Marinus 0
Recommended Posts
mnealtx 0
Quote2775> Jones:
I too don’t see why the schemes should be symmetrical. The temperature ones certainly will not as we’re choosing the periods to show warming
Quote0953> Jones:
This will reduce the 1940-1970 cooling in NH temps. Explaining the cooling with sulphates won’t be quite as necessary
Hide the decline....
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
You seem to be a pretty tuned in guy. I don't believe in the "Day after tomorrow" shit. I do believe that we have no solid ability to predict the outcome of our use of natural resources. The one thing I can say with certainty is we can and do affect our environment on both the microscopic and macroscopic level. A bit of foresight and what if's, is in my estimation, far better than pushing thru with an" it'll be fine" attitude. The fact is when the Saudi oil fields are bled dry. We have no idea what happens to the space it occupied or the consequences of changing the state of that matter. I agree there is no need to scream fire in the theater, but a bit of ciphering could go a along way in mitigating the consequences.
rushmc 18
QuoteSince you forgot to read what I wrote: let's quote myself shall we:
QuoteYeah we got decades, maybe even centuries left, that's a long time for some people. Others look at the big picture, and realize that 200 years is next to nothing.
So no I don't think oil will run out next week.
And then on to this:QuoteBTW
Let me ask you a question
Who were you on this site before you became Marinus?
You don't have proof for me having multiple accounts, and you won't provide proof, because I don't have or ever had, another account on this site.It might be the case that someone else has exactly the same writing style as I have, but it's far, far more likely that you try to undermine my credibility by telling lies about me. I don't take kindly to that, btw.
So if you suspect that I've another account, you can entertain me (and everyone else that might be interested) by providing a link to said account. If you can't provide a link, it's safe to assume that you're a pathetic liar.
I don't want to derail this thread, but since you openly made this accusation, I really like to openly see you fail to back up this accusation and (if you've got a spine) say sorry for accusing me. I would give you your own call out thread but it seems that that's frowned upon.
I have apologized here before and I will most likely do it again
And you are correct as you style has a resemblance that caught my eye
But, if you say you never have had a duplicate account here I will take your word for that
and please accept my apology here
Now, since we agree we will not run out of oil anytime soon, let us continue.
This being the case then we need to let the technologies do their thing
Artificially running up energy prices today and subsidizing poor alternatives serves only
to empower those in the chosen trades and government officials.
The solution will be found
Government intervention will only slow it down
There are expamples I know when the gov did not slow things down
But todays gov is just bent on power and money
Hence, some of them support the alarmist POV
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
It's
funny
that
you
double
space.
Most children do.
funny
that
you
double
space.
Most children do.
brenthutch 388
OK folks, let get back to the topic at hand. What do you think about the veracity of the science and the scientists pushing their "cause"? I did not know that crusading for a cause was part of science. I know that some will not be able to get their brains around this one, but I would hope that most of you will.
Discuss.
Discuss.
rushmc 18
QuoteIt's
funny
that
you
double
space.
Most children do.
Sorry
It
bothers
You
this
better?
WAFJ
![[:/]](/uploads/emoticons/dry.png "[:/]"){kind=small}
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
You're argument is equivalent to...I have a total; do i cut away or just dump my reserve. A whoffo will rightfully say these guys have no idea what they are doing. The people that know look at your skepticism the same way.
No , just proves a point.
rushmc 18
QuoteNo , just proves a point.
From a petty positon?
Why yes
It really does
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
rushmc 18
QuoteIt's
funny
that
you
double
space.
Most children do.
Going to make the same lame comment to nigel99 i
in the thread he started too?
Or is this just a childest attack on a person with
whom you do not agree with politically?
Never mind
I know the answers
BTW
You do understand that this style is taught for a reason?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
brenthutch 388
QuoteYou're argument is equivalent to...I have a total; do i cut away or just dump my reserve. A whoffo will rightfully say these guys have no idea what they are doing. The people that know look at your skepticism the same way.
What is the argument that you claim I am making?
Just did.
mnealtx 0
Another goodie:
Gotta love 'scientists' that ignore the scientific method.
QuoteHaimberger:
It is interesting to see the lower tropospheric warming minimum in the tropics in all three plots, which I cannot explain. I believe it is spurious but it is remarkably robust against my adjustment efforts.”
Gotta love 'scientists' that ignore the scientific method.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
Coreece 190
QuoteSam Kinneson pointed out the futility of "aid" to famine struck areas, and the principle of people without food expecting things to somehow spontaneously improve if they can only have enough children is a losing bet.
Sounds like a new fallacy...ad comoedus ridiculum.
But ya, it was a funny comedic routine, one of my favorites despite it's lack of factual integrity, as is with most stand up. I was always amazed at how many people actually consider comedians reliable sources of information and appeal to them when making a "legitimate" argument.
Your secrets are the true reflection of who you really are...
That you are a whoffo, looking from the outside and claiming we are full of shit when we say skydiving is safe. Neither of us know the consequences of these actions but as sure as we type they exist. As i type this I think it far more prudent to ask"what if" before we have to ask "why".
rushmc 18
QuoteJust did.
So now we really know who is being childish now
Dont we
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Only teens, or people whom cannot effectively communicate use emoteicons.
rushmc 18
QuoteOnly teens, or people whom cannot effectively communicate use emoteicons.
You are going to be fun to deal with as the upcoming Obama loss gets closer along with alarmist loosing ground daily
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Sorry, I used
grammar and punctuation.
Hope this helps.
Only teens,
or people
whom cannot
effectively communicate use emoteicons.
grammar and punctuation.
Hope this helps.
Only teens,
or people
whom cannot
effectively communicate use emoteicons.
dks13827 3
We are not running out of oil.
So no I don't think oil will run out next week.
And then on to this:
You don't have proof for me having multiple accounts, and you won't provide proof, because I don't have or ever had, another account on this site.It might be the case that someone else has exactly the same writing style as I have, but it's far, far more likely that you try to undermine my credibility by telling lies about me. I don't take kindly to that, btw.
So if you suspect that I've another account, you can entertain me (and everyone else that might be interested) by providing a link to said account. If you can't provide a link, it's safe to assume that you're a pathetic liar.
I don't want to derail this thread, but since you openly made this accusation, I really like to openly see you fail to back up this accusation and (if you've got a spine) say sorry for accusing me. I would give you your own call out thread but it seems that that's frowned upon.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites