bodypilot90 0 #1 April 27, 2012 http://dailycaller.com/2012/04/25/inhofe-to-investigate-epa-officials-crucify-them-approach-to-oil-companies/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HlTxGHn4sH4 He has a plan, but it's not a good one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnRich 4 #2 April 27, 2012 Let's see, Obama wants to crucify the oil companies, and bankrupt the coal companies. Where would that leave us, energy-wise? Steam engines, anyone? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
bodypilot90 0 #3 April 27, 2012 Remember the libs always saying high prices was Bush's fault. Now we know who is at fault, BHO is happy it is high so his green criminals can steal from the tax payers. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,145 #4 April 27, 2012 QuoteLet's see, Obama wants to crucify the oil companies, and bankrupt the coal companies. Yes, and he kills kittens too. Damn kenyan muslim. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 291 #5 April 27, 2012 QuoteLet's see, Obama wants to crucify the oil companies, and bankrupt the coal companies. Where would that leave us, energy-wise? Steam engines, anyone? With a lot of Oklahomans and Texans thinking that the oil companies are Jesus. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #6 April 27, 2012 QuoteQuoteLet's see, Obama wants to crucify the oil companies, and bankrupt the coal companies. Where would that leave us, energy-wise? Steam engines, anyone? With a lot of Oklahomans and Texans thinking that the oil companies are Jesus. And a lot of Californians wondering why the lights went out.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,434 #7 April 27, 2012 >Where would that leave us, energy-wise? With more oil than before. US oil production is up 15% under Obama. >Steam engines, anyone? Would work pretty well. Just hook em up to right wingers ears, then point out that oil production is up. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #8 April 27, 2012 Quote>Where would that leave us, energy-wise? With more oil than before. US oil production is up 15% under Obama. Sincerely doubt that's due to any policies that Obama has implemented - got any cites to show that? Quote>Steam engines, anyone? Would work pretty well. Just hook em up to right wingers ears, then point out that oil production is up. Even better, hook 'em up to the Obama Defense team.Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billeisele 122 #9 April 28, 2012 the DOE goal is to drive up the cost of energy by regulating anything and everything, taxing what they can, not allowing exploration of native reserves and allowing EPA free rein to go crazy CA bought into this foolishness and look what happened, many industries left the state and green stuff is everywhere eventually the green stuff will be cost competitive everywhere in SC they are talking about offering a 35% tax incentive for solar, is that stupid or WHAT, tax everyone so that the state can artifically support an industry and technology that is not cost effective, the solar availability here is really lowGive one city to the thugs so they can all live together. I vote for Chicago where they have strict gun laws. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreece 190 #10 April 28, 2012 QuoteObama's oil plan Jheri curl? http://s1.hubimg.com/u/576964_f260.jpgYour secrets are the true reflection of who you really are... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 388 #11 April 28, 2012 Quote>Where would that leave us, energy-wise? >With more oil than before. US oil production is up 15% under Obama. Only on private and state lands. Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14%. And by the way how can oil production be up? Aren’t we running out of oil? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Arvoitus 1 #12 May 3, 2012 QuoteQuote>Where would that leave us, energy-wise? >With more oil than before. US oil production is up 15% under Obama. Only on private and state lands. Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14%. And by the way how can oil production be up? Aren’t we running out of oil? Yes, oil is running out. Why is the production up? Year-over-year fluctuations that are being used for political purposes. US peak was Nov, 1970 at 10,044 Mbbl/d, lowest production since was, Sep, 2008 at 3,930 Mbbl/d, highest production since that low point, Feb, 2012 6,144 Mbbl/d. [source : EIA]Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #13 May 3, 2012 >Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #14 May 4, 2012 Quote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #15 May 4, 2012 >oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lummy 4 #16 May 4, 2012 Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than van be used? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/02/bloomberg_articlesM3ECOF0UQVI901-M3ETD.DTL In fact, tankers are returning back to origination with surplus oil because refineries can't hold anymore [/urlhttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL] http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL[/url]I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #17 May 4, 2012 Quote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 18 #18 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Because the radical enviors will stop donating to the Obama campain That is why he stopped the pipe line too"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #19 May 4, 2012 >why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #20 May 4, 2012 >Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than >van be used? Yep. Another part of that is the ethanol requirement. Since many places require ethanol in gasoline (up to 10% in some places) the total demand for oil is growing more slowly than it otherwise would. In 2010, for example, we produced 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol and we used 134 billion gallons of gasoline. That means a barrel of oil is able to make more gasoline than it could before, and that helps with demand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Arvoitus 1 #21 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Political will means jack shit if you have nothing in the ground to pump out of it. Look, I drew you a graph. Doesn't matter who is in charge, its a permanent decline that people will have to get used to.Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lummy 4 #22 May 4, 2012 The article was also stating that we are conserving a lot more, are getting better returns from fracking, and have been changing our reliance on gasoline for the better. In fact, a lot of the suplus oil is now being shipped overseas.I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites brenthutch 388 #23 May 5, 2012 Quote>why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. What about these guys? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/us-usa-campaign-green-idUSBRE83C08D20120413 "Built on public land, the facility is the largest of its kind in the United States. Its 1 million solar panels provide enough energy to power 17,000 homes. And it employs just 10 people." Shouldnt they have to buy the land as well? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0 Go To Topic Listing
