SkyDekker 1,341 #151 April 9, 2014 You are saying that with your new laws, I could break my leg today. Go to the ER, get it all set and cast. Then buy insurance tomorrow and they would pay the ER bill? Or are you saying that I can buy insurance today, and it would cover the Chemo treatment I have scheduled for Friday due to the cancer I already had? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #152 April 9, 2014 SkyDekkerYou are saying that with your new laws, I could break my leg today. Go to the ER, get it all set and cast. Then buy insurance tomorrow and they would pay the ER bill? Or are you saying that I can buy insurance today, and it would cover the Chemo treatment I have scheduled for Friday due to the cancer I already had? I have read both but I would be more inclined to believe the latter"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,341 #153 April 9, 2014 I would believe the latter to be the truth as well. So that is basically the same as auto insurance then. Future costs related to a "pre-existing" condition are covered. If I am known to have a problem with speeding, evidenced by speeding tickets (or falling within the paramaters of a group known for speeding) my premiums go up, but I would still be covered for the costs associated with an accident, even if it was the result of speeding. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #154 April 9, 2014 >I don't think you understand the difference between health care and health insurance. Thank you for proving my point. Yes, it is somewhat silly to compare car insurance to health coverage. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,792 #155 April 9, 2014 >The Hobby Lobby case requires the court to decide whether a corporation has >sincere religious beliefs that would be compromised by having its health plan cover >the contraception that it once covered because it believes that contraception >causes abortions . . . . Although one good way to reduce the need to cover contraceptives is to . . . implement the ACA. =================== Study Finds Sicklier Enrollees in Earliest Stage of Health Law By KATIE THOMASAPRIL 9, 2014 People who signed up early for insurance through the new marketplaces were more likely to be prescribed drugs to treat pain, depression and H.I.V. and were less likely to need contraceptives, according to a new study that provides a much-anticipated look at the population that signed up for coverage under the new health care law. ==================== Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #156 July 28, 2014 And now here come the unintended consequences... OH BUT THAT IS DIFFERENT.. Let the games begin http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/28/satanists-want-to-use-hobby-lobby-decision-to-exempt-women-from-anti-abortion-laws/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,589 #157 July 30, 2014 How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/"There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #158 July 30, 2014 ryoderHow awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ Hey the mother gave birth... there is no longer a fetus so the fake family values of Hobby Lobby are on display once the child was born. The mother and child no longer matter to the fake family values aka pro life crowd. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
normiss 737 #159 July 30, 2014 "“They didn’t even want me to come back after having my baby, to provide for it,” Felicia Allen" Maybe the pregnancy wasn't actually WHY they didn't want it back. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #160 July 30, 2014 ryoderHow awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok?"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #161 July 30, 2014 rushmc***How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok? Would a public stoning of that slut suffice for Hobby Lobby since that would be part of their closely held beliefs for a single unwed mother???? Another Link..... and one picture saves a thousand words. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #162 July 30, 2014 Amazon******How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok? Would a public stoning of that slut suffice for Hobby Lobby since that would be part of their closely held beliefs for a single unwed mother???? Another Link..... and one picture saves a thousand words. Wow such anger and vitriol BTW NO ONE is being denied anything Please stop the lie"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #163 July 30, 2014 rushmc *********How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok? Would a public stoning of that slut suffice for Hobby Lobby since that would be part of their closely held beliefs for a single unwed mother???? Another Link..... and one picture saves a thousand words. Wow such anger and vitriol BTW NO ONE is being denied anything Please stop the lie Are you capable of actually reading the articles or do you just assume all the wonderfully enlightened insight into conservative thought that you post daily?? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
dpreguy 14 #164 July 30, 2014 To qualify for the benefit of maternal leave to give birth, you have to have worked at a company for a certain length of time. Simple as that. If the 'time of employment period' wasn't in place, the maternal leave benefit would be gamed. If Catholic hospitals are exempted, then hobby lobby should be too. ( the "non profit" tax status crap is a silly distinction) All of the venom pointed at hobby lobby in this thread should be equally spewed against Catholic hospitals, who employ hundreds of thousands. Can't have it both ways. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #165 July 30, 2014 dpreguyTo qualify for the benefit of maternal leave to give birth, you have to have worked at a company for a certain length of time. Simple as that. If the 'time of employment period' wasn't in place, the maternal leave benefit would be gamed. If Catholic hospitals are exempted, then hobby lobby should be too. ( the "non profit" tax status crap is a silly distinction) All of the venom pointed at hobby lobby in this thread should be equally spewed against Catholic hospitals, who employ hundreds of thousands. Can't have it both ways. It's the right wing Christian thing to do since family values are not really what their DEEDS are showing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #166 July 30, 2014 dpreguyTo qualify for the benefit of maternal leave to give birth, you have to have worked at a company for a certain length of time. Simple as that. If the 'time of employment period' wasn't in place, the maternal leave benefit would be gamed. The article seems to show that she was just looking to resume working 3 weeks after birth, not that she was seeking federally mandated benefits that she did not qualify for. And to be precise, there's no "have to have worked" in this - she notified her employer of the situation and was assured that this was alright. The irony of this all was written later in the article in that HL forces all employees to agree to arbitration for disputes. “I think it’s an interesting confluence here with Hobby Lobby being in the news with that big case, but if that were an employment case where an employee wanted to make a claim, we would never see that case at the Supreme Court because it would be stayed in arbitration,” Colvin said. “So, ironically, Hobby Lobby gets to go to the Supreme Court because they want to challenge this, but their own employees don’t get to go to court.” Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #167 July 31, 2014 kelpdiver ***To qualify for the benefit of maternal leave to give birth, you have to have worked at a company for a certain length of time. Simple as that. If the 'time of employment period' wasn't in place, the maternal leave benefit would be gamed. The article seems to show that she was just looking to resume working 3 weeks after birth, not that she was seeking federally mandated benefits that she did not qualify for. And to be precise, there's no "have to have worked" in this - she notified her employer of the situation and was assured that this was alright. The irony of this all was written later in the article in that HL forces all employees to agree to arbitration for disputes. “I think it’s an interesting confluence here with Hobby Lobby being in the news with that big case, but if that were an employment case where an employee wanted to make a claim, we would never see that case at the Supreme Court because it would be stayed in arbitration,” Colvin said. “So, ironically, Hobby Lobby gets to go to the Supreme Court because they want to challenge this, but their own employees don’t get to go to court.” I especially LOVE this snip from the other article concerning this case.... But Hobby Lobby is unusual in its allowance for Christian-influenced arbitration overseen by either the American Arbitration Association (AAA) or the Institute for Christian Conciliation (ICC). While the secular AAA is the largest dispute-resolution provider in the U.S., ICC is operated by Peacemaker Ministries – which teaches that Christians may not sue other Christians but must instead resolve disputes within the church. So not sueing others is now a closely held Christian value??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BartsDaddy 5 #168 July 31, 2014 I am not a religious person. But if that is a christian virtue. I wish more people had it. Use to be two or more people could talk out there differences and come to an amicable solution. Anymore that is hard to do because people are advised don't say anything and contact a lawyer to sue and see how much money you can get. Handguns are only used to fight your way to a good rifle Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #169 July 31, 2014 BartsDaddyI am not a religious person. But if that is a christian virtue. I wish more people had it. Use to be two or more people could talk out there differences and come to an amicable solution. Anymore that is hard to do because people are advised don't say anything and contact a lawyer to sue and see how much money you can get. Interesting though that a couple of owners who expect and demand that others follow their deeply held beliefs.. would expect their employees to abide by something the owners supposedly believe in.. and then sue others all the way to the Supreme Court... What is that called again??? I am searching for the right word here... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #170 July 31, 2014 Amazon ************How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok? Would a public stoning of that slut suffice for Hobby Lobby since that would be part of their closely held beliefs for a single unwed mother???? Another Link..... and one picture saves a thousand words. Wow such anger and vitriol BTW NO ONE is being denied anything Please stop the lie Are you capable of actually reading the articles or do you just assume all the wonderfully enlightened insight into conservative thought that you post daily??I am capable of staying on the subject You only show emotion and moving goal posts Again NO ONE is being denied anything"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #171 July 31, 2014 rushmc ***************How awkward: http://www.salon.com/2014/07/29/hobby_lobby_alleged_to_have_fired_a_pregnant_employee_who_requested_time_off_to_give_birth/ So you think you have the total story? I think I will wait a bit and see of another side of this surfaces But you and Amazon, have a blast with in now. Ok? Would a public stoning of that slut suffice for Hobby Lobby since that would be part of their closely held beliefs for a single unwed mother???? Another Link..... and one picture saves a thousand words. Wow such anger and vitriol BTW NO ONE is being denied anything Please stop the lie Are you capable of actually reading the articles or do you just assume all the wonderfully enlightened insight into conservative thought that you post daily??I am capable of staying on the subject You only show emotion and moving goal posts Again NO ONE is being denied anything So much "truthiness" so little reality Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kelpdiver 2 #172 July 31, 2014 rushmc Again NO ONE is being denied anything Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #173 August 1, 2014 kelpdiver*** Again NO ONE is being denied anything Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean. this thread is about birth control Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased So, NO ONE is being denied anything If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #174 August 1, 2014 rushmc****** Again NO ONE is being denied anything Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean. this thread is about birth control Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased So, NO ONE is being denied anything If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it I really wish you would. Your support for corporate hypocrisy is quite interesting but not surprising Marc. They fired a pregnant woman, she was not looking to get an abortion with any of the things the owners of the corporation find so abhorrent with their closely held beliefs. But yet their investment portfolio has all of the companies in it who produce those drugs. They would not rehire her after the baby was born They want children to be born by any means no matter how that man gets in there for the genetic win. They do not want to support the children born to women after their closely held beliefs have the usual outcome. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 21 #175 August 1, 2014 Amazon********* Again NO ONE is being denied anything Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean. this thread is about birth control Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased So, NO ONE is being denied anything If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it I really wish you would. Your support for corporate hypocrisy is quite interesting but not surprising Marc. They fired a pregnant woman, she was not looking to get an abortion with any of the things the owners of the corporation find so abhorrent with their closely held beliefs. But yet their investment portfolio has all of the companies in it who produce those drugs. They would not rehire her after the baby was born They want children to be born by any means no matter how that man gets in there for the genetic win. They do not want to support the children born to women after their closely held beliefs have the usual outcome. Start a new thread"America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites