Recommended Posts
skybytch 259
QuoteWould you?
Yes. I like to think for myself instead of letting others think for me.
Hooknswoop 19
If someone isn’t all that knowledgeable about gear, they should listen to an expert, a rigger. Same way an inexperienced canopy pilot should listen to an Instructor about what canopy and size they should buy and how they should fly it.
No reason to re-invent the wheel again.
Derek
No reason to re-invent the wheel again.
Derek
tbrown 26
I know Tempos are crap***
I don't know a whole lot about Tempos, but I do personally know Sparky, and if he jumps a Tempo they can't be crap or he wouldn't jump one.
The Tempo was built by PISA, which is now part of Aerodyne. The Tempo, as well as Aerodyne's Amigo reserve, were both discontinued and replaced by the Smart reserve. I would imagine that the Smart probably incorporates advances in design and construction over both the Amigo and the Tempo, or at least I'd certainly expect it to. I have also heard, from Tempo owners, that there were some design and construction changes made in the Tempo in 2001 to make them stronger for high speed deployments. You might want to look into that regarding any Tempo that you own. But I've only heard of Tempos having a good track record for saving their owners' lives and haven't heard of any catastrophic failures. So, while the Tempo is a discontinued canopy, and while the construction may have been improved after 2001, I wouldn't call them crap by any means - nor any Raven either. They've both saved a lot of lives, even if their design or construction isn't as good as a PD or a Smart.
Your humble servant.....Professor Gravity !
skybytch 259
QuoteAerodyne's Amigo reserve
The Amigo isn't an Aerodyne product, it's a Freeflight Enterprises product. And AFAIK, it is still available new.
NickDG 23
I think it’s important to note (for the newer jumpers) that while many square reserves have suffered damage during deployment I recall only one jumper killed in this fashion.
I've forgotten his name, and the exact circumstances, but it was at Elsinore, some years ago. He was a rather large fellow getting re-current on brand new gear that was way too small for him.
The chance a correctly sized square reserve that has passed a rigger's inspection suffering a catastrophic failure (one that kills you), during a normal deployment, is too low to worry about.
NickD BASE 194
I've forgotten his name, and the exact circumstances, but it was at Elsinore, some years ago. He was a rather large fellow getting re-current on brand new gear that was way too small for him.
The chance a correctly sized square reserve that has passed a rigger's inspection suffering a catastrophic failure (one that kills you), during a normal deployment, is too low to worry about.
NickD BASE 194
I see you're a rigger and you jump a PD reserve like me. Funny that. I paid a lot more for it than a Tempo (which was available at the time), so accusing me of "not doing my own thinking" is a bit harsh (maybe you didn't intend it that way, in which case my apologies).
I was making the point; if your rigger's opinion is that something is sub-standard, whether or not you agree with him/her, going out and buying that component and expecting them to maintain it is a bit of an insult. Just my opinion, but you do see my point, right?
I guess the other option is to leave your rigger out of the loop totally, but I figured they might know a thing or two about gear and used that (free) information in making my decision (and by the way, he didn't tell me "buy a PD", I decided that myself and he didn't discourage me). Just to set the record straight.
I was making the point; if your rigger's opinion is that something is sub-standard, whether or not you agree with him/her, going out and buying that component and expecting them to maintain it is a bit of an insult. Just my opinion, but you do see my point, right?
I guess the other option is to leave your rigger out of the loop totally, but I figured they might know a thing or two about gear and used that (free) information in making my decision (and by the way, he didn't tell me "buy a PD", I decided that myself and he didn't discourage me). Just to set the record straight.
airdvr 200
OK...so my Raven was made prior to those that had the problem. Here's the thing...I've got it loaded about 1.3. This isn't giving me a warm fuzzy.
Please don't dent the planet.
Destinations by Roxanne
Destinations by Roxanne
hookitt 0
All the rides I've taken on a Raven are with that same wingloading and higher.
If you do end up under it, test flare it several times because the control range is fairly short. Fly the canopy like it wants you to, not how you want to fly it.
If you just cram on the brakes when you get close to the ground, as some people do, it will stall.
If you do end up under it, test flare it several times because the control range is fairly short. Fly the canopy like it wants you to, not how you want to fly it.
If you just cram on the brakes when you get close to the ground, as some people do, it will stall.
My grammar sometimes resembles that of magnetic refrigerator poetry... Ghetto
QuoteI know Tempos are crap
Based on what? DZ.com BS?
Tempos are fine reseves as long as you do not overload them pass The MAX SUSP WEIGHT like many do and then they bitch about it. Go figure.
I flew a Tempo 150 and I was impressed by the performence. Several at my DZ have flown Tempos and they all liked the way they flew and landed. None were overloaded. Some cannot say the same about Micro Ravens...
I have two Tempos 150 @ 1.15. I cannot say a single bad thing about them.
I agree that Tempos don't have the reinforcements that PDRs have. Keep in mind that the max exit weight of the Tempo 150 is much lower than the one for a PDR 143 (254 LBS).
As long as you stay within PISA's limits you're fine.
I would not jump a Tempo or any other reserve over the max susp weight.
Memento Audere Semper
903
903
Same goes with a main, a container, a pilot chute or an AAD.
Share this post
Link to post
Share on other sites