mirage62 0 #901 May 21, 2015 I know it's here SOMEWHERE, but wasn't the judges ruling suppose to out by the 22? Frankly I've become a little obsessed with this case. It has all the parts of a great story - depending on who's side your on. Local land owners rights abused by greedy business owner with aggressive customers...... Business owner rights abused by a crazy vindictive person... I know which side I'm on Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theonlyski 3 #902 May 21, 2015 mirage62 I know it's here SOMEWHERE, but wasn't the judges ruling suppose to out by the 22? Yes, which is tomorrow."I may be a dirty pirate hooker...but I'm not about to go stand on the corner." iluvtofly DPH -7, TDS 578, Muff 5153, SCR 14890 I'm an asshole, and I approve this message Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #903 May 21, 2015 Don't you sell calendars??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #904 May 21, 2015 Smart asses, it was a QUESTION The suspense is killing me. If MH wins Kim might blow a gasket....but we probably wouldn't hear about.... CCS wins.....the explosion HERE would be epic..... Truthfully I can't see how they could win, it seems to be a federal issue....but you never know. Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #905 May 21, 2015 Relax, Grasshopper. Observe the peaceful grace of the butterfly. Contemplate the sound of one hand clapping. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #906 May 21, 2015 THIS from a lawyer - with a Shark picture??? Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #907 May 21, 2015 mirage62 THIS from a lawyer - with a Shark picture??? Yes. And I'm very sensitive about my body image, if you don't mind. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
nolhtairt 0 #908 May 21, 2015 mirage62 Smart asses, it was a QUESTION The suspense is killing me. If MH wins Kim might blow a gasket....but we probably wouldn't hear about.... CCS wins.....the explosion HERE would be epic..... Truthfully I can't see how they could win, it seems to be a federal issue....but you never know. Yep. I'm gonna be whooping it up. KG can just suck it up and move on as far as I'm concerned. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,384 #909 May 21, 2015 Due date for a verdict is still Friday, May 22. The 20th District Court has a page where they publish "cases of interest", but there is nothing there yet."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3mpire 0 #910 May 21, 2015 20th Judicial District / Boulder County Cases of Interest Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mirage62 0 #911 May 21, 2015 So when it is posted it will be posted here? (I mean this link)Kevin Keenan is my hero, a double FUP, he does so much with so little Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyMarko 1 #912 May 21, 2015 I have a feeling Richard Robert will update us first before that site gets updated. doh. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theonlyski 3 #913 May 21, 2015 JohnnyMarkoI have a feeling Richard will update us first before that site gets updated. Who's Richard?"I may be a dirty pirate hooker...but I'm not about to go stand on the corner." iluvtofly DPH -7, TDS 578, Muff 5153, SCR 14890 I'm an asshole, and I approve this message Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
theonlyski 3 #915 May 21, 2015 normiss Not mine. That would've been "Whose Richard?" "I may be a dirty pirate hooker...but I'm not about to go stand on the corner." iluvtofly DPH -7, TDS 578, Muff 5153, SCR 14890 I'm an asshole, and I approve this message Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #916 May 21, 2015 I went with the misplaced apostrophe. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnnyMarko 1 #917 May 21, 2015 theonlyski***I have a feeling Richard will update us first before that site gets updated. Who's Richard? Fixed it...I fucking hate when I'm multitasking and someone else's words get run through my head and spit out (co-worker was talking about someone named Richard)...I knew I should have worked from home today. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skyjumpenfool 2 #918 May 21, 2015 To the good folks at Mile High.... Tomorrow, when the judge rules in your favor. skydivers across the country will be dedicating the first beer of the evening (after the planes shut down I hope) in your honor. Here's to fighting the good fight!!! And to Kimmy.... If you'd of just had a couple beers in the first place, none of this would have been necessary. Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3mpire 0 #919 May 21, 2015 This just appeared: 13CV31563 Gibbs v. Mile Hi Skydiving Bench Trial PDF QuoteThe Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ claims for nuisance, negligence, and negligence per se. QuoteThe Court finds the noise produced by Mile-Hi’s operations is not offensive, annoying, or inconvenient to a degree significant enough that a normal person in the community would consider it unreasonable for those individuals who choose to reside in close proximity to an airport. The Plaintiffs are concerned about noise during daytime and early evening hours, which they believe impacts the use of their backyards and leisure activities. MileHi planes do not typically operate after dusk. Though the Individual Plaintiffs may at times find the noise to be irritating or frustrating, the Court finds the gravity of harm to Plaintiffs in this matter is not significant or severe. An individual may also find it irritating or frustrating to listen to the sound of motorcycles and trucks on nearby streets, to hear lawn mowers throughout the day, to hear children’s yells or laughter in a back yard, or hear the loud playing of music from a neighbor’s home. But simply because a certain noise level is irritating or frustrating to a small group of people does not equate to the noise being significant enough that a normal person in the community would find it as offensive, annoying, or inconvenient. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,384 #920 May 21, 2015 JohnnyMarko ******I have a feeling Richard will update us first before that site gets updated. Who's Richard? Fixed it...I fucking hate when I'm multitasking and someone else's words get run through my head and spit out (co-worker was talking about someone named Richard)...I knew I should have worked from home today. As soon as the media learns about it, you can expect to see it here: http://www.timescall.com/ And since the same company owns the Boulder Daily Camera, and the Denver Post, I expect it will be there simultaneously. And no doubt if CQS wins, Kimmy will be splattering it all over the CQS website, FB, and Twitter. Hell, she is so desperate for something to tweet about that she has been repeating her own tweets for the past day.If she loses...who knows. I'll just feel sorry for Mr. Lim.ETA Damn. I just heard through the grapevine about the verdict being reached at the same time I was making this post."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 24 #921 May 21, 2015 3mpireThis just appeared: 13CV31563 Gibbs v. Mile Hi Skydiving Bench Trial PDF QuoteThe Court hereby DENIES Plaintiffs’ claims for nuisance, negligence, and negligence per se. ***The Court finds the noise produced by Mile-Hi’s operations is not offensive, annoying, or inconvenient to a degree significant enough that a normal person in the community would consider it unreasonable for those individuals who choose to reside in close proximity to an airport. The Plaintiffs are concerned about noise during daytime and early evening hours, which they believe impacts the use of their backyards and leisure activities. MileHi planes do not typically operate after dusk. Though the Individual Plaintiffs may at times find the noise to be irritating or frustrating, the Court finds the gravity of harm to Plaintiffs in this matter is not significant or severe. An individual may also find it irritating or frustrating to listen to the sound of motorcycles and trucks on nearby streets, to hear lawn mowers throughout the day, to hear children’s yells or laughter in a back yard, or hear the loud playing of music from a neighbor’s home. But simply because a certain noise level is irritating or frustrating to a small group of people does not equate to the noise being significant enough that a normal person in the community would find it as offensive, annoying, or inconvenient. Awesome!Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Edjglass920 0 #922 May 21, 2015 Woooooo Hoooooo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DougH 270 #923 May 21, 2015 Plaintiffs' claims were denied. "The restraining order says you're only allowed to touch me in freefall" =P Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JWest 0 #925 May 21, 2015 QuoteThe Court finds the utility of Mile-Hi conducting a legitimate business that complies with FAA noise regulations and provides tax revenue and recreational and other service to the community outweighs the Plaintiffs’ concerns of noise, particularly when Plaintiffs moved into an area known to have an airport in close proximity and the particular noise from Mile-Hi was in the low 30 DNL level for flyovers. Basically, "You can't choose to move next to an airport then bitch about airplane noise." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites