DrewEckhardt

Members
  • Content

    4,731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Feedback

    0%

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Gear

  • Main Canopy Size
    105
  • Main Canopy Other
    Javelin J7, Raven III reserve
  • Reserve Canopy Size
    143
  • Reserve Canopy Other
    Warlock, Dagger 244
  • AAD
    Cypres

Jump Profile

  • Home DZ
    formerly mile hi
  • License
    D
  • License Number
    28461
  • Licensing Organization
    USPA
  • Number of Jumps
    1500
  • Years in Sport
    12
  • First Choice Discipline
    Freeflying
  • First Choice Discipline Jump Total
    1200
  • Second Choice Discipline
    Swooping
  • Second Choice Discipline Jump Total
    1000

Ratings and Rigging

  • Pro Rating
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. DrewEckhardt

    Skysurfing checklist?

    MIchelle and Brian Germain told me you should be able to rotate both directions on all three axes while head-up: back flip, front flip, left cartwheel, right cartwheel, left turn, right turn starting and ending standing. Tamara Koyn's web page from 1994 is good: http://www.koyn.com/CloudDancer/articles/Surf.html Double wing sit suits providing more drag to stay on top of the board were common. You can have a channel sewn down the leg for the cutaway cable and velcro added for a pud. Some of us used to wear webbed swimming gloves to give our hands more input on our yaw axis. [QUOTE] A person or two said when it came out most people didn't even know how to free fly. They were belly jumpers who just threw it on and figured it out. [/QUOTE] Freestyle was fringe but well-established. Sit fly with double wing suits was not uncommon at the time. Head-down was a new thing kids were doing in Arizona and Florida.
  2. Many rigs fit airline permitted roll-aboards with a helmet around a top corner plus room for jump suit + extras. Most should fit with the main out of its pack tray if you can't get down to that size (I used to travel with a pair of 245 square foot base rigs in a carry-on). Larger rolling luggage is an option if you can't get down to that size with the main out of its pack tray. While you still don't want to deal with security and other issues dragging one everywhere, that makes necessary travel on foot more pleasant.
  3. DrewEckhardt

    Motorcycle + Rig?

    I used a Givi Maxia 50L top case on a rack for one rig / jumpsuit / helmet / etc, adding an airline legal carry-on on the passenger seat under a cargo net for a second.
  4. DrewEckhardt

    accuracy canopy

    Some BASE (Vertigo Dagger) and reserve (PD reserve) canopies fly more like contemporary skydiving mains and less like classic accuracy canopies. Without the ability to flare all the way I might stick with something more traditional which slows down horizontally and vertically with brake application and is more tolerant of not finishing a flare.
  5. DrewEckhardt

    accuracy canopy

    Some sort of accuracy/demo/BASE (not vented) 7-cell around 300 square feet with the brakes set short to allow a full flare. If using a BASE canopy have a sail slider made to make the openings pleasant. Below 1000 feet at terminal you want them to be speedy, but at skydiving pull altitudes you have plenty of time.
  6. DrewEckhardt

    accuracy canopy

    ***You're both right about accuracy canopies, though I wouldn't consider accuracy landings to be "good", rather they're acceptably shitty and it's your job to hit the soft target :). [/QUOTE] They can be great, even atop big boulders where you need to run to the front edge to keep your pilot chute out of the river (Don't get down-wind of a tight landing area when no place looks like a suitable alternative). Unlike more modern shapes which flatten out with a little brake and maintain a similar glide until just short of stalling, more toggle steepens the approach (even with no wind) from about 2:1 in full flight to straight down in a full sink. Normally you fly your approach at a 1:1 glide ratio using 2/3 brakes. Transition to a full sink high above a target and you won't have any lift left to provide a soft landing without padding from pea gravel or an inflated tuffet. Don't finish your approach with more than 3/4 brakes and there's enough flare to land softly. [QUOTE] But my impression was that demostalker1 was not asking for a classic accuracy canopy, but rather hijacking the original thread to ask about a canopy that will land softly in general tight spaces that aren't accuracy tuffets with limited brake range (I'm guessing for demos maybe? Or maybe just a very small LZ). For which a Parafoil is not necessarily the answer. But I might be wrong of course. [/QUOTE] Some form of accuracy/demo/BASE canopy with life left (a $100 1000 jump F111 car cover won't work) loaded around 0.7 pounds per square foot is the right tool for that application. With experience and consistent winds you can get frisbee-disc accuracy out of a sport canopy stopping within a step or two with full-flight or accelerated approaches, even at higher (~1.8 pounds/square feet, 8000 feet density altitude) wing loadings. Unfortunately, a 5 MPH wind change for 10 seconds of final approach is a 70 foot change in where you'll be landing with a contemporary sport canopy appoach. The huge range in glide with accuracy or BASE canopies means that's not an issue. It gives you a lot more latitude in approach precision - you don't need to be at a particular spot 1000' off the ground.
  7. DrewEckhardt

    accuracy canopy

    Parachutes shaped (thick airfoil) and sized (0.7 pounds/square feet) for classic accuracy approaches land great on hard ground (you can use a big boulder instead of a tuffet) from about 3/4 brakes although you sacrifice pin-point accuracy by not finishing with a sink to a controlled crash landing.
  8. DrewEckhardt

    Sabre 1 150 vs Sabre 2 150

    Everything except the name.
  9. DrewEckhardt

    S-turns on final

    It's dangerous because it makes you unpredictable and could lead to a canopy collision. Not planned situations. At drop zones you don't need to be that accurate. In tighter landing areas you're prudently jumping a rectangular seven-cell canopy and can adjust the glide ratio with brakes for much better accuracy than you could achieve with S-turns. When you screw up and land out you might need to.
  10. DrewEckhardt

    Power Tool - Yes or No?

    No. The thin piece of spectra makes it harder to get the closing pin in than a pull-up cord, and decent technique closing each flap means tension on the pull up cord isn't high enough to require a better grip from a handle.
  11. DrewEckhardt

    Wire rope / cutaway cable cutters

    Felco. http://www.amazon.com/Loos-Cableware-Felco-Cable-Cutter/dp/B0038YY3QC
  12. DrewEckhardt

    Low jumpers and Stiletos

    The Stiletto was introduced with a 1.3 pounds/square foot placarded maximum, lthe Sabre 1.0, and non-students were still adapting from the pound per square foot limit which was prudent on aging F111 canopies. People were evenly split on whether I should jump a 190 or 210 for my first canopy although I only weighed 150 pounds, with the F111 9-cell PD190 the preferred canopy choice. A 190 allows a slightly large 220 pound guy to stay within the upper limit, or a 165 pound jumper the 1.0 lower recommendation. Yes. They're more responsive to toggle input than rectangular canopies which can be enjoyable. Approaching the original wing loading limit the reduced stall speed is nicer at high elevations on hot summer days. Those are reasons every modern skydiving canopy has a tapered or elliptical shape, called "semi-elliptical" for marketing purposes to indicate less aggressive performance. .
  13. DrewEckhardt

    main closing loop break

    I manipulate the closing pin and pull-up cord so that the pull-up cord is beneath the metal pin and rubbing against it not the loop as I remove it.
  14. DrewEckhardt

    Low jumpers and Stiletos

    Yes. The Stiletto is the most responsive canopy PD ever built. PD made all of the following canopies (Velocity, Katana) less sensitive to toggle input because John LeBlanc observed jumpers having problems with roll axis stability when landing their Stilettos. Small control inputs will quickly put the canopy into a steep dive that is not recoverable at low altitudes whether or not that's what you intend. Here's a Stiletto 150 fatality with just a 1.2 wing loading and 480 jumps: http://www.dropzone.com/cgi-bin/forum/gforum.cgi?post=3709212 The control sensitivity (especially with the brakes stowed) also makes the Stiletto more likely to spin up if you don't stay level during opening and deal with any problems immediately. No, because landing safely in a straight line doesn't predict a good landing when things go wrong like low turns to avoid unseen obstacles.
  15. DrewEckhardt

    main and reserve size

    No. Your main should be sized to land you anywhere when things are going well - you're not unconscious, not suffering from a concussion, did not dislocate your shoulder, did not break your leg, and eyes are not covered in blood from a scalp wound (I've seen all of those happen on exit or in freefall). Your reserve should be sized to land you safely under any condition. Early in your skydiving career the two should be the same size, although later the limit past which it's imprudent to down-size comes first with your reserve. For instance, I have a 105 main and 143 reserve. If I was current and jumping a cross-braced canopy a 95-97 would be fine, although an even bigger reserve would be most prudent. Single canopy reserve rides are much more common and less preventable than two-out situations and therefore the situation you want to optimize for.