1 1
brenthutch

NPR Freaks Out

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, wmw999 said:

Do you have any sort of reference for this? Or is it something that you just expect us to go looking for?

Wendy P.

Twitter labeled NPR as a “State Affiliated Media” (which only makes sense as it is subsidized by the government) and they had a cow.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Twitter labeled NPR as a “State Affiliated Media” (which only makes sense as it is subsidized by the government) and they had a cow.  

I already tire of Elon's purchase of Twitter. What was purported to be a new platform for all to enjoy "Freedom of Speech" has become an all-about-me platform and "my sense of freedom." His labeling of NPR as state-affiliated media is silly. Should we call Tesla a state-affiliated car company given the federal tax breaks and federal loans received. Would he even have SpaceX if it weren't for federal dollars?    

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, wmw999 said:

NPR gets less than 1% of its income from the government. 

Wendy P.

Wrong!
“Presently, NPR receives funding for less than 1% of its budget directly from the federal government, but receives almost 10% of its budget from federal, state, and local governments indirectly.”

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, brenthutch said:

Twitter labeled NPR as a “State Affiliated Media” (which only makes sense as it is subsidized by the government) and they had a cow.  

Since you were unwilling or unable to look into this yourself, I did. Twitter’s own policy is that ‘State affiliated media’ is specifically a label for media outlets were the government have editorial control. Twitter themselves on other parts of their website use NPR as an example of what is not state affiliated media.

 

So NPR are entirely right. Twitter, Musk and you were entirely wrong. Even Musk is already starting to walk back. Will you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jakee said:

Since you were unwilling or unable to look into this yourself, I did. Twitter’s own policy is that ‘State affiliated media’ is specifically a label for media outlets were the government have editorial control. Twitter themselves on other parts of their website use NPR as an example of what is not state affiliated media.

D'oh!

Musk better get out his Sharpie and change "not" to "yes."  Then he can claim it always said that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2023 at 2:29 AM, brenthutch said:

Twitter labeled NPR as a “State Affiliated Media” (which only makes sense as it is subsidized by the government) and they had a cow.  

Brent's definition of 'freaks out' is silence:

Quote

The main NPR account has not tweeted since Twitter first applied the state-affiliated label on Wednesday.

And now:

Quote

Twitter has removed a label that designated NPR as a “US state-affiliated” media outlet mere days after first applying the label earlier this week. As of Saturday, the company now lists the public broadcaster as a “government funded” organization.

Source: https://www.engadget.com/twitter-removes-us-state-affiliated-media-label-from-npr-account-215742901.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
15 hours ago, olofscience said:

Twitter has removed a label that designated NPR as a “US state-affiliated” media outlet mere days after first applying the label earlier this week. As of Saturday, the company now lists the public broadcaster as a “government funded” organization.

If this were Russia, a Twitter content manager would now be accidentally falling out a window.  

But since it's not, hopefully he will only be fired.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, ryoder said:

Elon is a busy man. He has no time to spend checking facts when a whim comes to him about something as small as this. Besides, when you spend enough of other people's money to acquire control of a shiny new toy you expect to be able to play with it however you like. Yet somehow his fans still think he will send people to Mars and that Tesla won't eventually be swamped by real car companies. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

Yet somehow his fans still think he will send people to Mars and that Tesla won't eventually be swamped by real car companies. 

And Full Self Driving will be here real soon now, within 12 months!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ryoder said:

These are questions you can get by Googling, but for some reason he wanted to ask me. And also, let's take a moment and pause on these questions, Mary Louise, because he made a major policy decision, right? And after doing so, he is just now asking for the basic facts.

 

No great surprise, since that’s how he bought Twitter in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, jakee said:

These are questions you can get by Googling, but for some reason he wanted to ask me. And also, let's take a moment and pause on these questions, Mary Louise, because he made a major policy decision, right? And after doing so, he is just now asking for the basic facts.

 

No great surprise, since that’s how he bought Twitter in the first place.

And, of course, gullible fools believed what he said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, gowlerk said:

A teacher made us memorize that song in grade 7. But shouldn't it be canceled these days for the derogatory reference to NY sex trade workers?

Children might hear it!  After all, they are being traumatized by a picture of someone on a beer can; a song would be even worse!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, billvon said:

Children might hear it!  After all, they are being traumatized by a picture of someone on a beer can; a song would be even worse!

Or be asked to suck the Dalai Lama's tongue. Nah, never happen and if it did it was just a joke. He's such a spiritual cut-up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/6/2023 at 10:01 PM, wmw999 said:

NPR gets less than 1% of its income from the government. It'd be much more accurate to call Clarence Thomas a donation-supported Supreme Court Justice.

Wendy P.

“NPR wants to have it both ways: Its supporters say less than 1 percent of its funding comes from the government but its website claims "federal funding is essential to public radio's service to the American public." It wants to continue holding out its hands for government funding, but it also wants to brag about complete and total editorial independence—two ideas held in tension—while developing quite the reputation for lefty bias (backed up by the Knight Foundation and Pew Research Center audience polling), which leaves conservative and libertarian taxpayers' stomachs churning.”

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, brenthutch said:

“NPR wants to have it both ways: Its supporters say less than 1 percent of its funding comes from the government but its website claims "federal funding is essential to public radio's service to the American public." It wants to continue holding out its hands for government funding, but it also wants to brag about complete and total editorial independence

So in other words it's like every oil company in America.

Quote

which leaves conservative and libertarian taxpayers' stomachs churning.”

It leaves their stomach churning because they disagree with the news.  Hearing that oil companies get far more will calm their digestion in no time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
(edited)
43 minutes ago, billvon said:

So in other words it's like every oil company in America.

It leaves their stomach churning because they disagree with the news.  Hearing that oil companies get far more will calm their digestion in no time.

You need those oil companies, the taxes on their products pay for your roads. How much infrastructure does NPR pay for?

“State Excise Tax Pays for Highways and Roads. In 2022-23, the state gasoline excise tax is set at 53.9 cents per gallon, and the tax is expected to raise $7.4 billion from gasoline purchases for vehicles using public roads.”

 

Edited by brenthutch

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

1 1