Andy9o8

I hear Jesus Christ Himself is planning a Second Coming just to handle the fallout from this. Now that's serious. Naaa He is however, keeping track of those that make posts like yours here Does he know when I'm naughty and know when I'm nice?

I hear Jesus Christ Himself is planning a Second Coming just to handle the fallout from this. Now that's serious.

Arpaio is no different than any other shock jock. He'll go wherever he can find a forum. If you read the article, you'll see that Arpaio has enlisted AL citizens to act as nominal plaintiffs (proxies, essentially), since he, as a non-citizen of AL, does not have standing to sue in his own name (as you have pointed out).

...http://www.mrconservative.com... Good to see you back here again, you've been missed. Please keep the laughs coming and don't be a stranger. If he wasn't stranger, he'd be no fun.

..and mayhem. Clarity, please.

For the homeowner, it's not necessary to make that determination - all they need is standard homeowner's insurance that covers total loss. You have it on your house - it protects you against total loss from, e.g., fire, and it also protects you in case your neighbor's home explodes due to accidental causes, such as a gas explosion, and your house is damaged or destroyed by the incident, too. Now the insurance carrier might need to make that determination at the underwriting investigation level in order to set the premium to reflect the risk, but that's a different issue.

ROFL. There's the Supreme Court, and then there's the Alabama Supreme Court. There is the respected law enforcement community, and then there's Joe Arpaio. Now if you don't think people of ordinary sensibility understand the difference between those, especially on a chickenshit topic like this, then you grossly underestimate your audience. But I'm glad you're having fun fishin'.

Very generally speaking, issues of municipal planning, municipal expansion and/or land usage are regulated by zoning laws and ordinances. The existence and/or scope of such zoning regulation, as well as the nature and diligence of the enforcement of zoning regulation, tends to vary from one state to another, and often from one locality to another even within a state. Put very simply and broadly, it is up to state and local governments, by various means, to decide how expansive their zoning regulation will or will not be. Does this mean a stricter zoning regimen (and/or stricter enforcement thereof), and/or better municipal planning within Texas might have avoided some of the collateral damage from the West explosion? Hard to say without deeper analysis, but it probably merits looking at.

Actually, conversion to trunkified weight (a/k/a trunkification) is quite easy. As shown HERE, 1 trunk equals about 140 kg. So let's say you weigh 170 lbs. That converts to about 77 kg., or 0.55 trunk.

The only thing the homicide laws do is turn law-abiding citizens into criminals just because they happen to kill someone.

A meter is like...a yard, who knows what a kilogram is, my soda comes in liters, and why does the bank say it's 23 degrees out? I thought the Rule was 45 degrees.

In THIS THREAD you recently started, there's one post after another where you bitch about New York's approach to gun laws. Which begs the question: If you don't live in New York, why are you even commenting? Stupid question, eh? I see post after post where conservatives who live elsewhere bash New York,, Massachusetts, San Francisco, etc., etc. And you know what? that's OK. So is his commenting about Texas.

Was it an angry typo? woo hoo

You're not speaking rationally. Frankly, you never do, on this issue. Pity, really.

Your twisting of my words and meanings is lame. That aside, your response was expected.

$1 billion per each individual commercial policyholder? No. Considerable multi-millions? Yes, especially when considering multiple layers of what's called "excess insurance", and especially when stacking the cumulative insurance held by multiple parties involved in a major construction project. There are a number of prerequisites to getting a major construction project (a) under way, and (b) completed. Financing is only one of those things; adequate insurance coverage is another. Without the insurance in place, the project does not happen. Not all of this is pertinent to the West disaster, but I was answering your specific question.

I am unable to find the data at this point, but I believe that in terms of suicide *attempts*, women are much more likely. But their preferred methods (poisoning in particular) are much less likely to end in death than shooting (preferred by men). Your reply is offensive. This is the same worthless response given every time men's higher rate of suicide is brought up. Perhaps we should actually focus on why men kill themselves much more frequently instead of pointing out that women attempt suicide as a cry for help more often. You've proven my point that people only care about the emotional welfare of women even as men are dying in droves. That you disagree with his reply reflects upon the issue being discussed. That you find his response "offensive" reflects upon you. I say this not unmindful that there's another thread in which you just told Quade "You're so full of shit." Your frothing-at-the-mouth anger tends to overwhelm your posts and the messages you're trying to convey. A lot. I don't expect for an instant that you'll calm the fuck down because I say you really need to calm the fuck down; but dude, you really need to calm the fuck down. Who the fuck do I think I am to tell you that? Nobody in particular, really.

right...

Irrelevant. A layperson's anecdotal experience is no substitute for a qualified medical opinion. There should be a bot programmed into DZ.com to automatically say this.

The 75% of the country who are moderates are thoroughly impressed by comments just like that.

You're using the problem of Iraq/Afghanistan-era veteran suicide to take a partisan bash at Obama in this thread? That's pretty fucked up, Ron, even for you. But it doesn't merit a response on point. Maybe you need to hunker back down.

OK here's the score so far: Girl in No. Cal sez No. Cal. Dude in Colo. sez Colo. The Utahn sez Utah The other Coloradan dumps on Utah for its lack of debauchery The first Coloradan rubs it in. The guy with no location sez be a nomad Preacher from the Northwest sez Northwest (and that's the Gospel truth) -------------- No patterns here, guys.

http://www.jamesbondlifestyle.com/sites/default/files/styles/fancybox_popup/public/images/product/ga006-walther-ppk-collage.jpg

Yeh what's with the good spelling & grammar? Sockpuppet!!

http://wwwdelivery.superstock.com/WI/223/1491/PreviewComp/SuperStock_1491R-1114889.jpg