LeeroyJenkins

Don’t dodge. Answer my question. Your question has to be based on a fact. It's not. There are no laws regarding collusion in the context of this discussion.. Good thing my question doesn’t have anything to do with the law. Here I will post it again below. See if you are capable of answering a question without spin or deflection. Why do you personally make the argument that collusion isn't a crime instead of making the argument the trump didn't collude?

Don’t dodge. Answer my question. We aren’t talking about obstruction right now.

And there is no law that regards collusion. What do you think about that? In your initial claim you stated the use of a private email server was illegal. That is all you stated. We aren't talking about classified information. We are only talking about the use of private email. When you acknowledge that the use of a private server is not illegal we can end that part of the conversation. How many times can you say there is no law that regards collusion without looking it up? Since you probably won't, collusion and conspiracy are basically synonyms and there are plenty of statutes against conspiracy. I can make it even easier for you. Paul Manafort colluded with Kilimnik to obstruct justice (Allegedly). Guess what he was charged with.. conspiracy to obstruct justice. I've got a question for you? Try not to spin or deflect and stay on topic. Why do you personally make the argument that collusion isn't a crime instead of making the argument the trump didn't collude?

I'm not sure if you actually believe that, or you are too stubborn to admit you are wrong. The classified aspect has absolutely nothing to do with you claiming that the use of a private email server is illegal.

Did my question to you have the term "Russian collusion" in it? You sad having a server is illegal, you then defended that statement by saying its illegal to delete emails. That is some great deflection. I'm not sure you are capable of having a intelligent discussion about politics. All Government email transactions are to be done on government servers. What she did was illegal. She also deleted subpoenaed emails that is also a legal related and unrelated I don't know you tell me? I'm not deflecting the damn thing you're trying to Cloud the issue that of the shit she did I'm not clouding anything. I am only pointing out your inaccuracies and poor use of deception and dodging. Lets see you answer some very easy questions. 1.Did Clinton use private email to conduct government work? yes 2.Was Clinton's simple use of a private email illegal? 3.Did Clinton delete emails? 4.Is deleting subpoenaed emails illegal? 5. Do any current Whitehouse advisers/officials use private email to conduct government work? 6. Is the use of private email to do government work illegal? That should do it. I'll format your next post to make it easy for you. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Here are my answers: 1.Answer: Yes 2.Answer: Yes 3.Answer: Yes 4.Answer: Yes 5.Answer: If they do they need to be charged 6.Answer: Yes Hilary also knowingly handled dispersed deleted top secret classified and special access information through her private server. Why didn't you list that? ------------------------------------------------------ I didn't mention classified information because it wasn't/isn't relevant to your claim about private email. Back to the questions. I will give you one thing, you're consistent. You're wrong, but you're consistent. There are members of the Trump administration that use private email. This is the case because the simple use of private email is not in itself illegal. It was nice to see you almost answer a question without trying to add spin or deflect. It would be a good reason to fire someone after the inspector general report came out. Relevant information, Comey was insubordinate for not coordinating with the Attorney General when he decided to notify Congress that he reopened the investigation.

Did my question to you have the term "Russian collusion" in it? You sad having a server is illegal, you then defended that statement by saying its illegal to delete emails. That is some great deflection. I'm not sure you are capable of having a intelligent discussion about politics. All Government email transactions are to be done on government servers. What she did was illegal. She also deleted subpoenaed emails that is also a legal related and unrelated I don't know you tell me? I'm not deflecting the damn thing you're trying to Cloud the issue that of the shit she did I'm not clouding anything. I am only pointing out your inaccuracies and poor use of deception and dodging. Lets see you answer some very easy questions. 1.Did Clinton use private email to conduct government work? 2.Was Clinton's simple use of a private email illegal? 3.Did Clinton delete emails? 4.Is deleting subpoenaed emails illegal? 5. Do any current Whitehouse advisers/officials use private email to conduct government work? 6. Is the use of private email to do government work illegal? That should do it. I'll format your next post to make it easy for you. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Here are my answers: 1.Answer: 2.Answer: 3.Answer: 4.Answer: 5.Answer: 6.Answer: ------------------------------------------------------

Did my question to you have the term "Russian collusion" in it? You sad having a server is illegal, you then defended that statement by saying its illegal to delete emails. That is some great deflection. I'm not sure you are capable of having a intelligent discussion about politics.

See everyone, there is no point in engaging with this guy. He can't answer straight questions. If he cant spin it or turn it into a talking point he cant answer. Lol I'm not playing your game dude! You still can't show any charges that are directly related to Russian collusion! I'll sit here and wait and see if he can but I know you can't. So thanks for the laugh you made my day! By the way, just so you know, there are no statutes in law that deal with collusion. Politically and maybe a Cutthroat but legally it's a nothingburger. Sorry to disappoint you! Nice attempted spin/deflection. Try reading my questions again. The legal term is conspiracy, there are plenty of statutes. Furthermore: Um... no, it isn't. Ohhh, nice attempt at deflection. Having a private email server =/= destroying emails. It really is interesting how you keep trying to deflect and misdirect everything, even though you are really bad at it.

See everyone, there is no point in engaging with this guy. He can't answer straight questions. If he cant spin it or turn it into a talking point he cant answer.

Well there's a couple of different definitions going on here Bill. First off, one definition of meddling is somehow Russia swung the election to Trump! But then you have the Obama definition that states that there's no way Russia could ever affect our elections. Even though it's been stated they've tried for decades or more! Which one do you believe? Then of course we have us election meddling, where Obama used State Department money to try and affect the election in Israel! What do you think of that one? Spin and twist Bill, spin and twist. Something we see here daily from the left! You still won't address my comments. I guess if you cant spin or twist it, dodge it. Okay. I have no idea what you're talking about. So, restate it and I'll take a look. Here you go: If charges are recommended/filed against more Trump campaign people/administration officials or even Trump himself, would you still believe the counter intelligence investigation had political motives? When you say you are confident there will be none, how do you rectify that with the fact that people in Trumps orbit have already been charged and plead guilty? Also let me understand your reasoning, you don't think any (more) charges will be brought because any evidence of criminal activity will be inadmissible due to how it was collected? Have you ever read Don Jr.'s Twitter feed? He confesses to some stuff on there that may interest you.

Well there's a couple of different definitions going on here Bill. First off, one definition of meddling is somehow Russia swung the election to Trump! But then you have the Obama definition that states that there's no way Russia could ever affect our elections. Even though it's been stated they've tried for decades or more! Which one do you believe? Then of course we have us election meddling, where Obama used State Department money to try and affect the election in Israel! What do you think of that one? Spin and twist Bill, spin and twist. Something we see here daily from the left! You still won't address my comments. I guess if you cant spin or twist it, dodge it.

Fair enough. I'm not 100% comfortable with the older style drawstrings on my Spectre for exactly that potential (though I've not seen it happen) and note that PD has since changed the design to be less likely to hang up. JW The only time I have seen snaps in person was on a PD Peregrine, which is for sub-terminal openings only.

I take it you are against canopies coming with tailgates attached to the slider? As for the person you replied to he is talking about controlling the slider, and which method would work best. I personally believe the snap method would be the best for skydiving.

The hangups to which I refer would be non-release or slow release. 1/2 my jumps are H&P's and usually below 3'k (nothing on BASE folks, but then I've always be a chickin-sh!t skydiver) In (mentally) comparing banding the slider to a 'C' attach point vs banding it (by use of an tacked-on tailgate) to the C/D/brake lines, it seems to me that either method would act to keep the slider up but that the canopy/lines spread would ensure that the tailgate disengages at that point. As to banding to the C attach point (Slider Control), has your experience been only with mesh sliders, or with solid (skydiving) sliders? Several have mentioned snaps, not familiar with where they're used... Can someone post video/manual/pics/links pointing to examples? Thanks, JW PS - I'm NOT set on one method or another, mostly trying to get/keep the discussion going for this off-label use. Found a nice video of the late Jessica Edgeington packing her comp vilo. it shows the snaps. https://youtu.be/wShSFIHa_LU?t=4m55s

I'm pretty sure this has been explained to you before, but let's try again. No one in their right mind thinks that this investigation is going to indicate that Russian interference swung the election. The crime is in TRYING. If members of the campaign were involved in that interference, they too have committed a crime. You should be outraged that a foreign power tried to fuck with your democratic processes, regardless of who got into the WH. The only collusion with evidence is in the Hillary camp. And now we've got multiple States suing the Hillary campaign because she took 84 million dollars away from their local campaigns. She also colluded to keep Bernie from getting the nomination. All that's known and irrefutable. And yet there's nothing about Russia and Trump. But you guys keep going like the ever-ready bunny! Got to love it You still haven't addressed my comment. I have another quested to add. Have you ever read Don Jr.'s Twitter feed? He confesses to some stuff on there that may interest you.

Sorry Bill That charge is related to the earlier supposed crimes! This is a tampering with witnesses crime. Again, related back to the earlier claims Muller is making. Really Bill You can do better than this?! You still never addressed my comment.

Does wings use larger PC size for the larger reserves?

I am a long time BASEr, BASE Instructor, Mentor and Rigger. In the context of your question, I think the knowledge that you are seeking is about "slider control". Check out this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nciajWdFd9c about "Direct slider control" and "Indirect slider control". Tailgates and the different versions of the slidergate are for reducing steeringlineovers. This is not a common problem slider up. I personally would not jump the slidergate shown in the OP video. There is a possibility of the modification getting caught in the cascades. I see that a common myth is reposted on this thread. That BASE canopies/pack jobs open faster (Snappy openings are part of BASE). A good packer can control the opening speed to a large extent. If one wants snappy openings, That is achievable. Same for comfortable openings or snivels. Getting to that level of packing skills can be a challenge but it is doable. If anyone wants to carry the discussion of Slider control or/and tailgates, I would be glad to impart my knowledge. Take care, space Great point. Direct slider control would be easier and work better in the skydiving environment.

thanks I have a freak 3 and a c3 so Im good on suits at the moment have fun with the medium big suits for now... well I take that back the NPS has my freak at the moment so I ordered a c3 and hopefully getting my freak back someday but money is tied with the ticket and new suit. Freak 3? Can I borrow your time machine?

Could you address my comment? Hahaha...you must be new here I'm pretty good at politics.

Could you address my comment?

I've been slammed by a specter on a H&P, it happens. I've thought about putting a different slider on my specter since I use it mostly for wing suiting. Maybe ill stick my base one on there with a tailgate and see how it works.

I would be interested in adding one of these to my main attached to the slider, but having never used one and not connected to the BASE community, I'm curious to know what unintended consequences users might be aware of... 1. Do they add to the snivel? 2. Has anyone gotten one that didn't release? 3. If you were looking over my shoulder when I'm stowing one where you'd say "wait a sec... you really don't want to do that... here, lemme show ya" 4. When would you never think of using it? (planned low hop-n-pop?) 5. What question did I miss? Tell me your stories please... JW I numbered your questions to make it easier. 1. No not really. Snappy openings are part of BASE. 2. People have gotten them that didn't release/took too long to release. This has only really been seen on slider off objects with static line or pilot chute assist. 3. No, unless you were rapping the rubber band 1,000,000 times. 4. I use mine on hop and pops when I take my BASE canopy out of the plane. 5. umm, how you would install it on a slider? I dono, ask your rigger. Tailgates are designed to control your control lines. The inner C-D lines and the break lines go inside the tailgate. I suggested it in the other thread as a way to prevent the slider from coming out before the canopy is expanding. In my opinion snaps would work better and be more simple.

Oh, I'm not actually an anti-trumper. I'm just way more in the middle than you. Masters in public administration (policy analysis). I give him credit when credit is due. When you say you are confident there will be none, how do you rectify that with the fact that people in Trumps orbit have already been charged and plead guilty? Also let me understand your reasoning, you don't think any (more) charges will be brought because any evidence of criminal activity will be inadmissible due to how it was collected?

If charges are recommended/filed against more Trump campaign people/administration officials or even Trump himself, would you still believe the counter intelligence investigation had political motives?