz interlaced (60i and 50i respectively). I'm also interested in any experiences of trying the 100 in Europe, as the 100 on B&H is about $150 cheaper than the 100E, which would be nice! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ironmule 0 #590 June 6, 2009 Here it is... TonFly Fulkron + Box (Zkulls) black matt Sony cx-100e Century .55 lens HypEye D Pro Cut-away system Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tim-O-T 0 #591 June 10, 2009 Here are some pics of my setup: Tonfly CC1 with double Zkulls connectors for both top and side mounting. Helmet feels very lob-sided with side-mounting though - I'll only use like this if I put a still camera on top. Lens is a Century 0.3x baby death - plenty of space for it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
freefalljason 0 #592 June 10, 2009 Please forgive my ignorance but, what is the red loop coming out of the helmet behind the box? I am assuming that it's the release for the Zkulls. BTW that's one of the smoothest and safest set-ups that I have seen. Thanks and Blue Skies, Jason Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dragon2 2 #593 June 10, 2009 QuoteBTW that's one of the smoothest and safest set-ups that I have seen. Not when it's sidemounted it's not. ciel bleu, Saskia Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
likestojump 3 #594 June 10, 2009 at the risk of sounding like a topmount Nazi : that sidemount looks snagga-lisious ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ORGASMO 0 #595 June 10, 2009 I'll only use like this if I put a still camera on top ------------------------------------------------------------ A friend and I were talking and are thinking that with HD cameras like this, why couldn't you eliminate the need/use of a dedicated stills camera.You can pull stills from anywhere on the HD video that would be suitable for blowing up to 8"X10" with quality probably as good as any stills camera. Has anyone been doing this.It would seem logical and safer due to the compact size of the CX100 to have ONLY this camera on the top of your head. Limitations may be quality and size for publishing purposes, however should be adequate for a Tandem customer video/stills package....... Any thoughts on this from the camera/video geeks? ORGASMO RODRIGUEZ If your gunna be dumb You better be tough Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PharmerPhil 0 #596 June 10, 2009 Quote...with quality probably as good as any stills camera. Not even close IMHO. Lots of reasons why (and most of them already discussed here), but the two biggest reasons in my opinion are poor lenses and small imaging sensors. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ORGASMO 0 #597 June 10, 2009 Thanks Phil, as I said in an earlier post, I didn't have the heart to read 24 pages of posts......So even with a better lens, the small imaging sensors would limit the quality so that stills pulled from the HD video wouldn't even be usable/suitable for a Tandem customer stills picture 8x10 or smaller? ORGASMO RODRIGUEZ If your gunna be dumb You better be tough Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,879 #598 June 10, 2009 >You can pull stills from anywhere on the HD video that would be suitable > for blowing up to 8"X10" . . . Not really. At best you might get reasonable 3x5" prints with a good lens (i.e. Raynox) but you're still not even approaching the quality of even a cheap point and shoot. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PharmerPhil 0 #599 June 10, 2009 QuoteSo even with a better lens, the small imaging sensors... And keep in mind that a "better lens" doesn't really help. What we put on video cameras are really lens adapters (as opposed to the dedicated lenses that are on SLRs). They don't replace the permanent lens that is on the video camera, they just add to it. And the weakest link theory dictates that you will never really improve the lens that is on the camera resolution- or clarity-wise. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ORGASMO 0 #600 June 11, 2009 Thanks guys, I guess I'll go back to the things I know, (as soon as I find out what they are) and leave the photography thinking for others who do know. ORGASMO RODRIGUEZ If your gunna be dumb You better be tough Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
