brenthutch

Yo duds its the corperations. (sounds of bong water bubbling) Haliburton, blood for oil, dick cheney, carl rove, black water, suvs, george bush. How cold will it have to get, how much sea ice will have to grow how many glaciers will have to revocer before you say that you were wrong.

during the rodny king riots in LA a Korean shopkeeper protected his property by meerly brandishing a scary looking ar15. No shots fired no one hurt.

You are not far off of the mark. I used to work at a bar. One night the door opened and in came a priest, rabbi and a midget. I looked up and said "what is this, some kind of a joke"

estimation

Pick your cherries and build your strawmen.

What do you base your "estemation" on?

same thing happened to me in NJ but it was a public option. What is your point?

As an Airborne Ranger I hosted a contingent of French Comandos during an exchange with my LRSD unit. The French were blown away with our POW's (privatly owned wepons) They said if such wepons were availabel in France that even an honest man would turn into a bank rober. Their point of view was as informitave as it was shocking. It seemed their understanding of POW's was inversly preportional to their exposure to them. This prompted my First Sgt come up with an old latin phrase: aben-aden-donus..... aint been nowhere aint done nothin dont know sh*t to describe such people. A perfect example of this can be seen on utube. It is a congresswomen advocating the banning of "barral shrouds" Worth a look. Oh BTW aimed semi auto is vastly more lethal than full auto and one would know this if one was not abenadendonus (or French).

the lapses in logic are unforgivable

Because Kalland is an uneducated douchebag

Oh one more thing, I keep it at a fourth grade level so you can keep up.

fair enough, please address my point of how NASA's raw data should be public, not state secrets as you would suggest

Too easy... Given the choice of hyperbole or supstance you jump to the former. Try to deal with the supstance. Oh thats rite u cant. (now attack my spuling und puntuation)

Ok June bug, sarcasm aside, reply to my point that tax payer financed, raw data should be available to the public without being filtered. If we were interested on pure science it shoulc not matter.

Crickets....crickets.....

NASA's data is our data, not some "politically motivated jerk" that works for NASA. We can all look at it together. Unless........

My point was that just because one can not spell or punctuate does not mean that their ideas have no merit.

Apparently you dont understand what you write.

hoisted by his own petard

Thanks Kallend. good read! I quite like this part. "Mann explained. Sometimes the data didn't line up as perfectly as scientists wanted. David Rind told colleagues about inconsistent figures in the work for a giant international report: "As this continuing exchange has clarified, what's in Chapter 6 is inconsistent with what is in Chapter 2 (and Chapter 9 is caught in the middle!). Worse yet, we've managed to make global warming go away!" Yes AGW is unquestionable, the science is settled.

I originally asked for rebuttal of claims made on the first video. The response was: Spoiler: He's a Bible-thumping moron with no science background and thinks everyone with AIDS should be quarantined. Then I asked about a second person's claims, and the response was: A conservative politician with no science background? At no time did anyone take on the factual claims made by these people. Please refute the facts, not the folks.

The ad hominem argument is the last resort for one who has run out of ideas.

so you think that global warming is silly???

Then why do contractors still help run drone strikes in PK?

Apparently it IS Mann made! (Dr. Michael Mann for those on the left)