0
TomAiello

Stealth BASE Canopy

Recommended Posts

Does anyone have any information about the Stealth BASE canopy?

Anyone in Carolina happen to be a test jumper, and want to tell us about this thing?

I've heard absolutely nothing about it, although from the web page it looks like it's been on the market for over a year. I only found it when cruising around that web page looking for something else.
-- Tom Aiello

[email protected]
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Stealth BASE Canopy ? Wow, that BASE canopy came out of nowhere.
Pretty nil on the info. What the hell ? - Just chose a size. - E-mail the money. Sight un-seen - With no history of BASE ?
Where are these New BASE canopies coming FROM ?
-
Hey just questions off the top of my head before Pre-Purchase of something New. To trust as to NOT have bones hanging out of my body. After jumpig a New Wing.
What Canopy is it patterned after ?
Is it an original Canopy design ?
Who did they sub-contract the work to. For production ?
or - Is it sewn In-House for sales ?
Where is the proto canopy ?
Where are the pictures ?
Who put the test jumps on it ?
How many test jumps ?
Has it even been test jumped by a BASE jumper Qualified to make assessments of quality ?
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Don't know if you are aware of this but the manufacturer is a dropzone.com member and poster.
Skydiving Fatalities - Cease not to learn 'til thou cease to live

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mel at Skyworks told me some about it. He is very knowledgeable of parachutes and with what i know of his product, it should get a fair evaluation and then opinions' can flow..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi Guys,

No, The Stealth did not come out of nowhere!
It has been around almost 6 years.
The design is borrowed from the Sharpcuter, but has a alot of differences.
The rib is basically the same. Different top skins and slightly modified bottom skins.
It also was the first canopy around that implemented direct line attachment stabs. (The stabs are smaller than the SC).
The direct line stabs were geared to assure on heading openings alot like the rudder on a surfboard or waterski. and they work!!!

The canopy was intially test jumped by myself and Tony Herring. Tony used it for the Carolina Boogie if you know what and where. Base 515 was with him most of the time.

The canopy is cut and sewn by Flight Concepts and then we line them.
Red Payne at FCI can also give you some info.
It is a great canopy and I use it also for demo jumps... great landings!


MEL
Skyworks Parachute Service, LLC
www.Skyworksparachuteservice.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What are direct line attachment stabs?

Are these the flares that were common on, for example, Glide Path's Fury canopy? I thought those were more for strength than heading quality during canopy pressurization.

thanks, Chris
Looks like a death sandwich without the bread - Steve Deadman Morrell, BASE 174

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
..."The design is borrowed from the Sharpcuter, but has a alot of differences."
-
Don't know but I am just assuming that the, Sharcuter was an older 7-cell. Never jumped a BASE modified Sharpcuter. Others I have jumped though.
A lot of the older 7-cells like. Fury, Crus-lite, Pegasus. Had exceptional inflation qualities. When modified for BASE.
I think the Fury had the line attachments (v-tabs) also.
.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think he meant Sharpchuter. Which was also in the family of Glide Path canopies. Glide Path went out of business for reasons unrelated to the Sharpchuter series of canopies. The Mojo from what I've read was based on the Fury and Sharpchuter canopies.
Looks like a death sandwich without the bread - Steve Deadman Morrell, BASE 174

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

It has been around almost 6 years.



Are there any BASE jumpers who are currently, actively jumping the canopy, that might be able to offer comments on it?

Also, can you tell us what sizes are currently available? Your web site seems to imply that the only size available presently is the 260ish one. Is that still the case?
-- Tom Aiello

[email protected]
SnakeRiverBASE.com

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I've done about 10 or so Jumps on a stealth 245. Good Canopy, On-heading openings, solid control. Still have it in my possession. I've jumped several other canopies, and I own an Ace, and in my opinion, I would compare it to a Mojo. If you want more info on the canopies spec.'s, you can contact Joe, Mel, or Red at Flight Concepts. PM me if you need there contact info. Joe said that they make 245, 265, and 290sq. ft.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hey Chris,

Just out of curiosity, if you own the Ace but compare the Stealth to a Mojo, how many jumps do you have on the Mojo?

Man I loved my Mojo...

Katie.

PS Your dad is the man;)


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Just out of curiosity, if you own the Ace but compare the Stealth to a Mojo, how many jumps do you have on the Mojo?



Oopps. I was 100% NOT paying attention when I wrote that. Thanks, I did mean Ace. The Stealth performed very similar to my ACE. But I do have 4-5 jumps on a Mojo. But not enough to really compare it to the stealth. Not trying to promote the Stealth, ( I'm an ASYLUM/CR fan as you know ) but its a good canopy.


Quote

PS Your dad is the man




PS. Thanks, I'll let my Dad know you said Hi.

Take care Katie.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
How would you say the Stealth compares to the Ace in different winds, stability in super deep brakes, transition from a stall back to full flight, flare, heading performance (slider up/down), pressurization, any surging?

As far as clean pressurization (slider down) goes, how would you rank the Ace, Mojo and Stealth? Does the Stealth have vents?

Katie.

I had fun jumping with you guys over the Christmas break, hopefully we'll be back down later this year. (It's been raining for 22 days up here).


Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

How would you say the Stealth compares to the Ace in different winds, stability in super deep brakes, transition from a stall back to full flight, flare, heading performance (slider up/down), pressurization, any surging?
As far as clean pressurization (slider down) goes, how would you rank the Ace, Mojo and Stealth? Does the Stealth have vents?




Its flies fine in Deep Brakes / Seemed to be a little slow transitioning back to full flight from a stall, and I was having to let up a little sooner to return it into full flight before I landed. / Powerful flare from full flight, decent flare from half brakes / Heading performance was great slider down and off, only put 1 jump slider up jump and had a 90 left. ???? / Pressurization was fast and clean. The canopies overall weight seems to be a bit heavier, due to the top skin being 3 layers thick, with 1 of the layers being 1.5, but I havent noticed any difference in pressurization or heading performance due to this. I just know its built tough and didnt tear when I pulled it out of a tree that should have shredded it. It never scared me, and it always opened when I told it to. Just like my ACE. It is non-vented. I dont have much real experience with vented canopies yet, so I cant fairly compare it to a vented canopy, but I rank my ACE very high, and I would put the stealth very close to it. Again, this is all just my opinion on things, which doesn't mean much.
Sorry to hear about the rain. Chris.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It doesn't have 3 layers of top skin . We use 1.5 oz fabric for it's strength being that you only have one chute . It will hold it's flare longer through use since it won't wear out as easy as 0-3 fabric .
Joe

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ladies and Gents, Golowjoe or A.K.A." Joe B. ", helped make the canopy and helped with its initial test jumping. In fact, the canopy I've been jumping is his. So if you have any further Q's about it, he is a much better person to ask. B|B|



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Seemed to be a little slow transitioning back to full flight from a stall



Can you explain this a little more please? What was the quality of that transition?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It has a thicker or taller rib , which ever you prefer , than a regular 245 so that you can sink it better and gives it a better flare . This in turn makes it react a little slower but doesn't hurt the stability at all , just keeps it from flying off fast . Which I like next to guide wires or buildings .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Reply To
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Seemed to be a little slow transitioning back to full flight from a stall

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quote

Can you explain this a little more please? What was the quality of that transition?



With my ACE, when transitioning out of deep brakes and back into full flight, the canopy will quickly surge forward and rapidly gain speed back into full flight. With the Stealth, when I transitioned, it seemed to not surge as aggressively, and it was a little slower getting back into full flight speed. IT was smooth, just slower.



Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It'll only surge if you let up the toggle input too fast. Properly executed (and with a good BASE canopy) you can go from full flight, into a vertical stall, and ease back into full flight in a very controlled manner.

That's one thing I really like about the BlackJack. It's absolutely rock solid in super deep brakes. Most of the objects I jump at home have MANDATORY deep brake approaches. You have to be sure you can shut the canopy down, sink it into a hole, and then get enough forward speed to flare. With the BlackJack, you can even flare from 3/4 brakes and get some decent flare power.

To me, if that transition from full flight, to stall, back to full flight isn't smooth and easily controlled, then that is an undesirable quality in a BASE canopy for technical landing areas.

If you mostly land in fields and open areas, then don't worry about that so much.

I've found the ACE to have a very acceptable transition and the BlackJack is even better. As of right now, the Ace is the ONLY non-vented BASE canopy I will jump (unless I can get my hands on a Mojo...TOM;)). If it comes down to using a BlackJack/ACE or sitting out the jump, I'll do groundcrew.

I won't jump standard FOX canopies at all, and I think the Ace pressurizes as well as a vented FOX.

I don't have any experience on the Dagger , Rock Dragon, or Troll (other than observations of many jumps in the field) Jury is still out on the Flik, but for now, it seems like a canopy that is not well matched for the parameters I use to select a BASE canopy.





(Also, ACE/BlackJack canopies ability to rapidly generate speed or return to full flight is something you can definitely use to your advantage in certain situations.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0