mdwhalen 0 #1 December 17, 2008 On December 11th the Florida Supreme Court ruled that a parent may not legally bind a minor by executing a pre-injury release for a commercial activity. So even if the parents sign a release on behalf of their child, the child can still sue. The action arose out of a minor's death at an ATV track but the ruling would certainly apply to any commercial activity in which a minor could be injured or killed. The decision raises a lot of questions: does it apply to school related sports and activities will the state legislature respond? The Supreme Court saw it is a balancing of parents' rights against the state's right to protect children. The decision resolves a conflict in decisions by lower courts around the state. If you are interested in reading the whole opinion it is reported at Kirton v. Fields, 33 Fla.L.Weekly S939 (Fla. December 11, 2008)."I have magic buttons ;)." skymama Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Orange1 0 #2 December 17, 2008 See also this thread http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3220566;search_string=ATV;#3220566 for "background" discussionSkydiving: wasting fossil fuels just for fun. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CSpenceFLY 1 #3 December 17, 2008 Pretty soon you won't be able to let your kids out of the house or there will be no activity that will allow kids. Everyone thank a fucking lawyer for all the things we can't do because of liability. When will we stand up and say enough is enough? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Skwrl 56 #4 December 17, 2008 It's not too surprising, given the trend that Florida and other states have been following. I would expect you will see similar results in other states. (I'm not saying it's good policy, I'm simply saying that I'm not surprised it turned out this way.) Net result for DZ owners: if you want to (help) make sure your DZ's waiver is effective, don't accept waivers unless the skydivers/students are at least the age of majority in your state (and check their ID). If you want to roll the dice anyway, that's up to you, but do so knowingly. /Not legal advice.Skwrl Productions - Wingsuit Photography Northeast Bird School - Chief Logistics Guy and Video Dork Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wrightskyguy 1 #5 December 17, 2008 QuoteEveryone thank a fucking lawyer for all the things we can't do because of liability. *** Yeah, thanks Mike...and thank Patty too next time you see her. John Wright World's most beloved skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites skyjumpenfool 2 #6 December 17, 2008 Yep! I'm on the Competition Committee of the Minnesota Supermileage Competition. It's an engineering Challenge where High School kids build small cars to compete for the best fuel economy. We get about 100 cars up to Brainerd International Raceway each spring to test their designs. High School kids building cars that get 800-1500 miles per gallon! And we're watching this stuff really close because our students and their parents all sign waivers. If this is the way of the world, we're about to loose many good things...Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Ion01 1 #7 December 17, 2008 When are people going to not be okay with the state raising our children (communism)? The states teach our kids about sex, right and wrong (more accurately that there is no right or wrong), what to eat, etc. States have even passed laws prohibiting certain food and drinks in schools! And now we have a court saying that parents aren't responsible for thier kids. DZ's are really going to have to watch out as I am sure there are plenty of lawyers ready to cash in on this kind of a ruling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites billvon 2,400 #8 December 17, 2008 Please stick to the skydiving aspects of this. If you would like to start a thread about the political aspects of this decision, please do so in Speaker's Corner. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites pirana 0 #9 December 17, 2008 I agree in general that our society has become way too litiguous; but I think it is a good thing that parents can not sign away a kids rights. IMO, it is each participants duty to know the risks, and each provider of services duty to not be negligent. Regardless of what's in a waiver, if you fuck up you should own up. I really don't understand why it is legal to include language in a contract which absolves people of negligence. As a basketball coach, I could personally care less if they sign the waiver or not, I am going to make every effort to not be negligent. If I am negligent, I deserve to be fucked over, regardless of the paperwork on file. The thing that makes a mess out of it is that the courts appear to be biased on the side of participants/offenders not being responsible for much. As an aside, our school system makes the parents and the kids sign all forms. I don't think they intend to hold the kids legally responsible, just trying to send a message about owning up. Still very bizarre." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites kelpdiver 2 #10 December 17, 2008 QuotePlease stick to the skydiving aspects of this. If you would like to start a thread about the political aspects of this decision, please do so in Speaker's Corner. At least in the US, skydiving and minors are already a pretty much dead topic. A few people are willing and confident to work with the legal risk. I suppose if this continues, I'll have more open ski slopes. But the DZ isn't going to change. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Tuna-Salad 0 #11 December 18, 2008 QuotePretty soon you won't be able to let your kids out of the house or there will be no activity that will allow kids. Everyone thank a fucking lawyer for all the things we can't do because of liability. When will we stand up and say enough is enough? I don't think enough people ever will. Just big brother closing another gate of the fence that already surrounds us.Millions of my potential children died on your daughters' face last night. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites normiss 622 #12 December 18, 2008 Just another attempt by the brother to try and keep a man down! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites diablopilot 2 #13 December 18, 2008 QuoteI really don't understand why it is legal to include language in a contract which absolves people of negligence. Come up with concrete definitions of negligence and I might agree with you, but in a legal system that can be twisted by a good/bad lawyer to show simply exiting an aircraft is negligence then I can't.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites GLIDEANGLE 1 #14 December 19, 2008 I'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!!The choices we make have consequences, for us & for others! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites wolfriverjoe 1,340 #15 December 19, 2008 QuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites MarkM 0 #16 December 29, 2008 QuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites normiss 622 #17 December 29, 2008 And still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites antonija 0 #18 December 29, 2008 QuoteAnd still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. That's why parents signed the waiver, not the minor.I understand the need for conformity. Without a concise set of rules to follow we would probably all have to resort to common sense. -David Thorne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites gravitysurfer 0 #19 December 29, 2008 QuoteQuoteAnd still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. That's why parents signed the waiver, not the minor. Carefully read the post you just replied to. aloha. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andy9o8 0 #20 December 30, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. In most states, and in most cases, that's really not correct, as long as at least 1 of the parents is still living. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Andrewwhyte 1 #21 December 30, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. In most states, and in most cases, that's really not correct, as long as at least 1 of the parents is still living. I've always considered the biggest risk is that the injured minor can sue for themselves upon their 18th birthday. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites Join the conversation You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible. Reply to this topic... × Pasted as rich text. Paste as plain text instead Only 75 emoji are allowed. × Your link has been automatically embedded. Display as a link instead × Your previous content has been restored. Clear editor × You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL. Insert image from URL × Desktop Tablet Phone Submit Reply 0
skyjumpenfool 2 #6 December 17, 2008 Yep! I'm on the Competition Committee of the Minnesota Supermileage Competition. It's an engineering Challenge where High School kids build small cars to compete for the best fuel economy. We get about 100 cars up to Brainerd International Raceway each spring to test their designs. High School kids building cars that get 800-1500 miles per gallon! And we're watching this stuff really close because our students and their parents all sign waivers. If this is the way of the world, we're about to loose many good things...Birdshit & Fools Productions "Son, only two things fall from the sky." Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ion01 1 #7 December 17, 2008 When are people going to not be okay with the state raising our children (communism)? The states teach our kids about sex, right and wrong (more accurately that there is no right or wrong), what to eat, etc. States have even passed laws prohibiting certain food and drinks in schools! And now we have a court saying that parents aren't responsible for thier kids. DZ's are really going to have to watch out as I am sure there are plenty of lawyers ready to cash in on this kind of a ruling. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,400 #8 December 17, 2008 Please stick to the skydiving aspects of this. If you would like to start a thread about the political aspects of this decision, please do so in Speaker's Corner. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pirana 0 #9 December 17, 2008 I agree in general that our society has become way too litiguous; but I think it is a good thing that parents can not sign away a kids rights. IMO, it is each participants duty to know the risks, and each provider of services duty to not be negligent. Regardless of what's in a waiver, if you fuck up you should own up. I really don't understand why it is legal to include language in a contract which absolves people of negligence. As a basketball coach, I could personally care less if they sign the waiver or not, I am going to make every effort to not be negligent. If I am negligent, I deserve to be fucked over, regardless of the paperwork on file. The thing that makes a mess out of it is that the courts appear to be biased on the side of participants/offenders not being responsible for much. As an aside, our school system makes the parents and the kids sign all forms. I don't think they intend to hold the kids legally responsible, just trying to send a message about owning up. Still very bizarre." . . . the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging them and kicking them into obedience." -- Aldous Huxley Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #10 December 17, 2008 QuotePlease stick to the skydiving aspects of this. If you would like to start a thread about the political aspects of this decision, please do so in Speaker's Corner. At least in the US, skydiving and minors are already a pretty much dead topic. A few people are willing and confident to work with the legal risk. I suppose if this continues, I'll have more open ski slopes. But the DZ isn't going to change. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tuna-Salad 0 #11 December 18, 2008 QuotePretty soon you won't be able to let your kids out of the house or there will be no activity that will allow kids. Everyone thank a fucking lawyer for all the things we can't do because of liability. When will we stand up and say enough is enough? I don't think enough people ever will. Just big brother closing another gate of the fence that already surrounds us.Millions of my potential children died on your daughters' face last night. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #12 December 18, 2008 Just another attempt by the brother to try and keep a man down! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
diablopilot 2 #13 December 18, 2008 QuoteI really don't understand why it is legal to include language in a contract which absolves people of negligence. Come up with concrete definitions of negligence and I might agree with you, but in a legal system that can be twisted by a good/bad lawyer to show simply exiting an aircraft is negligence then I can't.---------------------------------------------- You're not as good as you think you are. Seriously. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
GLIDEANGLE 1 #14 December 19, 2008 I'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!!The choices we make have consequences, for us & for others! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wolfriverjoe 1,340 #15 December 19, 2008 QuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues."There are NO situations which do not call for a French Maid outfit." Lucky McSwervy "~ya don't GET old by being weak & stupid!" - Airtwardo Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MarkM 0 #16 December 29, 2008 QuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 622 #17 December 29, 2008 And still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
antonija 0 #18 December 29, 2008 QuoteAnd still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. That's why parents signed the waiver, not the minor.I understand the need for conformity. Without a concise set of rules to follow we would probably all have to resort to common sense. -David Thorne Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
gravitysurfer 0 #19 December 29, 2008 QuoteQuoteAnd still, it's a minor. A minor has not yet reached age of majority. You can't waive rights they don't have. That's why parents signed the waiver, not the minor. Carefully read the post you just replied to. aloha. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #20 December 30, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. In most states, and in most cases, that's really not correct, as long as at least 1 of the parents is still living. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andrewwhyte 1 #21 December 30, 2008 QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteI'll bite... if the kid is dead, who sued on his behalf? Please tell me it wasn't the parents who signed the wavier!!!! Follow Orange1's link in post #2. Parent's divorced. Dad signs waiver, kid dies. Mom sues. And even if both parents signed a waiver, a grandparent could sue. A brother could sue, etc etc. In most states, and in most cases, that's really not correct, as long as at least 1 of the parents is still living. I've always considered the biggest risk is that the injured minor can sue for themselves upon their 18th birthday. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites