ryoder 1,390 #26 December 7, 2009 Quote I remember years ago touring a General Dynamics facility and seeing the ejection 'pod' mock up for the F-111. IIRC, that was for three crew members...A kind of Star Wars escape capsule, long before the movie. TWO crew members, unless you have Kelly McGillis sitting on your lap."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #27 December 7, 2009 Quote Quote I remember years ago touring a General Dynamics facility and seeing the ejection 'pod' mock up for the F-111. IIRC, that was for three crew members...A kind of Star Wars escape capsule, long before the movie. TWO crew members, unless you have Kelly McGillis sitting on your lap. Wrong branch man...plus, she's batting for the other team now....So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,390 #28 December 7, 2009 Quote Quote Quote I remember years ago touring a General Dynamics facility and seeing the ejection 'pod' mock up for the F-111. IIRC, that was for three crew members...A kind of Star Wars escape capsule, long before the movie. TWO crew members, unless you have Kelly McGillis sitting on your lap. Wrong branch man...plus, she's batting for the other team now.... Well, there was a Navy version in the original plans for the F-111, until the Navy pulled out of the project and started the F-14 project. It had a shorter nose, and shorter wings to fit carriers."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gawain 0 #29 December 7, 2009 Quote Quote Quote Quote I remember years ago touring a General Dynamics facility and seeing the ejection 'pod' mock up for the F-111. IIRC, that was for three crew members...A kind of Star Wars escape capsule, long before the movie. TWO crew members, unless you have Kelly McGillis sitting on your lap. Wrong branch man...plus, she's batting for the other team now.... Well, there was a Navy version in the original plans for the F-111, until the Navy pulled out of the project and started the F-14 project. It had a shorter nose, and shorter wings to fit carriers. Well, yeah, the Tomcat was about 10ft shorter, but both had variable geometry wings, which the F-111's span was just a tad shorter when swept or spread...plus...she's still batting for the other team...So I try and I scream and I beg and I sigh Just to prove I'm alive, and it's alright 'Cause tonight there's a way I'll make light of my treacherous life Make light! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kkeenan 13 #30 December 7, 2009 One of my favorites, as a kid in the 60s, was the F-104. That was a seriously fast fighter, basicly designed to haul ass and intercept incoming bombers. So, it turns out that we have some new neighbors where I work (Kennedy Space Ctr.). Starfighters, Inc. operates a fleet of civilian F-104s that will be used in high-altitude research under a contract with NASA, and will be operated out of a hangar at the Shuttle Landing facility. since this is down the road from my office, I cruised over to take a look and have attached this photo. KSC is a pretty cool place to work, but this just made it better. Info about Starfighters, Inc. http://www.starfighters.net/News_-_Top.html I think they're mainly going to be in the business of "Sub-Orbital Spaceflight Training", which pretty much means taking rich guys up for expensive rides and making them puke. I hear there's a lot of money in that. Still a very cool airplane. Kevin K._____________________________________ Dude, you are so awesome... Can I be on your ash jump ? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ryoder 1,390 #31 December 7, 2009 Quote Quote Well, there was a Navy version in the original plans for the F-111, until the Navy pulled out of the project and started the F-14 project. It had a shorter nose, and shorter wings to fit carriers. Well, yeah, the Tomcat was about 10ft shorter, but both had variable geometry wings, which the F-111's span was just a tad shorter when swept or spread...plus...she's still batting for the other team... I think you misunderstood my last line. The planned Navy F-111 had a shorter nose and shorter wings. In fact, the reason the F-111 had side-by-side seating was to make it short enough for carrier ops. The whole project started when someone got the idea that a single a/c could serve both as an USAF bomber, and a Navy fighter. The Navy finally extricated its self from the project and left it all to USAF."There are only three things of value: younger women, faster airplanes, and bigger crocodiles" - Arthur Jones. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futuredivot 0 #32 December 7, 2009 Sorry-Real airplanes burn AVgas -kerosene is what you use to heat the hangarYou are only as strong as the prey you devour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BDashe 0 #33 December 7, 2009 My all time fave is still and I think always will be the P-51 Mustang. I think it is the sexiest plane ever created and was a major factor in gaining air superiority in the european theater. Fast as all hell for the time period and carried 6 cannons, hell yes. Is there anyone that doesn't like that sound as they fly by with the prop tips exceeding the speed of sound? Went from design to finished product in only 117 days, pretty awesome.So there I was... Making friends and playing nice since 1983 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
aphid 0 #34 December 7, 2009 My first submission for consideration is not loud, but is certainly proud. The backstory: (WW2) More than 130,000 Allied aircrew received their initial flight training in Canada under the Commonwealth Air Training Program. This represents more than 50% of all the allied aircrew of all the forces in all the theatres of the conflict. Putting this in perspective, the US trained about 18,000 foreign aircrew. These young men and women*, (a disproportionate number the sons and daughters of farmers and factory workers), were initially trained on this; the DeHavilland Tiger Moth: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/De_Havilland_Tiger_Moth After initial flight-training, pilot candidates were progressed to this (loud radial engines are way cool); the Canadian Car & Foundry Harvard, or in the US, the North American T6 Texan: http://www.airplane-pictures.net/search.php?p=Harvard&Submit=Search While these aircraft individually may not be considered "great" in the annals of speed, armament, or design sexiness, they live on unparalleled in the hearts and history of so many men and women* when they first "touched the face of God" in flight. *Women were indeed trained under the program and they served an invaluable role as WAC ferry-pilots from North America to Europe, and later as pilot-instructors in the program. Anyway, now I'll let you guys get back to the fast-movers... before I get started talking about the Canadian DeHavilland twin and single Otter's, or the Beaver, or the Buffalo, or the..... :) John Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 6 #35 December 7, 2009 Quote Sorry-Real airplanes burn AVgas -kerosene is what you use to heat the hangar ~ Damn Skippy they do! http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=775662#775662 ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,402 #36 December 7, 2009 The F-104 isn't an airplane; it's an engine with fins. