0
piisfish

massive shooting at Batman projection...

Recommended Posts

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote



It won't be our own troops used against us. It will be U.N. troops.




Oooh I so love conspiracy theories. Will they use nanothermite?


:D:D:D
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.



What IS the gun show loophole?
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

You keep talking about getting rid of what you describe as Assault Weapons, (Lets for the sake of argument just talk about the AR-15 he allegedly used). He also had a shotgun and a Glock, without doubt out of the three aforementioned weapons the shotgun would have done the most damage at close range in a packed theatre, are you suggesting that shotguns are banned?



No.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote



It won't be our own troops used against us. It will be U.N. troops.




Oooh I so love conspiracy theories. Will they use nanothermite?


:D:D:D



Laugh all you want. The UN or NATO will be our governments loophole to using military troops against us when the shit hits the fan. If the internet is still working I'll be sure to check in with you when it happens.

Also, the federal government is doing a great job of outfitting our local police agencies with all the military hardware they care to have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

The UN or NATO will be our governments loophole to using military troops against us when the shit hits the fan.



If, by "the shit hits the fan", you mean when some misguided citizens take an armed stand against the government, then the government needs no loophole. The Constitution already empowers the government to stop an insurrection. They don't need to rely on the UN or NATO.
Math tutoring available. Only $6! per hour! First lesson: Factorials!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.



What IS the gun show loophole?



Something that Iowa has been smart enough to close but 33 states haven't.

www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jun/27/tdmet02-law-enforcement-officials-back-closing-the-ar-2015984/
abcnews.go.com/WN/gun-show-loophole-closed/story?id=10404727#.UA2CFbSe4bw
...

The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this.



The theater banned CCW people from bringing in guns before this happened. Creating a disarmament zone where only those so inclined to not follow the law would have a weapon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Good job all those CCW holders were around to prevent this.



The theater banned CCW people from bringing in guns before this happened. Creating a disarmament zone where only those so inclined to not follow the law would have a weapon.



So the theater's law worked and prevented a bad situation from becoming far worse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

You keep talking about getting rid of what you describe as Assault Weapons, (Lets for the sake of argument just talk about the AR-15 he allegedly used). He also had a shotgun and a Glock, without doubt out of the three aforementioned weapons the shotgun would have done the most damage at close range in a packed theatre, are you suggesting that shotguns are banned?



No.



Why? A shotgun at close range in a crowd will do massive damage to human targets. So why the decision on one type of firearm used in a massacre compared to another?
When an author is too meticulous about his style, you may presume that his mind is frivolous and his content flimsy.
Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

You keep talking about getting rid of what you describe as Assault Weapons, (Lets for the sake of argument just talk about the AR-15 he allegedly used). He also had a shotgun and a Glock, without doubt out of the three aforementioned weapons the shotgun would have done the most damage at close range in a packed theatre, are you suggesting that shotguns are banned?



No.



Why? A shotgun at close range in a crowd will do massive damage to human targets. So why the decision on one type of firearm used in a massacre compared to another?



Where would YOU draw the line?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.



What IS the gun show loophole?



Something that Iowa has been smart enough to close but 33 states haven't.

www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jun/27/tdmet02-law-enforcement-officials-back-closing-the-ar-2015984/
abcnews.go.com/WN/gun-show-loophole-closed/story?id=10404727#.UA2CFbSe4bw



I can see no reason for the Gun Show sponsor not to have a back ground check system in place for the venue.

It can be policy that to make a purchase go to the back ground check booth and bring back the approval.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.



What IS the gun show loophole?



Something that Iowa has been smart enough to close but 33 states haven't.

www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jun/27/tdmet02-law-enforcement-officials-back-closing-the-ar-2015984/
abcnews.go.com/WN/gun-show-loophole-closed/story?id=10404727#.UA2CFbSe4bw



I can see no reason for the Gun Show sponsor not to have a back ground check system in place for the venue.

It can be policy that to make a purchase go to the back ground check booth and bring back the approval.

Matt

there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole

1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue

2 those wanting to fix the loopholes also want something added to the law that holds the show sponsors liable for any crime commited that can shown to be sold at the gun show they sponsored. Kind of like bloominburg wanting to hold gun manufactures liable for crimes commited with thier guns.

Again, the banners do now want to fix these because their ultimate goal is to end something THEY do not like, which is gunshows
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

Quote

>In much the same way that pedophilic Catholic priests are against sin.

No, more like the way many churches are against sin. Individual priests (and individual NRA members) may violate the law; that does not mean the organization supports them.



The NRA has consistently opposed quite reasonable measures (such as closing the gun show loophole) while all the time giving lip service to keeping guns away from felons.



What IS the gun show loophole?



Something that Iowa has been smart enough to close but 33 states haven't.

www2.timesdispatch.com/news/virginia-politics/2012/jun/27/tdmet02-law-enforcement-officials-back-closing-the-ar-2015984/
abcnews.go.com/WN/gun-show-loophole-closed/story?id=10404727#.UA2CFbSe4bw



I can see no reason for the Gun Show sponsor not to have a back ground check system in place for the venue.

It can be policy that to make a purchase go to the back ground check booth and bring back the approval.

Matt

there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole

1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue

2 those wanting to fix the loopholes also want something added to the law that holds the show sponsors liable for any crime commited that can shown to be sold at the gun show they sponsored. Kind of like bloominburg wanting to hold gun manufactures liable for crimes commited with thier guns.

Again, the banners do now want to fix these because their ultimate goal is to end something THEY do not like, which is gunshows



Aren't most guns purchased on weekends? Of adding a terminal at the show is an issue then have the potential buyers go to the local Gun Shop during the week and bring in the approval form.

Shops make a few bucks, no real excess on the system (they may feel a few last minute bumps on Friday's sure), checks done on a portion of weapons sold to help eliminate illegal purchases, every one keeps their Rights intact.

Matt
An Instructors first concern is student safety.
So, start being safe, first!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole

1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue
{/reply]

I thought it was all a computerized database? Do you mean it is not and there is not a staff person there for the gun show people to talk to? Or is the database so bad that they can't keep it running with a minimal IT support crew?

"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Quote

Quote

there are two major hold ups to fixing what is called the loophole

1 the NICS system runs on a small staff on weekends. Weekends are when most gun shows are held. Those wanting to fix the loopholes do not want to fix the NICS issue
{/reply]

I thought it was all a computerized database? Do you mean it is not and there is not a staff person there for the gun show people to talk to? Or is the database so bad that they can't keep it running with a minimal IT support crew?



It is

But I did not go far enough with the info

The NICS data base is only available to licenced sellers. Those wishing to sell privatley have no access to the system

The other issue it is crashes frequently
Not sure what level of IT support is needed to get past this
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
It is

But I did not go far enough with the info

The NICS data base is only available to licenced sellers. Those wishing to sell privatley have no access to the system

The other issue it is crashes frequently
Not sure what level of IT support is needed to get past this



OK, so presumably somebody running a gun show would be (or could be required to be) a licensed seller. I don't see any problem with having the background checks centralized?

Not too surprising the thing crashes frequently. What are the actual down time statistics on it? What do gun shops do then?
"What if there were no hypothetical questions?"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I like the system here in Iowa

You can go the sheriffs office and for $5 and three days get a permit to purchase . The Sherrif issues you the pemit after he does the background check

It is good for a year. You can go buy a gun in Iowa, show the permit to purchase and no NICS check is needed

Most private sellers ask for a valid permit to purchuse or carry license (which can be used as a permit to purchase) before selling to someone they dont know here in Iowa

But know this

NONE of this would have made any difference in the CO shooting

Everything he did was legal (as so far reported)


So going after the gun would do little if anything to stop this

The problem here is the person

The other sad thing here is gun banners (mostly liberals) think political solutions can be constructed for social problems. It will not work
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

0