0
tetra316

Wide angle lense BRAND

Recommended Posts

I've been checking out some different wide angle lenses to buy and the prices seem anywhere from $25 for a Kenko lense to $160 for a royal lense and up. So what are some brands to stay away form due to fogging or 'black corners'? What brands do you recommend?

I tried a search but all I came up with was discussions on lenses sizes not brands.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Chances are, you're going to get what you pay for. I bought my first lens at BestBuy for ~$30. I definitely got a $30 lens. [:/]

My current lens is a Diamond .3x. It was pretty expensive, but the colors are brighter, picture is sharper, and there's no vignetting.

If I had it to do all over again, I would have just saved my money for the Diamond....

Just my 2cents
Jeff
Shhh... you hear that sound? That's the sound of nobody caring!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Thanks guys. I think I'll stay away from the Kenko. Anyone have experience with the Sony and royal lense, which one did you like better?



I've had both, and much prefer the Sony. Frankly, I wasn't impressed with the Royal (I had the .3). There was no vignetting, but the image was definitely distorted around the edges. The Sony is crystal clear, and I really like being able to use the infinity focal setting (which you can't with any of the single element lenses).

Canuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

What is the infinity focal setting?



It is a soft setting w/in the sony's camera settings which allow you to set the focus at infinity. This is useful in skydiving because most of the time the subjects are far enough away (and there is enough light) that the depth of field can have everyone in focus from around 5 ft to infinity which is usually just fine for skydiving operations.
Livin' on the Edge... sleeping with my rigger's wife...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

My current lens is a Diamond .3x. It was pretty expensive, but the colors are brighter, picture is sharper, and there's no vignetting.


ditto...

Vignetted footage on mixed (vignetted and non vignetted) video when you are editing....just looks lame....

The single element lenses (eg diamond) are also much less of a snag hazard than the much larger kenko/sony lenses.
I have seen a few of the larger lenses (kenko and sony ) being snagged /riser striked and damaging the attachment to the camera body
Not seen/heard of that on a low profile lens

no contest really...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote


Can someone explain what you guys mean by vignetting? I'm not up to speed with my camera terms :$

black corners/round on the picture. Can be cool.. sometimes. Not always.
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I really like being able to use the infinity focal setting (which you can't with any of the single element lenses).

Yes you can, you can't zoom much though. But my camera is ALWAYS on infinty, whichever lens I am using.
scissors beat paper, paper beat rock, rock beat wingsuit - KarlM

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

I really like being able to use the infinity focal setting (which you can't with any of the single element lenses).

Yes you can, you can't zoom much though. But my camera is ALWAYS on infinty, whichever lens I am using.



Looked like absolute shit when I tried it with my .3 lens - I would have had to been really drunk to think the image was in focus. You will also see that every manufacturer of single element lenses advises NOT to use the infinity setting.

Zoter - No argument that they are as close to snag proof as any lens comes. Mind you, I think my ringsight, still camera, etc. pose more of a threat than any lens.

Canuck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Zoter - No argument that they are as close to snag proof as any lens comes. Mind you, I think my ringsight, still camera, etc. pose more of a threat than any lens.

Canuck





I meant in terms of dealing with riser strikes and snags that dont cause any other problems......as said I have seen damage to the camera by the risers or something just catching the big lense and causing it to damage its attachment point on the cam........in one case that was suspected as the cause for taking the camera off an unprotected side mount helmet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

I think I'll stay away from the Kenko.




I think it just depends on how wide you want to go.

It's when you want to go really wide and not have black corners that you have to spend some money. I use a waycool .25 that's really nice, but it cost a couple hundred dollars.

For less wide lenses the cheaper ones seem to work fine for me. I use a kenko .5 for tandem videos and haven't had any problems. It's not low profile, but it cost about 1/10th of what the waycool lens did.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would go with waycool. I have flown both the royal and the way cool lenses and the way cool is better in my opinion. you can use the filter to protect the lense from scratches. once the filter is bad throw it out and buy a new one.

-Bowen
__________________________________________________
Retired Tunnel Instructor, Sky/Tunnel Coach

Former dealer for 2k Composites, Skysystems, Alti-2, Wings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

check ebay, seen some there. buy now $?
bhphotovideo.com mo $$
sony.com even mo $$$?

~



Ok, am I missing something, the sony .6 lense is $32 on ebay and $50 on the sony site. The royal is $159 and waycool about $140. Why is the sony so much cheaper than the royal lenses? Are the royal and waycool really that much better? I would have thought the sony ones to be more expensive. Or am I just paying more cuz their 'skydiving specific'?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0