SkyDekker

I think the attack on Pearl Harbor was somewhat of an embarrassement to America. Obviously it wasn't funny, not sure where you got that. I think it is great that powerful countries try and look out for the less fortunate in the world. What I don't particularly agree with is all these people claiming the US went to war to help the jews and save the poor people in Europe, because eventhough it makes you all warm and tingly inside, it isn't quite the whole truth.

Bull shit, another revision of history. America didn't care about the jews until the Japanese embarrassed you in your own back yard.

Fuck, I think I'll get the biggest fuckin' flash supressor and fuck I think I might fuckin' throw in a fuckin' 15 round magazine....fuck.

I was and is a simple question, a simple yes or no would have sufficed. No need for the name calling, but you seem to be quite liberal with those

so much for to serve and protect.

I never said it would be the first option, did I now. All I asked is how many of the gun afficionados would. Read before you go on silly rants based on assumptions.

yes and yes

Actually, one of the problems with Holland and one of the reasons I left holland is that it gives incredible opportunities to people who look to come and live there. The turkish and Marrokkan communities in Holland are huge, all looking for a better or easier way to make money and provide for their families. One of the reasons why it is one of the more densely populated countries in the world.

Well, that does seem to be one of the major thoughts behind that amendmend to your constitution. Off course, you immediately have to follow it with some silly rant about gun owners and violence. Must have been tough for you to read about that new medical condition when you have to sit on the book to read it

Interesting sig line for some one who then goes on to preach about respect.

I have never seen the pro-gun advocates on this forum this quiet........

I think you watch a little too many hollywood movies.

You are right, only Haliburton can supply meals to the troops and build shitters. There is absolutely no other company in the US or the so called Coalition of the Willing that could possibly do that.

Then define control. The US physically restricts his movement, that is control to me.

well, that's easy, many americans have trouble finding Europe on a map, mind you they also have trouble finding their own state, or maybe their largest trading partner on a map. I grew up in Holland. I have heard many a person say they wanted to move to North America, but that they would never want to live in the US. Actually most of the people I know in Holland laugh at the US, they see it more as a country providing entertainment than anything else. Those are just my experiences after 25 years in Europe. How long were you in Europe for?

I am assuming you meant he is no longer under US control. Do you actually believe that?

You know what, as an outsider it would almost be worth to watch the bush government potpone the vote indefintely. Then I could see how much that constitutional right to bear arms is really worth. So, here is the second question, how many of you gun afficionados will take your guns and try and oust the rogue government you would be saddled with?

I am sure you are much more successful at what you do than Donald Trump is. Makes you wonder about the idiot comment, doesn't it?

That's why it is good to be the boss

ok, some of my playlist on my lappie: guitars on mushrooms bb king live at san quentin beastie boys - to the 5 boroughs Blue Oyster Cult coldplay parachutes downchild blues band evanescence - not for your ears Hoobastank Moby - play Pink Floyd - Meddle Run Lola Run Radiohead - The Bends Jumi Hendrick - Axis, Bold as Love

Thanks, I like to think so.

That's a bit of an oxymoron

This is what my son was up to this past July 1st. I have trained him well

Well, I guess that means you agree that Bush is stupid, but that he is still a better choice than Kerry. I guess that is a good first step

Now what if there is another giant organization who's specific job it is to find thieves, and they are telling you there is no evidence that he is a thief. That they have been specifically looking at the guy and investigating him for years. What if many of your peers are telling you this guy is not a thief. What if you only believed what you wanted to hear. what if you only gave credibility to the "facts" that fit your story. You are right, that would not make him a liar. It would just make him plain stupid, but apparently for many a great choice for president.