Recommended Posts
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteGood for Florida!
Can a city, or even a state, restrict the BOR? I can understand regulation, but wouldn't restricting the 2nd be the same as restricting the 1st? or 3-9?
"Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."; Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the Heller decision.
Which has NOTHING to do with a state law pre-empting a city/county law.
Who said it did? It was an answer to "lost n confuzd"'s question: Can a city, or even a state, restrict the BOR?
The 2nd Amendment CAN be restricted, according to SCOTUS as articulated by Scalia.
Yeah? Ask Chicago how well they did in the McDonald case.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteGood for Florida!
Can a city, or even a state, restrict the BOR? I can understand regulation, but wouldn't restricting the 2nd be the same as restricting the 1st? or 3-9?
"Although we do not undertake an exhaustive historical analysis today of the full scope of the Second Amendment, nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."; Justice Antonin Scalia, writing for the majority in the Heller decision.
Which has NOTHING to do with a state law pre-empting a city/county law.
Who said it did? It was an answer to "lost n confuzd"'s question: Can a city, or even a state, restrict the BOR?
The 2nd Amendment CAN be restricted, according to SCOTUS as articulated by Scalia.
Yeah? Ask Chicago how well they did in the McDonald case.
Irrelevant to the point. The 2nd is not an unlimited right, as Scalia and the SCOTUS have clearly stated.
Quote"nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
Heller is irrelevant to the issue at hand in Florida, regardless of how many times you cut/paste it. Florida already has statutes that cover weapons in schools and gov't buildings.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
kallend 1,623
QuoteHeller is irrelevant to the issue at hand in Florida, regardless of how many times you cut/paste it. Florida already has statutes that cover weapons in schools and gov't buildings.
As I wrote previously, I was answering a specific question posed in this thread and that you have now CONVENIENTLY snipped, NOT referring to Florida. Take some reading lessons.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
kallend 1,623
Quote
The 2nd Amendment CAN be restricted, according to SCOTUS as articulated by Scalia.
And that restriction would be absolute if you had your way
So you think the entire population of the USA consists of convicted felons or loonies.
It may come as a surprise, but not everyone is like you.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteHeller is irrelevant to the issue at hand in Florida, regardless of how many times you cut/paste it. Florida already has statutes that cover weapons in schools and gov't buildings.
As I wrote previously, I was answering a specific question posed in this thread and that you have now CONVENIENTLY snipped, NOT referring to Florida. Take some reading lessons.
And your answer was incorrect, as shown by McDonald v. Chicago and my response above....regardless of how you bold it.
Take some legal lessons.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
kallend 1,623
QuoteQuoteQuoteHeller is irrelevant to the issue at hand in Florida, regardless of how many times you cut/paste it. Florida already has statutes that cover weapons in schools and gov't buildings.
As I wrote previously, I was answering a specific question posed in this thread and that you have now CONVENIENTLY snipped, NOT referring to Florida. Take some reading lessons.
And your answer was incorrect, as shown by McDonald v. Chicago and my response above....regardless of how you bold it.
Take some legal lessons.
Try taking a gun into Chicago's City Hall and see how you get on.
...
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one.
mnealtx 0
QuoteQuoteQuoteQuoteHeller is irrelevant to the issue at hand in Florida, regardless of how many times you cut/paste it. Florida already has statutes that cover weapons in schools and gov't buildings.
As I wrote previously, I was answering a specific question posed in this thread and that you have now CONVENIENTLY snipped, NOT referring to Florida. Take some reading lessons.
And your answer was incorrect, as shown by McDonald v. Chicago and my response above....regardless of how you bold it.
Take some legal lessons.
Try taking a gun into Chicago's City Hall and see how you get on.
Why would I? I'm sure IL state law prevents it, *just like FL law does*.
Mike
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
I love you, Shannon and Jim.
POPS 9708 , SCR 14706
rushmc 18
QuoteQuote
The 2nd Amendment CAN be restricted, according to SCOTUS as articulated by Scalia.
And that restriction would be absolute if you had your way
So you think the entire population of the USA consists of convicted felons or loonies.
It may come as a surprise, but not everyone is like you.
Another example of your dishonesty debating a topic
"America will never be destroyed from the outside,
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
if we falter and lose our freedoms,
it will be because we destroyed ourselves."
Abraham Lincoln
Ok, but not outright banned in entire cities. Had it been 5-4 the other way then that would be the case.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites