Coreece

Members
  • Content

    9,580
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    6
  • Feedback

    0%

Coreece last won the day on December 12 2021

Coreece had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

189 Good

Gear

Jump Profile

  • Home DZ
    N/A
  • Number of Jumps
    1
  • Years in Sport
    7
  • Freefall Photographer
    No

Ratings and Rigging

  • USPA Coach
    No
  • Pro Rating
    No
  • Wingsuit Instructor
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. What I saw was someone talking about "taking care of their own backyard first." That is typically followed by how they're actually doing that. For example, a truck driver might say they're buying an electric semi, but in the past Gowlerk said that would make his job too difficult. And while that is a perfectly reasonable excuse, at least he'd still have a job. Others won't be so lucky and might find themselves out of work, with their own tax dollars subsidizing the competition. So anyway, since Ken The Dinosaur Trucker can't list any examples of his own, he focuses on Brent "The Dinosaur Dad." Don't look at me. At 22 I left a $121k/yr job (adjusted for inflation) for my son's mother. She said she was lonely and afraid when I was gone, but she was also advanced in age (30 years) so we decided I'd become a pioneer as a stay at home dad so she can focus on her career. (and we'd be together everyday) It was the greatest experience of my life and I appreciated every moment of it. (except that one time when she was upset that I didn't have dinner ready, lmao) Just doing my part to narrow the gender wage gap, I guess. Beats bitching about some imaginary misogynistic patriarchy holding women down. A while later, I landed my dream job traveling as a photographer/editor, primarily for the Outdoor channel. As time went by she wanted to move to California to start her own business. I was happy where I was at, but was up for the adventure. Again, just doing my part to narrow the wage gap, I guess. But I suppose I would've had to draw the line somewhere. If my 5yr old son had said he wanted to be a pirate, I doubt I would pluck his eye out, give him a patch and dress him in a silly outfit with a sword. Not that any of that would actually make him a pirate of course. He'd still be just a little boy, but without an eye and dressed in a silly outfit - all because I "respected his independence" so much that I let some shill convince me to abuse him in this way so as not to kill himself.
  2. Absolutely, 100% yes it was. Honestly right, when you said this “oh wait, making a sex tape with an underage minor is perfectly legal?“ did you seriously think people would understand that you actually meant any of what you said above? well if you're asking me to be honest. You'll see that I actually went to edit it because I agree it's a bit confusing, but opted to leave it in and see what happens. I also added a question mark. ; ) I figured someone might rush in to tell me how wrong I was, to which I might reply - "well he wasn't charged for making the sex tape, so how do you know?" And then perhaps we could have a discussion on it, who knows. I also thought it was possible that some might get distracted by the plan parenthood comment and not even notice - which is why I made that comment to Joe. Anyway, my bad. No, much easier to just spit it out. Thanks.
  3. But you're laughing at the damage. I need to emphasise: you're laughing at the damage. You're not laughing at just the progressives any more. You delight in the damage. You've got serious problems, man. You'd have a point it he started a thread with a giant photo of a pile of trash without any other context, and said "BWHAHAHAHAHA!" He already told you who he's "laughing" at and why, and it's not the damage, you know he's not and everyone else knows he's not, so stop acting like a typical gen z tik-toker and get over it.
  4. Says to take care of your own backyard first, then immediately proceeds to tell Brent how his family can take care of their own backyard, first. Typical liberal.
  5. Then what in the actual fuck was your point? There were several links posted to headlines about criminal charges and a sex tape. A couple posters emphasized that the sex tape involved an underage female minor. One of the stories acknowledges that the sex tape has nothing to do with the criminal charges. The other story doesn't seem to make an effort to clarify that fact. It's still unclear to me that if sex between an 18 and 16 year old is consensual and legal, would the sex tape legal also be legal? I was also taken back by the fact that in Colorado, a 24 year old man can have sex with a 15 year old girl. And as an aside, it kind of blew my mind that he can sexually ravage her, but it wouldn't be considered contributing to her delinquency unless of course he was trying to be romantic and offered a sip of wine. Was that really so hard to parse?
  6. Well he at least acknowledged that my points were valid, so perhaps you're just ill informed and can connect the dots. In the future, feel free to ask for help. And if someone rather ask irrelevant questions about my personal sexuality rather than discuss the valid points with which they actually agree, then I don't see the point in posting at all, which apparently is a common theme with Weber.
  7. Nope Yes, that's precisely what happened. You said I made some valid points, but rather than discussing those like a coherent adult, you start rambling off irrelevant question about murdering an unfertilized chicken egg and when I first jerked-off to playboy. So again, what points did you find valid? Just curious, Did it even cross your mind that perhaps making a sex tape with a minor might actually be illegal even if the sex is legally consentual, or were you too triggered by the planned parenthood comment to notice? (which btw had nothing to do with abortion.) Like what? And what does that have to do with my post and the points you found valid? You asked me when I first jerked-off, fingered a girl and got gobsmacked when asking for anal, which are rather personal questions. And then start bashing my faith for no reason because of some imaginary, irrelevant beliefs inside your "brain" that you can't even be bothered to list.
  8. But it hasn't worked, has it? Like I said, take a hint. You formulate irrelevant questions that suit your intention of making it personal so you can avoid addressing the valid points - this time is no different.
  9. You make some valid points. So I can better understand your angst I have a few questions. When did you first masturbate with or without a Playboy ? How old were you? Have you ever fingered a girl you weren’t married to? How old were you? Have you ever been gobsmacked by a sex partner asking for anal sex? How old were you? Do you believe that cracking a chicken egg into a hot pan is murdering a chicken? You're not as clever as you think you are. You'll need to be a bit more charming. How about starting with those valid points. . .can't you take a hint?
  10. OMG, he made a SEX TAPE with a FEMALE UNDERAGE MINOR! What a sick piece of shit pedophile son of a bitch republican! That planned parenthood sex-ed video in school only talked about fingering, anal sex and how virginity doesn't exist. . .nothing about a SEX TAPE WITH AN UNDERAGE MINOR!!!!!!!!!!!!! . . .oh wait, making a sex tape with an underage minor is perfectly legal? Even a 24 year old man can make a sex tape with a 15 year old girl in Colorado and it's perfectly fine? Ok BUT, if he gives her a sip of his wine in the sex tape, THAT'S CROSSING THE LINE!!!!!! CHILD DELINQUENCY!
  11. So have most of the more thoughtful ones. Which is a shame; hearing how normal and thoughtful people think is valuable, and informs me. But no one likes being dogpiled forever And so have many of the more thoughtful "left wingers," which I think might say more about this place than "rabid right wingers running away." Still don't really know who he means by that. Maybe from his perspective he's talking about Slim, but let's face it, he was more likely to be banned than run away. Or maybe his rumble and youtube channels finally got monetized, where the bigger the dogpile, the more exposure. Plus you have an army of a minimum 1000 subscribers doing the dirty work of defending your content for you. So this way, when one posts decent conservative content, and the only response from liberals is some irrelevant garble about how they "pray to torture devices, get boners over genocide in the middle east and anxiously await for societal collapse so they can shoot brown people," they actually get paid for it. Thus, to habitually reply to such nonsense in places like this would be pathological.
  12. Well, if those were all one-night stands and you're saying that you only had sex 36 times in your life, then they might cut you some slack.
  13. Neither did the recent Kansas City gun control laws specifically targeting juvenile gun violence, now we have two juveniles in custody and 11 children shot. In other news, a Church security team stopped a bad gal with a gun at Lakewood Church in Texas. Meanwhile, Democrats of course want to pass a law that would supposedly ban such security teams.
  14. lmao, like who? There are only a handful of stragglers left here and they don't seem particularly angry. Perhaps you're just confusing them with those in your favorite comment section again. . .Tik Tok? For awhile it seemed like a favorite American pastime to make fun of presidential gaffes over the years, but with Biden it's just not the same. I don't find it at all funny anymore, and it's becoming exceedingly uncomfortable to watch. About a month ago I've started noticing certain mannerisms and facial expressions that were remarkably similar to those of my wife due to the long term effects of radiotherapy on the brain that tend to mimic white matter disease. Apparently there are now new treatments to mitigate these effects, but not sure if they're intended for those experiencing this through natural aging.
  15. Please elaborate I miss the tongue in cheek emoji on the old format. I'm just saying that everyone ends up equally miserable even if someone is less miserable at the expense of another's happiness. I don't remember ever discussing it here - and I'm certainly no expert, but if we can all agree that equity of opportunity is more desirable than equity of outcome, then that's a good start I guess.