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EvilEagle 0 #37 December 7, 2009 Quote The F-15 Eagle is one of the most successful fighters of all time. It's kill ratio in combat is over 100 to 0, yes ZERO. An F-15 has never been shot down by an enemy aircraft. Now that's badass. 104 - 0 to be precise! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EvilEagle 0 #38 December 7, 2009 Quote Oh yeah? Land one on a fuckin' BOAT......AT NIGHT! Tomcat~ when ya care enough to send the very best! The Tom-grape? Really? The Super Hornet is pretty badass, just not very fast. The old grape was just like picking on the short bus kids. It was fun, and it made you feel good about yourself, but the Tomcat was more suited to fight the likes of the F-4, not 4th Gen fighters. As the carrier bubbas - unless it's REALLY dark and REALLY crappy wx, you just put the thing on the thing (velocity vector on the approach end) and wait for the colllision. Plus - you never have a crosswind! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,402 #39 December 7, 2009 >Plus - you never have a crosswind! On the minus side, no airport I've ever landed at has been going up and down at the time. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
phantomII 36 #40 December 7, 2009 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-4_Phantom_II ...because it's badass and I got 2800 hrs as WSO in it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shropshire 0 #41 December 7, 2009 You lot are soooooo far off the mark ......... Nuff said (.)Y(.) Chivalry is not dead; it only sleeps for want of work to do. - Jerome K Jerome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SARLDO 0 #42 December 7, 2009 Some great aircraft mentioned here. I would like to submit this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-6_intruder A workhorse for the Navy for over 30 years. Retired by age and smarter weapons, but nothing in it's time could deliver more ordnance to our enemies front door, on very short notice, turn around quickly, and do it again."Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest" ~Samuel Clemens MB#4300 Dudeist Skydiver #68 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
futuredivot 0 #43 December 7, 2009 Quote On the minus side, no airport I've ever landed at has been going up and down at the time. You must actually follow that 8 hour bottle to throttle BSYou are only as strong as the prey you devour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Heatmiser 0 #44 December 7, 2009 Don't know about a great plane, but this was quite a testimony to determination. What you say is reflective of your knowledge...HOW ya say it is reflective of your experience. Airtwardo Someone's going to be spanked! Hopefully, it will be me. Skymama Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
EvilEagle 0 #45 December 8, 2009 Quote>Plus - you never have a crosswind! On the minus side, no airport I've ever landed at has been going up and down at the time. Valid. On the plus side, I've never seen an Air Force base that has 3,000 of your closest friends and only 20 girls. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 6 #46 December 8, 2009 QuoteQuote>Plus - you never have a crosswind! On the minus side, no airport I've ever landed at has been going up and down at the time. Valid. On the plus side, I've never seen an Air Force base that has 3,000 of your closest friends and only 20 girls. Air Force still issuing it's officers pajamas? ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 14 #47 December 8, 2009 Quote The F-104 isn't an airplane; it's an engine with fins. It's the Missle with a Man in it.One of my favorites as a kid. I remember seeing it making a 600 mph low pass at an airshow, then pulling out and lighting up the burner. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
JohnMitchell 14 #48 December 8, 2009 Quote My all time fave is still and I think always will be the P-51 Mustang. I think it is the sexiest plane ever created and was a major factor in gaining air superiority in the european theater. Fast as all hell for the time period and carried 6 cannons, hell yes. My in-laws have a friend that owns a pair of those. My mother-in-law actually got me a ride in one of them, no charge. Now I can't make mother in law jokes for a decade or two.BTW, the P-51, and most American fighters, had Browning .50 caliber machine guns, not cannons, which usually start at 20mm or so (.80 caliber.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
airtwardo 6 #49 December 8, 2009 Quote Quote My all time fave is still and I think always will be the P-51 Mustang. I think it is the sexiest plane ever created and was a major factor in gaining air superiority in the european theater. Fast as all hell for the time period and carried 6 cannons, hell yes. My in-laws have a friend that owns a pair of those. My mother-in-law actually got me a ride in one of them, no charge. Now I can't make mother in law jokes for a decade or two.BTW, the P-51, and most American fighters, had Browning .50 caliber machine guns, not cannons, which usually start at 20mm or so (.80 caliber.) And why?? Because they COULD! They were B.T.W. not the same Ma Deuce .50's people usually think of today. Browning's aircraft version had a different kinda lube set up, and a rate of fire quite a bit faster that the ground pound-er units. Don't know if it's still configured that same way, but I knew a guy at Oshkosh that had his Mustang, 99.9% set up as 'factory new'...just needed to install the firing pins! ~ If you choke a Smurf, what color does it turn? ~ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beerlight 0 #50 December 8, 2009 My friend (a PSD tech), spoke to an SR pilot after he returned from a mission over North Vietnam. Stated they took it to Mach 5....accidentally. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
