jakee

Perhaps you missed my post? Pajarito's link is based on a demonstrable lie. Why would the supporters of the flood be reduced to lying about it if they thought they had any kind of actual case? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

What the hell is an automatic knife? Seriously though, there is no danger of hook knives becoming illegal anywhere - not even in England! You couldn't even attack an 80 year old granny with one. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

It's well known that in prehistoric times, 4 - 5,000BC there were huge flood events in the mediterrenean basin and the near/ middle east. It is quite likely for the ancestral memory of these floods to have become an oral tradition of a world consuming flood. But that is as far as it goes. Any of the details of the biblical account are obviously a pure fiction, invented over the course of countless generations of re-telling. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

what happens when protest is outlawed? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

This case looks different to me. She just falled in love, but not married him yet, so the sin hasn't been commited. Uh, so consorting with a man outside of wedlock is not sinful? You didn't think that through did you? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Regardless of the sarcasm, that just isn't true. I know of no religion in which the murder of sinners, heretics or blasphemers saves the victim from hell - it just sends them there a little quicker and lets the murderers excercise a little righteous anger. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Depends what DZ you go to I guess. I know very few licenced jumpers who don't know how to pack. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Pahrais-ah Jeebus! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I don't use packers because I'd rather keep the money for more jump tickets, but if I did I'd be perfectly happy to let a teenager pack my rig. Lets face it, stuffing nylon into a bag isn't exactly rocket science Do you want to have an ideagasm?

And what language are you speaking right now? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Umm, what the hell dude? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Pirate day has been properly celebrated many a time in the old SC. Aaarrrgh May you feel the touch of His Noodly Appendage. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

But, if you were getting a right hand drive anyway then why wouldn't you just buy a Landrover! Do you want to have an ideagasm?

I did not know that! I had thought that the first raid was the vehicle attack on a Luftwaffe fighter airfield with truck mounted .50 Cals and thermite charges - turns out that the agreement with the LRDG to use their vehicles came about after the failure of the paratroop raid. Interesting history

I don't know what anyone else here thinks but the Sabre2 I tried has a lot higher front riser pressure than my current Sabre (both 150's). No question that the Sabre2 was more responsive in all inputs though. The Sabre2 also definitely opens quicker than the Safire2. I'd be amazed at a Safire2 actually taking 1200 feet to open though - leave the nose hanging out the front (obviously there's absolutely no need to even think about rolling the nose) and don't cover it with the slider. I actually do like having a fast opening canopy, but the Safire2 is just so much fun to fly that I would still get one if I could afford it. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

No dude, I'm wondering if a book that claims to be divinely inspired truth yet includes such a fucking stupid story as the Ark can be trusted to be accurate about anything else at all. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

That's the one I cited. It's a good one. One of the questions I asked directly references a flaw in the reasoning of that page. Mr Woodmorrappe uses the median size of Ark animals to prove that all the animals could fit into the ark. Quotations here. For this application of averages the median size is grossly misleading. The proper average to use is the mean size of the animals, which would be orders of magnitude larger. Not only does this mistake completely invalidate Woodmorrappe's entire study it also calls into question rips into fucking shreds any vestige of credibility the man possessed. This is such a basic mistake that it would be literally impossible for any scientist to make it, or for peer review and proof reading to miss it, without deliberate and malicious intent to deceive. Your entire Ark article is based on a lie. Not just a mistake, a deliberate lie intended to sound impressive and to deceive the ignorant and gullible. And baby, you have fallen for it hook line and sinker. So about my questions..... Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Intellectual boredom, really. He didn't present anything new. Yes, they are all old questions. The fact that none of them have ever been answered is rather telling don't you think? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Maybe a little canadian history would be useful here. Let me educate you. The monarchy here is symbolic only, has none of those characteristics I know well from the U.S., and this country by and large doesn't ... nah... forget it. You are quite right. I meant to address that response to Jakee but you got it instead. My bad. We have the same monarchy Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Oh I see. So simply because I point out that you cannot possibly know that Padilla is guilty of trying to build a nuclear device (a crime that he has never been charged with) simply because he was arrested and that accusation was given as one (of several) justifications..... then I must live in a world with no bad guys or anything in it? You are really with it today, aren't you? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Anyone can say that they understand something, demonstrating that understanding is a different thing. Lets examine - you stated that Padilla DID (your emphasis) conspire to plant a dirty bomb. I said prove it. You said "what makes you think the government can't prove it?" I said "You said he DID it, prove it." You said "The government must have enough evidence to prove it because they arrested him." So do you see that when you say that you are sure that Padilla DID it, and that you are sure that the government has enough evidence to prove his guilt "because they went to the trouble of arresting him" it makes it very difficult for me to believe that you do understand the standards of evidence? Finally, do you admit that when you said "Padilla DID it" that you were asserting something you could not possibly know? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Hehe, yeah. And y'know, sometimes we can all do with some perspective. Do you want to have an ideagasm?

Hah! "Padilla DID conspire with known terrorists to build and detonate a "dirty bomb" here in the U.S." "I, unlike you, have at least a moderate amount of faith in our government and trust that they have enough evidence to prove those charges." Anyway, do you now want to admit that when you said "Padilla DID conspire to build a dirty bomb" you were asserting something you couldn't possibly know? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

We've got a C-208B Grand caravan at our DZ. I've been in overloaded aircraft before but I don't see how it would be possible to physically fit 21 people in one - and as far as I can tell the cargomaster doesn't have a larger cabin? Do you want to have an ideagasm?

For the Politico's and the maths geeks Here Do you want to have an ideagasm?