Arvoitus 1 #12 May 3, 2012 QuoteQuote>Where would that leave us, energy-wise? >With more oil than before. US oil production is up 15% under Obama. Only on private and state lands. Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14%. And by the way how can oil production be up? Aren’t we running out of oil? Yes, oil is running out. Why is the production up? Year-over-year fluctuations that are being used for political purposes. US peak was Nov, 1970 at 10,044 Mbbl/d, lowest production since was, Sep, 2008 at 3,930 Mbbl/d, highest production since that low point, Feb, 2012 6,144 Mbbl/d. [source : EIA]Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #13 May 3, 2012 >Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #14 May 4, 2012 Quote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #15 May 4, 2012 >oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lummy 4 #16 May 4, 2012 Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than van be used? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/02/bloomberg_articlesM3ECOF0UQVI901-M3ETD.DTL In fact, tankers are returning back to origination with surplus oil because refineries can't hold anymore [/urlhttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL] http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL[/url]I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites marks2065 0 #17 May 4, 2012 Quote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rushmc 18 #18 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Because the radical enviors will stop donating to the Obama campain That is why he stopped the pipe line too"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #19 May 4, 2012 >why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,434 #20 May 4, 2012 >Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than >van be used? Yep. Another part of that is the ethanol requirement. Since many places require ethanol in gasoline (up to 10% in some places) the total demand for oil is growing more slowly than it otherwise would. In 2010, for example, we produced 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol and we used 134 billion gallons of gasoline. That means a barrel of oil is able to make more gasoline than it could before, and that helps with demand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Arvoitus 1 #21 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Political will means jack shit if you have nothing in the ground to pump out of it. Look, I drew you a graph. Doesn't matter who is in charge, its a permanent decline that people will have to get used to.Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites lummy 4 #22 May 4, 2012 The article was also stating that we are conserving a lot more, are getting better returns from fracking, and have been changing our reliance on gasoline for the better. In fact, a lot of the suplus oil is now being shipped overseas.I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites brenthutch 388 #23 May 5, 2012 Quote>why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. What about these guys? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/us-usa-campaign-green-idUSBRE83C08D20120413 "Built on public land, the facility is the largest of its kind in the United States. Its 1 million solar panels provide enough energy to power 17,000 homes. And it employs just 10 people." Shouldnt they have to buy the land as well? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
billvon 2,434 #13 May 3, 2012 >Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #14 May 4, 2012 Quote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,434 #15 May 4, 2012 >oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lummy 4 #16 May 4, 2012 Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than van be used? http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2012/05/02/bloomberg_articlesM3ECOF0UQVI901-M3ETD.DTL In fact, tankers are returning back to origination with surplus oil because refineries can't hold anymore [/urlhttp://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL] http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2012/04/23/MN261O78QA.DTL[/url]I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
marks2065 0 #17 May 4, 2012 Quote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #18 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil >companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in >those areas. Good! Have the companies buy the land they want to use. We have enough government giveaways to the political contributor of the week. why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? instead of drilling where there is the least oil? Because the radical enviors will stop donating to the Obama campain That is why he stopped the pipe line too"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,434 #19 May 4, 2012 >why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,434 #20 May 4, 2012 >Aren't oil prices finally falling because we (US) has more in storage than >van be used? Yep. Another part of that is the ethanol requirement. Since many places require ethanol in gasoline (up to 10% in some places) the total demand for oil is growing more slowly than it otherwise would. In 2010, for example, we produced 13.2 billion gallons of ethanol and we used 134 billion gallons of gasoline. That means a barrel of oil is able to make more gasoline than it could before, and that helps with demand. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Arvoitus 1 #21 May 4, 2012 QuoteQuote>Only on private and state lands. Right. Which is most of the producing oil fields in the US. >Any oil production that Obama has any control of is DOWN 14% Which oil companies does Obama "have control of?" Ok lets be specific just for you. oil production on federally controlled lands is down 14% because oil companies can not get permits from this administration to drill for oil in those areas. Political will means jack shit if you have nothing in the ground to pump out of it. Look, I drew you a graph. Doesn't matter who is in charge, its a permanent decline that people will have to get used to.Your rights end where my feelings begin. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lummy 4 #22 May 4, 2012 The article was also stating that we are conserving a lot more, are getting better returns from fracking, and have been changing our reliance on gasoline for the better. In fact, a lot of the suplus oil is now being shipped overseas.I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. I promise not to TP Davis under canopy.. eat sushi, get smoochieTTK#1 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 388 #23 May 5, 2012 Quote>why not just let them drill where there is the most oil? I'm all for that! Let oil companies bid on the land then sell it to the highest bidder. What about these guys? http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/04/13/us-usa-campaign-green-idUSBRE83C08D20120413 "Built on public land, the facility is the largest of its kind in the United States. Its 1 million solar panels provide enough energy to power 17,000 homes. And it employs just 10 people." Shouldnt they have to buy the land as well? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
