cvfd1399

Ooh god this place is now reddit.

Are you 12?

Don't worry norm is now safe, the "puppet" messaged me the mods blocked his user ID for this forum.

You jealous of the new guys? You don't know it but kallend, Amazon, and the others have been working you like a puppet for years, they even have you trained to follow along and post "+1", "touché", "bravo" etc. Behind their actual content. I have even recently pointed it out to you multiple times.

That's his posting MO.

No the title was about law enforcement exemptions. If you don't beleive me look up its right there. Now that you have been shown by many that different treatment is rampant you now change gears and shift the goalposts. Wanna start a new thread with a better title or admit your wrong?

You are just not getting it. That law simply does not give me anything. You seem to think that it gives me an extra protection, but it doesn't. Nothing in that law is going to stand between me and someone who wants to do me harm, no matter how much you insist. All it does is add maybe extra punishment if they catch the guy. You don't get it that's why I bring it up.... Why should the bolded underline part apply to you and not any other old citizen. What makes you different than the rest of us that requires extra punishment?

Ignore it all you want the point is people are not always treated equally, or has certain "protections" such as being able to hold fully auto weapons others usually can't, or are looked upon by the law as something that needs to be protected or have harsher punishments attached for attacking that person. Billvon has already shown you, and you ignore it then, not sure why I thought you would see it this way. I don't get free beer, or jumps either, what is your point on that line???

You want thinGS to be equal for everyone but laugh when it is shown you yourself due to your employment type get certain preferential treatment in legal matters.

Here is an example of you getting special treatment. Why should someone get a harsher punishment because you are active military, you are a human just like the rest of us. /Sarcasm

Why are you posting stuff like this?

Concept isn't valid. None of the regulations you listed made guns non-lethal or even less-lethal. Then why did the government enact the law that regulated them if those accessories do not make the rifle any more lethal?? No idea.....but that doesn't change anything. You are right everything they propose does not change anything. Obama even said it himself this time. They propose restrictions on gun owners that does nothing, and they usually admit it, so why fucking do it other than to test how far you can go with the 2nd amendment restrictions....that is the point. Why spin your wheels and limit Americans to what they can or cannot do when before the ink is dry is already worthless limits on freedom.

I am sure there are some articulable rights that can be found. What is greater is the setting of a foundation that leads to later acceptance of the actual removal of rights through propaganda, numbing of the minds by repeated attempts which end up going unnoticed or passed off as another false alarm then snuck in a 5000 page unrelated bill, or end around attempts. Example. Cant pass an outright gun type ban, well attack the ammo for that weapon, can't pass that, well attack it some other way, how about a way that through the courts might find it violates due process like California's bill, and obamas proposal.

Concept isn't valid. None of the regulations you listed made guns non-lethal or even less-lethal. Then why did the government enact the law that regulated them if those accessories do not make the rifle any more lethal??

How many of those 490 days did he host and meet with other world leaders, and take care of business as normal but remotely? He did go there but many of those days it was "work from the ranch days", not all idle days roping cows. I am sure Bush accomplished much more on his vacation days than Obama does on his. Because, Obama. Does it burn you so bad you can't even admit that it was probable that many of those days were "working days", instead you make a shitty quip about it, smh

Ok, will do thanks.

It is two different situations for sure, just a shocking number I wanted to throw out there. It seems it has not gotten any better. In Iraq and Afghanistan that number has expanded to 250,000 rounds per insurgent killed. http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/us-forced-to-import-bullets-from-israel-as-troops-use-250000-for-every-rebel-killed-28580666.html

I guess you surf the internet and watch a lot of TV. ... Florida, 2 years ago. 60 year old man in his own driveway. Fortunately, the cops shot about average for cops (like shit) and only hit him in the leg. 15 shots, two hits. There are tons of these kind of stories out there. How many shots per kill did the military get in ww2, Korea, Vietnam? I read it was somewhere around 50,000 bullets per kill....

Just wait he has another round of changes up his sleeve. Undisclosed secret one sided meetings leaving the GOP and any lobbyists out of all of it.

Back to the OP did he ever state a position yet, or did he just come in, stir the pot and run?

You are completely lost in this conversation....SMH What am I missing about military weapons training? Do they train you to overcome your post discharge mental illnesses? Do they teach you how to shoot past the limitations of your recent stroke which left half of your body at 25% capacity? Did they instruct you in the ways of sight alignment, and sight picture through debilitating cataracts? Which target do you hit when you are hallucinating? I am not downing any service. I know that most military have the time, and money to be more trained than a LEO. I have demonstrated my issues with the dd214 being accepted by the states. My issue is with the states accepting that as a show of current proficiency, not any issue with the military. What level of training they HAD is irrelevant in this discussion. What is relevant is how long it has been since you have shown you can still safely operate that weapon. A reasonable time should be the same for everyone. You are stone cold out of dialogue is the reason you keep bringing that shit up. The only thing I have stated about your hated "good old boy" network is the FEDERAL LAW mandates that police qualify ANNUALLY which (yayy) is above and beyond the requirements of a DD214 CCW, or private CCW process.

How many of those 490 days did he host and meet with other world leaders, and take care of business as normal but remotely? He did go there but many of those days it was "work from the ranch days", not all idle days roping cows.

He dodged that question like a rodeo clown dodging a bull.

Once again no one but you is still talking about the level of training, it is about the elapsed time since you have proved you are still up to a safe level, and have not had life altering changes in your physical or mental state that would make you a danger to others when carrying a weapon. Obviously someone who was a military MP, and just got out 2 years ago is not who I am talking about. I am worried about the cook with a pistol qualification who got out 30 years ago, has never held a pistol since then and has had a stroke and has poor eyesight from cataracts. At this point I either think you understand what I am getting at but are acting obtuse to keep up the arguement, or you have something else going on. Either way you are making a fool of yourself by going against your stated opinions here on gun safety by thinking the above described person is safe to carry a weapon without demonstrating it just because he WAS trained by the all mighty military 30 years ago. SMH