0
kallend

The Hobby Lobby case

Recommended Posts

rushmc

************
Again
NO ONE is being denied anything



Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean.

this thread is about birth control

Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object
And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased

So, NO ONE is being denied anything

If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it

I really wish you would.

Your support for corporate hypocrisy is quite interesting but not surprising Marc.

They fired a pregnant woman, she was not looking to get an abortion with any of the things the owners of the corporation find so abhorrent with their closely held beliefs. But yet their investment portfolio has all of the companies in it who produce those drugs.

They would not rehire her after the baby was born

They want children to be born by any means no matter how that man gets in there for the genetic win.
They do not want to support the children born to women after their closely held beliefs have the usual outcome.

Start a new thread

NO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Amazon

***************
Again
NO ONE is being denied anything



Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean.

this thread is about birth control

Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object
And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased

So, NO ONE is being denied anything

If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it

I really wish you would.

Your support for corporate hypocrisy is quite interesting but not surprising Marc.

They fired a pregnant woman, she was not looking to get an abortion with any of the things the owners of the corporation find so abhorrent with their closely held beliefs. But yet their investment portfolio has all of the companies in it who produce those drugs.

They would not rehire her after the baby was born

They want children to be born by any means no matter how that man gets in there for the genetic win.
They do not want to support the children born to women after their closely held beliefs have the usual outcome.

Start a new thread

NO

then you got nothing to say
Good!
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

******************
Again
NO ONE is being denied anything



Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean.

this thread is about birth control

Hobby Lobby only objects to 3 or 4 of the 16 available and will pay (though its health insurance) for those to which it does not object
And those 3 or 4 can still be purchased

So, NO ONE is being denied anything

If we must have the debate, let's at least be honest about it

I really wish you would.

Your support for corporate hypocrisy is quite interesting but not surprising Marc.

They fired a pregnant woman, she was not looking to get an abortion with any of the things the owners of the corporation find so abhorrent with their closely held beliefs. But yet their investment portfolio has all of the companies in it who produce those drugs.

They would not rehire her after the baby was born

They want children to be born by any means no matter how that man gets in there for the genetic win.
They do not want to support the children born to women after their closely held beliefs have the usual outcome.

Start a new thread

NO

then you got nothing to say
Good!

Already said the pertinent bits... but SOMONE cain't handle THE TRUTH:ph34r::ph34r:

But you go right ahead now.. and DEFEND the indefensible by corporate America especially those with those deeply held beliefs that they can treat their minions and the American people as the new peasant class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rushmc

******
Again
NO ONE is being denied anything



Other than unpaid sick leave or employment, you mean.

this thread is about birth control


Actually, no. You replied to her post discussing the termination of the woman who had a child. You had replied previously (#160) as well and on the new topic. So why now are you trying to pretend that we can only discuss one topic? Is it the lack of a response? Or are you promising all that you will never participate in thread drift again?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0