tbrown 26 #1 April 11, 2007 Don't know if this one's been posted at Monster.com yet, but the White House is looking for a "high powered" official to coordinate the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Sounds like a "motivated self starter" would help, and "thinking outside the box" might help even more, unless you have something to say that displeases The Great Decider (TGD). Guess TGD hasn't heard yet, the voters still want out. In other news, Defense Sec'y Gates has announced the standard tour of duty will be extended to 15 months. I really do have an immense amount of respect for those of you on these forums who have served in either or both of these wars. I know some of you have come back missing an arm or a leg too. One of my daughter's friends was killed over there two months ago. I know you've given it everything you've got. I just think The Great Decider has done all of you - and all of us as a nation a great disservice, at least with the Iraqi war (and yes, I do think Afghanistan is a "good war"). There will be no good options; not if we stay, and not if we leave. Eventually we will leave, if history offers any examples. But not until TGD is safely enjoying his pension back at the ranch in Texas. He's already said so himself. Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #2 April 11, 2007 Yeah and so far I have heard at least 4 retired generals have declined this immence honor to serve at the will of the president. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #3 April 11, 2007 QuoteYeah and so far I have heard at least 4 retired generals have declined this immence honor to serve at the will of the president. Well Jeanne, would YOU want that job ? I mean aside from your undeniable ability to open a can of whupass, why would anyone want it ? I just hope he's not trying to set something up for Jeb or Cheney. Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #4 April 11, 2007 QuoteDon't know if this one's been posted at Monster.com yet, but the White House is looking for a "high powered" official to coordinate the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that kinda the job of somebody in government ALREADY? What would his name be? The Secretary of Defense or something?quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #5 April 11, 2007 I want to be White House Lemur Keeper.Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Stumpy 256 #6 April 11, 2007 What is it with you and small furry animals? I am a bit worried Never try to eat more than you can lift Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #7 April 11, 2007 Quote Quote Don't know if this one's been posted at Monster.com yet, but the White House is looking for a "high powered" official to coordinate the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that kinda the job of somebody in government ALREADY? What would his name be? The Secretary of Defense or something? The Secretary of Defense is responsible for coordinating the military's defense of the USA. This new office would be a War Czar. Sort of a Secretary of Offense. It's necessary for the Neo-Con plan for dominating the world militarily. And guess who gets to pay for this Lex Luthor fantasy. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #8 April 11, 2007 Dave, you only need to be worried if you a little furry animal (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #9 April 11, 2007 I'm having a mid-life crisis, and am aching for a sea-change in my career. Any idea what the job pays? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #10 April 11, 2007 >This new office would be a War Czar. Sort of a Secretary of Offense. I'd think this would end up being a thankless, meaningless position. Someone will get it, do a careful analysis of what needs to be done to ensure the best outcome in Iraq - and then Bush will do whatever he damn well pleases. (Unless, of course, he has started to give up on being The Decider.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narcimund 0 #11 April 11, 2007 QuoteI'd think this would end up being a thankless, meaningless position. Yes, but at least there's perpetual war to provide job security. First Class Citizen Twice Over Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
akarunway 1 #12 April 12, 2007 Quote Yeah and so far I have heard at least 4 retired generals have declined this immence honor to serve at the will of the president. I wonder why this one didn't want the job. > "Sheehan, a 35-year Marine, served on the Defense Policy Board advising the Pentagon early in the Bush administration and at one point was reportedly considered by then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs. He now works as an executive at Bechtel Corp. developing oil projects in the Middle East."I hold it true, whate'er befall; I feel it, when I sorrow most; 'Tis better to have loved and lost Than never to have loved at all. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #13 April 12, 2007 Quote He now works as an executive at Bechtel Corp. developing oil projects in the Middle East." Gee that would be a major pay cut.. and a HUGE CLM going to work in THIS administration...All that quacking of the lame ducks around the White House must be unnerving. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skyrad 0 #14 April 12, 2007 I'll give it a bash. When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy. Lucius Annaeus Seneca Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gkc1436 3 #15 April 12, 2007 >Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that kinda the job of somebody in government ALREADY? What would his name be? The Secretary of Defense or something? actually, Comander in Chief i think we have one of those, dont we? g Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #16 April 12, 2007 Quote Quote Yeah and so far I have heard at least 4 retired generals have declined this immence honor to serve at the will of the president. I wonder why this one didn't want the job. > "Sheehan, a 35-year Marine, served on the Defense Policy Board advising the Pentagon early in the Bush administration and at one point was reportedly considered by then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld to be chairman of the Joint Chiefs. He now works as an executive at Bechtel Corp. developing oil projects in the Middle East." Ohh....I dunno.... I mean the fat exec paycheck with an umbilical to the US treasury along with a world addicted to your product, or scapegoat co-pilot for the Hindenburg? Decisions, decisions. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
tbrown 26 #17 May 7, 2007 According to Yahoo!, the post is still open. So anyone out there looking for a fat govt job with benefits and perks should dust off their resumes. Though so far I haven't found a listing at monster.com - but you never know ! Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #18 May 7, 2007 He might need a new SecDef pretty soon too. Gates is suggesting that setting deadlines is a good thing. And we know what happens to people who disagree with Bush in his administration. From LA Times: -------------- n fact, Gates' recent comments seem to run counter to the message from the White House. During a recent trip to the Middle East, Gates told the Iraqi government that time was running out and praised Democratic efforts in the U.S. Congress to set a timetable for withdrawal, saying it would help prod the Iraqis. He reiterated that point during a meeting with reporters last week. --------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ExAFO 0 #19 May 7, 2007 QuoteAccording to Yahoo!, the post is still open. So anyone out there looking for a fat govt job with benefits and perks should dust off their resumes. Though so far I haven't found a listing at monster.com - but you never know ! I have a fat housecat who's too lazy to catch mice--is she qualified?Illinois needs a CCW Law. NOW. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #20 May 7, 2007 Quote He might need a new SecDef pretty soon too. Gates is suggesting that setting deadlines is a good thing. And we know what happens to people who disagree with Bush in his administration. From LA Times: -------------- n fact, Gates' recent comments seem to run counter to the message from the White House. During a recent trip to the Middle East, Gates told the Iraqi government that time was running out and praised Democratic efforts in the U.S. Congress to set a timetable for withdrawal, saying it would help prod the Iraqis. He reiterated that point during a meeting with reporters last week. --------------- Maybe even a Sec of State too. I mean what's with Condi and this fraternizing with the enemy crap? I wonder what Cheney thinks about her antics. I'm sure that he's as steadfast on appeasing the enemy as he is on gay marriage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,384 #21 May 7, 2007 Quote I have a fat housecat who's too lazy to catch mice--is she qualified? Considering all the damage caused by the W administration doing ill-conceived things, I'm thinking a cat that does nothing would be a marked improvement."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #22 May 7, 2007 Quote Quote I have a fat housecat who's too lazy to catch mice--is she qualified? Considering all the damage caused by the W administration doing ill-conceived things, I'm thinking a cat that does nothing would be a marked improvement. Like the cat that did nothing about Somalia, Khobar Towers, the embassy attacks in Africa, etc, etc....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
idrankwhat 0 #23 May 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote I have a fat housecat who's too lazy to catch mice--is she qualified? Considering all the damage caused by the W administration doing ill-conceived things, I'm thinking a cat that does nothing would be a marked improvement. Like the cat that did nothing about Somalia, Khobar Towers, the embassy attacks in Africa, etc, etc.... You're right. We should have attacked Venezuela. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mnealtx 0 #24 May 7, 2007 Quote Quote Quote Quote I have a fat housecat who's too lazy to catch mice--is she qualified? Considering all the damage caused by the W administration doing ill-conceived things, I'm thinking a cat that does nothing would be a marked improvement. Like the cat that did nothing about Somalia, Khobar Towers, the embassy attacks in Africa, etc, etc.... You're right. We should have attacked Venezuela. That'd be like .... bombing an aspirin factory or something....Mike I love you, Shannon and Jim. POPS 9708 , SCR 14706 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #25 May 7, 2007 >That'd be like .... bombing an aspirin factory or something.... That was an WMD factory! Didn't you see the fancy intelligence proving it? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites