0
Darius11

War with Syria

Recommended Posts

SkyDekker

Quote

My primary concern at this point is the international perspective on the US at this point.



Interesting. 10 years or so agaon, when that primary concern was raised the answer tended to be:

Fuck the rest of the world and what they think.



Perhaps, but there were rather a few of us who considered it to be insanity defined. You know, doing the same thing and expecting different results and all.

I know rather a few people on the high end of the IQ scale who did not think it through very well, for reasons I can only guess. When I ticked off a list of very serious negatives that were sure to come of our adventure in the sandbox, they came up with remarkably lame counters to my arguments.

I wish I had been wrong.

Actually, I wish we had seen fit to do most anything besides invading. Talk about leading with your chin...

After we 'liberated' Iraq, I was reminded of the finale of 'The Candidate,' in which the newly elected Senator (Robert Redford) turned to his campaign manager (Peter Boyle) and said "what do I do now?"

As Philip Seymour Hoffman's character noted at the end of 'Charlie Wilson's War,' "we fucked up the end game." Would that life did not so often imitate art.

Anyhow, there were rather a few of us that saw just what was coming when everyone was waving the flags, sounding the horns and beating the drums.

I wish I'd been wrong.


BSBD,

Winsor

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SkyDekker

Quote

My primary concern at this point is the international perspective on the US at this point.



Interesting. 10 years or so agaon, when that primary concern was raised the answer tended to be:

Fuck the rest of the world and what they think.



That's only because you want to revise history. 2 years after 911 the mood was very different.
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
U.S., Russia agree to framework on Syria chemical weapons
http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/14/politics/us-syria/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Under the resolution, progress on eliminating Syria's chemical weapons will be kept under review and, "in the event of non-compliance ... the UN Security Council should impose measures under Chapter VII of the UN Charter."
Chapter 7 of the U.N. charter leaves open the possibility for the Security Council to consider the use of force if Syria fails to comply, but Russia, which has veto power on the council, is unlikely to agree to that. Other options include the use of sanctions.


Hmmm...this sounds so familiar. Where have I heard this before?
Please don't dent the planet.

Destinations by Roxanne

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

U.N.: Syrian chemical attack 'unequivocally and objectively' confirmed
By Carol J. Williams
September 16, 2013, 10:34 a.m.
U.N. inspectors found "clear and convincing evidence" that sarin gas was used to attack rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital on Aug. 21 in violation of international law, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon reported Monday.

"This act is a war crime," Ban said in a statement to the U.N. Security Council accompanying the inspectors' report.



http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-syria-un-inspectors-chemical-weapons-confirmed-20130916,0,5441189.story

So, the folks who wanted independent UN confirmation -- there it is.
quade -
The World's Most Boring Skydiver

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade


not really. Your own citation:

"The inspectors were not tasked with determining which side used the banned chemical agents. Assad has denied the accusations that his forces deployed the poison gas, claiming it was done by the rebels to draw Western support to their side."

(Doesn't it seem silly not to have tasked them with this?)

And further down:
"Commission Chairman Paulo Sergio Pinheiro said investigators have found evidence of war crimes committed by both Assad's forces and rebel groups, but that accusations of crimes against humanity are likely to be leveled only at the Damascus government because the rebels lack "a clear chain of command.""

So really all the UN inspectors concluded is that we have bad people all around. Queue up the Russian veto in 5, 4, 3 .... (and the Chinese won't be far behind - 'we reserve the sovereign right to slaughter anything that moves within our territory')

And if the reason the rebels can be excused is the unclear chain of command, then I tend to agree with Putin. Is Bullshit!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
normiss

So long as veto power exists, the UN can really do nothing more than those big bad sanctions.



A more clear cut finding from the UN - might have made it difficult for Putin to explain away a veto. Right now he's got both the uncertainty of who did it, as well as the finding that both sides are guilty (which further supports the defense that it was all rebel scum).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon

>Why do you love the cold war?

Same reason I love grabbing guns - and same reason I hate kittens and children, I guess.




I could see hating kittens, but hating children for the same reason you want to grab guns? If guns kill a lot of kids why wouldn't you like guns?
See how easy slicing and dicing is...:)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon

>So long as veto power exists, the UN can really do nothing more than those big bad
>sanctions.

O the horror of limited government.



How many died due to chem weaps?

oh are you FOR that?

Oops , my bad>:(
I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama
BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
quade

Quote

U.N.: Syrian chemical attack 'unequivocally and objectively' confirmed
By Carol J. Williams
September 16, 2013, 10:34 a.m.
U.N. inspectors found "clear and convincing evidence" that sarin gas was used to attack rebel-held suburbs of the Syrian capital on Aug. 21 in violation of international law, U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon reported Monday.

"This act is a war crime," Ban said in a statement to the U.N. Security Council accompanying the inspectors' report.



http://www.latimes.com/world/worldnow/la-fg-wn-syria-un-inspectors-chemical-weapons-confirmed-20130916,0,5441189.story

So, the folks who wanted independent UN confirmation -- there it is.



Yep, that sarin was used but
They do not state WHO used it

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/2381bc86-1eba-11e3-b80b-00144feab7de.html#axzz2f9U0V2om
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
billvon



O the horror of limited government.



I wish you had the same sentiment about the US government
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0