3 3
brenthutch

Socialism v Capitalism

Recommended Posts

(edited)
21 hours ago, SkyDekker said:

What does the D in DPRK stand for?

I was still a kid when I figured out that a reliable way to identify which countries on a map were autocracies, just by looking for the ones that contained 2 or 3 of the words "democratic",  "peoples", "republic", or "socialist" in their official names.

Edited by ryoder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Show me a socialist government that is working or has worked.

Ours.

Military - socialist.
State health care (Medicare/Medicaid) - socialist.
Police and fire - socialist (mostly.)
Public utilities - socialist (mostly.)
CDC, FAA, air traffic control, FEMA, FBI, CIA - socialist.
Roads - socialist.

The reason our country works so well is we take bits and pieces of all the other systems out there.  We have a democracy, but not a pure one (we use representation.)  We don't have a king but we have a president who is a lot more powerful than a prime minister.  We have a capitalist consumer economy, but a socialist set of public welfare organizations.  We have a communist national park system but we often charge admission.

Any one of those ideologies is toxic by itself.  By blending them we reduce the toxicity.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, ryoder said:

I was still a kid when I figured out that a reliable way to identify which countries on a map were autocracies, just by looking for the ones that contained 2 or 3 of the words "democratic",  "peoples", or "republic", in their official names.

Upon entering the USSR we were lectured on how such Bourgeois institutions as tipping were considered offensive to the proud residents of the Socialist Worker's Paradise.

At dinner, my father tipped just like he would have in New York.

Any time that we showed up thereafter, the staff were tripping over each other in order to serve him.

So much for being insulted by a generous tip.

In a 'free market economy' the best you can hope for from the government is an impartial referee.  If governmental employees have skin in the game, it becomes corrupt immediately.

You can quibble all you want about the definitions of various systems of government, but I'll take Switzerland over Venezuela any day.

 

BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, billvon said:

Ours.

Military - socialist.
State health care (Medicare/Medicaid) - socialist.
Police and fire - socialist (mostly.)
Public utilities - socialist (mostly.)
CDC, FAA, air traffic control, FEMA, FBI, CIA - socialist.
Roads - socialist.

The reason our country works so well is we take bits and pieces of all the other systems out there.  We have a democracy, but not a pure one (we use representation.)  We don't have a king but we have a president who is a lot more powerful than a prime minister.  We have a capitalist consumer economy, but a socialist set of public welfare organizations.  We have a communist national park system but we often charge admission.

Any one of those ideologies is toxic by itself.  By blending them we reduce the toxicity.

Now of the things on your list are socialist.  They are paid for by taxes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, airdvr said:

Now of the things on your list are socialist.  They are paid for by taxes.

Yes.  That's how socialism works.

Here's a real world example.  Republicans in Virginia want more free stuff for their roads.  They want to abolish tolls.  To make it easier to not pay parking tickets or fines.  To reduce fees of all sorts on motorists.  At one point they even mention that money for law enforcement on roads "should be funded from general taxes" instead of from fees lawbreakers pay.

In other words, to do what every Republican dreams of - get more free stuff, break the law, not be held accountable and have someone else pay for it all.

https://dailytorch.com/2022/01/an-open-letter-to-virginia-republican-lawmakers-in-support-of-a-motorist-bill-of-rights/?fbclid=IwAR1AzUTkuD8NbsgIzZV23ksKpvIQhFMWysj_JOL2JLUdvFbUxUSKXijgsNM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

Have you ever heard the term "mixed economy"? Show me a pure capitalist economy that works. 

Yep.  Even the most capitalist country in the world - Singapore - has a large amount of socialist government supports for industry and its people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, billvon said:

Ours.

Military - socialist.
State health care (Medicare/Medicaid) - socialist.
Police and fire - socialist (mostly.)
Public utilities - socialist (mostly.)
CDC, FAA, air traffic control, FEMA, FBI, CIA - socialist.
Roads - socialist.

The reason our country works so well is we take bits and pieces of all the other systems out there.  We have a democracy, but not a pure one (we use representation.)  We don't have a king but we have a president who is a lot more powerful than a prime minister.  We have a capitalist consumer economy, but a socialist set of public welfare organizations.  We have a communist national park system but we often charge admission.

Any one of those ideologies is toxic by itself.  By blending them we reduce the toxicity.

Agreed on all of that except the first word.. 'Ours'. As others have pointed out; none of that makes the US a 'socialist government' per the correct definition. Therefore, if yourself or others are arguing that 'republicans think all of the above are bad because they incorporate socialist concepts' then that's sounding like a strawman.

I suspect the original point of the OP is perhaps that this 'blend' (as a reference to your 'blending them') may be changing, specifically in a negative direction.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, metalslug said:

Agreed on all of that except the first word.. 'Ours'. As others have pointed out; none of that makes the US a 'socialist government' per the correct definition. 

Nor does it make it a "capitalist government."  It has elements of both.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, airdvr said:

You're confusing economies,,,deliberately too.

Nope.  Capitalism is both a political and economic system.  So is socialism.  So is communism.  

I put "capitalist government" in quotes because such a term is woefully incomplete, as is "socialist government."   We have elements of both.

As MS posited, "this 'blend' may be changing."  That is quite true; it changes all the time.  We now have much stricter limits on welfare, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately the US healthcare "system", run along capitalist lines, has MUCH poorer outcomes than the socialist systems found in every other developed nation.  We rank even below some second world nations in things like infant mortality, maternal mortality, and life expectancy.

But you know that and choose to ignore it.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, kallend said:

Unfortunately the US healthcare "system", run along capitalist lines, has MUCH poorer outcomes than the socialist systems found in every other developed nation.  We rank even below some second world nations in things like infant mortality, maternal mortality, and life expectancy.

But you know that and choose to ignore it.

Hi John,

For too many people, ignorance is bliss.

Jerry Baumchen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, kallend said:

Unfortunately the US healthcare "system", run along capitalist lines, has MUCH poorer outcomes than the socialist systems found in every other developed nation.  We rank even below some second world nations in things like infant mortality, maternal mortality, and life expectancy.

But you know that and choose to ignore it.

So we're switching to healthcare now?  I'm in agreement that the US system needs to move to single payer.  Wouldn't make us a socialist country however.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, airdvr said:

So we're switching to healthcare now?  I'm in agreement that the US system needs to move to single payer.  Wouldn't make us a socialist country however.

Exactly!  It would merely make it more socialist than it is now.  And it would be an improvement.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, airdvr said:

The original question was S v C.  Probably too vague for it to not wander off like it has.

Well, the original post was not a question; it was an Internet meme that purported that city centers in capitalist countries look better than city centers in communist countries.

Of course, you could find similar pictures of the USSR where in 1980 it looked great and today looks like a dystopian nightmare.  Around Ukraine, for example.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Communism is an outdated concept. As the has been communist states have mostly morphed into autocracies. Russia, China, Cuba as examples. There is no longer voting within the systems to elect the equivalent of a politburo. Now its all to protect the insiders who are rewarded with cash.

On the flip side capitalism has morphed a bit as well. The GOP for example uses tax statutes to protect special interest groups. Those groups then reward the insiders(politicians) with cash. The party gerrymanders....We all know the rest as Lord Acton suggested.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

3 3