CSpenceFLY 1 #1 January 6, 2013 I know where this is going to end up but please read and share it with everyone you know. Also don't let this take your eyes off of other issues. http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hjres15#overview ...of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #2 January 6, 2013 Absolutely zero chance of going anywhere. My guess is the guy who introduced it is currently being slapped around for being a dumbass.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 38 #3 January 6, 2013 You know better. 3.....2....1... Hi, everyone in (the other forum) lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #4 January 6, 2013 Quote You know better. 3.....2....1... Hi, everyone in (the other forum) You're going to have to be faster than that.quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 38 #5 January 6, 2013 I was plenty fast. I posted both of those in the BF My edit was, however, in SClisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
quade 3 #6 January 6, 2013 Still slower than me!quade - The World's Most Boring Skydiver Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oldwomanc6 38 #7 January 6, 2013 Well, not everyone has the lightning-fast reflexes of a snake! I tend to proofread, as well, dangit. lisa WSCR 594 FB 1023 CBDB 9 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #8 January 6, 2013 QuoteAbsolutely zero chance of going anywhere. My guess is the guy who introduced it is currently being slapped around for being a dumbass. Agreed. If anything, term limits are growing, not shrinking, in popularity. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #9 January 6, 2013 QuoteQuoteAbsolutely zero chance of going anywhere. My guess is the guy who introduced it is currently being slapped around for being a dumbass. Agreed. If anything, term limits are growing, not shrinking, in popularity. I think, Congressmen and Senators be limited to two terms. Maybe, that would avoid any of them getting too powerful. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #10 January 6, 2013 QuoteQuoteQuoteAbsolutely zero chance of going anywhere. My guess is the guy who introduced it is currently being slapped around for being a dumbass. Agreed. If anything, term limits are growing, not shrinking, in popularity. I think, Congressmen and Senators be limited to two terms. Maybe, that would avoid any of them getting too powerful. Chuck I used to be opposed to term limits for the legislative branch, but I've recently been coming around to the other side. Potential problem with too short a term limit is that you lose institutional memory and experience, plus the newbies will always be led around by the nose by the lobbyists. I agree w/2 terms for Senator = 12 years. I'd be ok w/4-term limit for Congressmen; that would be 8 years. (4 yrs just seems too short to me.) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Snowwhite 0 #11 January 6, 2013 Having spent some time with these people, it seems to me that one year of every term is spent doing absolutely nothing but running for the next term. We need to have 4 year terms for Congress with a limit of 2. Then they should have to live on Social Security and whatever pension they put away, or another job, like the rest of us do.skydiveTaylorville.org [email protected] Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #12 January 6, 2013 Anymore than that and they get like fish left on a counter too long... they start to smell! I think, after awhile, they tend to lose sight of their jobs and sell-out to lobbyista and become too self absorbed and tend to forget why they are there. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #13 January 6, 2013 QuoteHaving spent some time with these people, it seems to me that one year of every term is spent doing absolutely nothing but running for the next term. Truth be told, it's most of every year of every term. Most people would be shocked at the sheer quantity of time Senators and Congressmen spend, virtually every day, raising money for reelection. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Gravitymaster 0 #14 January 6, 2013 It is my Constitutional Right to elect whomever I want to represent me as many times as I want to elect them. Trampling on this right because you don't like embedded politicians is not the answer. Educating voters and more disclosures of financial trails and dealings is a better solution. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
masterrig 1 #15 January 6, 2013 I could go along with that but in reality, I don't see it happening. Chuck Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #16 January 6, 2013 QuoteIt is my Constitutional Right to elect whomever I want to represent me as many times as I want to elect them. Yes and no. The 22nd Amendment to the US Constitution sets the 2-term limit for President; and most states' constitutions set term limits for their respective governors. It would (IMPO) require an amendment of the US Constitution to set term limits for Congress. QuoteTrampling on this right because you don't like embedded politicians is not the answer. Educating voters and more disclosures of financial trails and dealings is a better solution. That's probably among the stronger arguments in opposition to term limits. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,260 #17 January 6, 2013 QuoteIt is my Constitutional Right to elect whomever I want to represent me as many times as I want to elect them. Trampling on this right because you don't like embedded politicians is not the answer. Educating voters and more disclosures of financial trails and dealings is a better solution. Except for the President.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
grimmie 177 #19 January 6, 2013 QuoteIt is my Constitutional Right to elect whomever I want to represent me as many times as I want to elect them. Trampling on this right because you don't like embedded politicians is not the answer. Educating voters and more disclosures of financial trails and dealings is a better solution. So you would be good with a four or five term Obama? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,651 #20 January 6, 2013 QuoteQuoteIt is my Constitutional Right to elect whomever I want to represent me as many times as I want to elect them. Trampling on this right because you don't like embedded politicians is not the answer. Educating voters and more disclosures of financial trails and dealings is a better solution. So you would be good with a four or five term Obama? If any recent Prez were to be allowed >2 terms I suspect the people's choice would be Clinton.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
regulator 0 #21 January 6, 2013 Id be more inclined to bring bill back than to live in a country ran by hillary. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rifleman 61 #22 January 7, 2013 Politicians are like diapers, they both need to be changed regularly and for exactly the same reason.Atheism is a Non-Prophet Organisation Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
popsjumper 2 #23 January 7, 2013 QuoteId be more inclined to bring bill back than to live in a country ran by hillary. ..or whatshisname currently screwing us. Saying his name leaves a bad taste in my mouth. Saying Clinton's name leaves a bad taste in Monica's mouth.My reality and yours are quite different. I think we're all Bozos on this bus. Falcon5232, SCS8170, SCSA353, POPS9398, DS239 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #24 January 7, 2013 QuotePoliticians are like diapers, they both need to be changed regularly and for exactly the same reason. To enrich the shareholders of Proctor & Gamble? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BIGUN 1,075 #25 January 7, 2013 The only amendment to Constitution I would like to see is one for a Balanced Budget. Balanced Budget "Acts" don't work worth a shit.Nobody has time to listen; because they're desperately chasing the need of being heard. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites