SpeedRacer 1 #1 November 1, 2010 http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=164200733600162 Enjoy! Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #2 November 1, 2010 Then she shouldn't celebrate Christmas because that too is a Pagan holiday. B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #3 November 1, 2010 libs pleasure themselves to O'donnell...http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/10/libs-keep-it-classy-at-dc-rally-i.html Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rushmc 18 #4 November 1, 2010 Quote libs pleasure tmemselves to O'donnell... http://jammiewearingfool.blogspot.com/2010/10/libs-keep-it-classy-at-dc-rally-i.html Such a classy bunch of bananas "America will never be destroyed from the outside, if we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves." Abraham Lincoln Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #5 November 2, 2010 I dislike the 9/11 "truthers" just as much as the next guy, but saying it is synonymous with liberalism is like saying all conservatives are creationists.B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #6 November 2, 2010 Quote I dislike the 9/11 "truthers" just as much as the next guy, but saying it is synonymous with liberalism is like saying all conservatives are creationists. More like frogs and toads. All toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
skipbelt 0 #7 November 2, 2010 all frogs are potential princes ! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,126 #8 November 2, 2010 QuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads.What makes you say that? Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #9 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads.What makes you say that? Wendy P. [Church Lady]Satan.[/CL] the same thing that makes me say that all mushrooms are fungus, while not all fungus are mushrooms.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #10 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote I dislike the 9/11 "truthers" just as much as the next guy, but saying it is synonymous with liberalism is like saying all conservatives are creationists. More like frogs and toads. All toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads. Or all humans are primates but not all primates are humans.B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #11 November 2, 2010 QuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads. Actually no. Taxonomically, both frogs and toads inhabit the Anura order; and neither frogs nor toads are properly considered suborders of the other. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 24 #12 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads. Actually no. Taxonomically, both frogs and toads inhabit the Anura order; and neither frogs nor toads are properly considered suborders of the other. There you go with your science "facts" again.Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,126 #13 November 2, 2010 Yep. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Prior23 0 #14 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads. Actually no. Taxonomically, both frogs and toads inhabit the Anura order; and neither frogs nor toads are properly considered suborders of the other. Have you heard of the family "Bufonidae"?B.A.S.E. #1734 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,126 #15 November 2, 2010 Anura is the order Suborders are Archaeobatrachia (primitive frogs and toads) Mesobatrachia (not-so-primitive) Neobatrachia (most advanced): They have over 96% of frogs and toads. The families are under the orders; the vast majority of the families have either frogs or toads, not both. The biggest frog family is ranidae; the biggest toad family is bufonidae. So it's quite accurate to say that they seem to have evolved from common ancestors, but they're not members of the same family. Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #16 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteQuoteAll toads are frogs, but not all frogs are toads. Actually no. Taxonomically, both frogs and toads inhabit the Anura order; and neither frogs nor toads are properly considered suborders of the other. Have you heard of the family "Bufonidae"? Yes. They are a subset of the Anura order. While many family subsets of Anura contain both frogs and toads, Bufonidae are the only family of Anurans all members of which are known as "toads." Nonetheless, Bufonidae are not a subset of any frogs, nor are any frogs a subset of Bufonidae. ETA: Never insult the Bufonidae family in Jersey, or you'll wind up sleeping with the fishes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Andy9o8 0 #17 November 2, 2010 QuoteNeobatrachia (most advanced) They're also the most arrogant. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #18 November 2, 2010 QuoteQuoteNeobatrachia (most advanced) They're also the most arrogant. Oh, they are conservatives.I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SpeedRacer 1 #19 November 2, 2010 At least someone is finally speaking out against all those human sacrifices on Halloween. It sucks cleaning up afterwards. Speed Racer -------------------------------------------------- Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
SkyDekker 1,129 #20 November 2, 2010 Quote the same thing that makes me say that all mushrooms are fungus, while not all fungus are mushrooms. Fungi Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,126 #21 November 2, 2010 My grammar can beat up your grammar Wendy P.There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,404 #22 November 2, 2010 >My grammar can beat up your grammar Oh yeah? Well, my grampar can beat up your grammar. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
wmw999 2,126 #23 November 2, 2010 Grammar was always kind of kinky -- she'd probably like that Wendy P. There is nothing more dangerous than breaking a basic safety rule and getting away with it. It removes fear of the consequences and builds false confidence. (tbrown) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
headoverheels 291 #24 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote the same thing that makes me say that all mushrooms are fungus, while not all fungus are mushrooms. Fungi Maybe you think he's a fun guy... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Remster 24 #25 November 2, 2010 Quote Quote Quote the same thing that makes me say that all mushrooms are fungus, while not all fungus are mushrooms. Fungi Maybe you think he's a fun guy... Remster Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
