Andy9o8 0 #1 October 17, 2009 http://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airdvr 197 #2 October 17, 2009 Wow! Country music too? Unheard of...Please don't dent the planet. Destinations by Roxanne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #3 October 17, 2009 EXCELLENT! Nothing like a book burning to usher in Todos Santos. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,623 #4 October 17, 2009 QuoteEXCELLENT! Nothing like a book burning to usher in Todos Santos. Maybe they could roast a few witches over the flames.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
christelsabine 1 #5 October 17, 2009 "It is not clear whether the meat will be grilled over the heat of burning Gospels." That's the part I enjoyed the most - bwahahaha ....... Seriously: They at first should contact a specialist for those questions, such as f. e. Bill Cole, before even starting a fire, seriously... man. dudeist skydiver # 3105 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #6 October 17, 2009 QuoteQuoteEXCELLENT! Nothing like a book burning to usher in Todos Santos. Maybe they could roast a few witches over the flames. And they ignite, they weren't really witches, if they don't, they truely are witches. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lucky... 0 #7 October 17, 2009 Quotehttp://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Maybe they can burn Bible too, it advocates antimiscegenation.....oh wait, the religious right does too, obviously by recent events. Nevermind Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #8 October 17, 2009 Idiots ... like all Fundamentalists (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,255 #9 October 17, 2009 ***of his 14-member parish.Quote Uh, exactly how many of Satan's works are they going to find in the possession of 14 mental Baptists? Unless they actually go and buy some specially for the fire (thus financially rewarding the evil publishers and boksellers) it sounds like it'll be a pretty uninspiring event...Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites millertimeunc 0 #10 October 17, 2009 That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. The best things in life are dangerous. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skybill 19 #11 October 17, 2009 Quotehttp://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Hi 9o8, Interesting, The "King James version" as "Gods' preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word!!" Hmmmmm???? Do battle with the Pope as,"His word is suppose to be 'Infallible??'" And I always thought of the King James version as,"Revisionist!!"SCR-2034, SCS-680 III%, Deli-out Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,400 #12 October 18, 2009 But what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kallend 1,623 #13 October 18, 2009 QuoteBut what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Are you, by any chance, expecting logic from religious fundamentalists? My cat is more likely to write a Hollywood screenplay.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #14 October 18, 2009 Quotehttp://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Fanatics of every religion piss me off.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Skyrad 0 #15 October 20, 2009 They should get in touch with these guys http://www.nsm88.org/rally/book_burning.html After all theres no real difference between them and they can cut costs on fuel at the same time.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites imnotlost 0 #16 October 20, 2009 I bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites 4000m 0 #17 October 20, 2009 Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood?Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/4000meter Youtube Favorites: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjnVsp4Epra-PRDETgrF3M04B3X86X1eh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites TomAiello 25 #18 October 20, 2009 QuoteI bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. I bet they've all got tin foil hats, too.-- Tom Aiello [email protected] SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Southern_Man 0 #19 October 20, 2009 Quote Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood? Build a bridge out of her!"What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites 4000m 0 #20 October 20, 2009 Quote Quote Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood? Build a bridge out of her! Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/4000meter Youtube Favorites: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjnVsp4Epra-PRDETgrF3M04B3X86X1eh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Belgian_Draft 0 #21 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteBut what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Are you, by any chance, expecting logic from religious fundamentalists? My cat is more likely to write a Hollywood screenplay. Cats are much too easily distracted to write a screenplay. "It was a dark and stormy night..." Oh look....a MOUSE!! YUM!HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 0 #22 October 20, 2009 Quote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #23 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteI bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. I bet they've all got tin foil hats, too. speaking of fundamentalist fanatics, I was amused by the irony of imnotlost's post as well ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites rehmwa 2 #24 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. well, it did look like a lot of fun as a thread gambit in the 2000-2008 years, so why not? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 0 #25 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. well, it did look like a lot of fun as a thread gambit in the 2000-2008 years, so why not? So in other words ..... you advocate the strangling of kittens. I shall now compose an argument against that. Since it's the position you so obviously advocate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Prev 1 2 Next Page 1 of 2 Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
millertimeunc 0 #10 October 17, 2009 That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. The best things in life are dangerous. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skybill 19 #11 October 17, 2009 Quotehttp://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Hi 9o8, Interesting, The "King James version" as "Gods' preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word!!" Hmmmmm???? Do battle with the Pope as,"His word is suppose to be 'Infallible??'" And I always thought of the King James version as,"Revisionist!!"SCR-2034, SCS-680 III%, Deli-out Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #12 October 18, 2009 But what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,623 #13 October 18, 2009 QuoteBut what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Are you, by any chance, expecting logic from religious fundamentalists? My cat is more likely to write a Hollywood screenplay.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #14 October 18, 2009 Quotehttp://rawstory.com/2009/10/n-c-church-to-burn-satans-books-including-works-of-mother-theresa/ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/6346662/North-Carolina-church-plans-Halloween-Bible-burning.html http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&newwindow=1&as_q=baptist+church+book&as_epq=&as_oq=burn+burning&as_eq=&num=100&lr=&as_filetype=&ft=i&as_sitesearch=&as_qdr=w&as_rights=&as_occt=any&cr=&as_nlo=&as_nhi=&safe=off QuoteNorth Carolina church to burn ‘Satan’s books,’ including works of Mother Teresa A Baptist Church near Asheville, N.C., is hosting a "Halloween book burning" to purge the area of "Satan's" works, which include all non-King James versions of the Bible, popular books by many religious authors and even country music. "I believe the King James version is God's preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God," Pastor Marc Grizzard told a local news station of his 14-member parish. Fanatics of every religion piss me off.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #15 October 20, 2009 They should get in touch with these guys http://www.nsm88.org/rally/book_burning.html After all theres no real difference between them and they can cut costs on fuel at the same time.When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
imnotlost 0 #16 October 20, 2009 I bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4000m 0 #17 October 20, 2009 Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood?Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/4000meter Youtube Favorites: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjnVsp4Epra-PRDETgrF3M04B3X86X1eh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
TomAiello 25 #18 October 20, 2009 QuoteI bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. I bet they've all got tin foil hats, too.-- Tom Aiello [email protected] SnakeRiverBASE.com Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Southern_Man 0 #19 October 20, 2009 Quote Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood? Build a bridge out of her!"What if there were no hypothetical questions?" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4000m 0 #20 October 20, 2009 Quote Quote Quote That's incorrect. Witches burn because they're made of wood. Exactly. So how do we tell if she's made of wood? Build a bridge out of her! Ah, but can you not also make bridges out of stone?Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/4000meter Youtube Favorites: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjnVsp4Epra-PRDETgrF3M04B3X86X1eh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Belgian_Draft 0 #21 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteBut what about the New King James version of the Bible? Must that be burned as well? Or does it get a pass because it's _almost_ the preserved, inspired, inerrant and infallible word of God? And how about the Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek originals? If King James was the only infallible version (and since it often does not agree with the source material it was translated from) surely the originals should be burned. Are you, by any chance, expecting logic from religious fundamentalists? My cat is more likely to write a Hollywood screenplay. Cats are much too easily distracted to write a screenplay. "It was a dark and stormy night..." Oh look....a MOUSE!! YUM!HAMMER: Originally employed as a weapon of war, the hammer nowadays is used as a kind of divining rod to locate the most expensive parts adjacent the object we are trying to hit. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #22 October 20, 2009 Quote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #23 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteI bet these are the same type of people judging and portraying the current administration as Hitler... Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. I bet they've all got tin foil hats, too. speaking of fundamentalist fanatics, I was amused by the irony of imnotlost's post as well ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rehmwa 2 #24 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. well, it did look like a lot of fun as a thread gambit in the 2000-2008 years, so why not? ... Driving is a one dimensional activity - a monkey can do it - being proud of your driving abilities is like being proud of being able to put on pants Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #25 October 20, 2009 QuoteQuoteQuote Yep. Anyone who disagrees with the current administration must be a book burning fundamentalist. Of course not; you're twisting that poster's words so that you can argue against the "twisted" version. Nice try. But in any event, you'd have a hard time persuading me that 9 out of 10 book burning fundamentalists are not also among the most strident opponents (in extremity of word and deed) of the current administration. well, it did look like a lot of fun as a thread gambit in the 2000-2008 years, so why not? So in other words ..... you advocate the strangling of kittens. I shall now compose an argument against that. Since it's the position you so obviously advocate. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
