regulator

You think I could fit you on a hook?

Neither does your statement. She's a professional. She was saying fox news contributor mike huckaby. And she minced two words together. If you can't see through your hatred for fox news then perhaps you should take off those rose colored glasses.

Yeah, right. She probably practiced in front of a mirror. And today, she's getting almost as much press as Kim Kardashian's rather oddly-proportioned bare ass. Just like you practicing banning someone?

So we have one president who lied to get health care to more americans. We have the preceding president who lied to go to war and kill thousands of Americans. You have made it clear which one you support. Indeedexcept you are lying about bush but you should have posted this to kallend Denial is not just a river in Africa, Marc. Bush, Powell, Rice, Cheney and Rumsfeld all lied. Then we have Reagan who sold arms to Iran and lied about it, who armed the Contras and lied about it, who armed Osama bin Laden, and who raised the national debt by 181%, and the right considers him a hero. Name one politician that doesn't lie. How about the next election some rep from either party gets elected is the more truthful candidate. Of course if dems promote Hillary you're already screwed. I wouldnt believe a single word she says.

You deport the whole family and blame it on a paperwork issue.

Me too 😉

When I voted today I accidentally left my dl in my car. I gave them my chl instead and they found my name with no issues. Didn't see anything about phones but mine was in my pocket.

I cast my ballot and I hope the people I possibly helped get elected not only not take their job for granted, but actually DO something for the good of Texas and America.

Ironically enough that's the exact same advice my mom gave me last night.

Tomorrow we as citizens get to cast our vote to get candidates that represent our values. No matter who you vote for, have a good voting day and make your voice heard!

Yes in this situation its exactly what you do. Then you find an actual case of police abuse, shooting, etc, and you fire up your media machine on them. Dont start your political war machine on this cop once he is proven innocent by the grand jury, and the fed investigation... You and Rush are the only ones talking about the cop and something being done to him. if he did nothing wrong, perfect. Get him back to work. However, I think that what transpired shows there are some underlying issues that should get worked on. If you don't, this will just happen again. Or you can both stick your heads in the sand and believe this only happene because of "race baiters" and "race industry". You and I both know that man can never return to police work in the state of Missouri much less Ferguson.

The thing is...police forces are comprised of human beings. A vast majority of these human beings are at least receptive about their role in the community and try doing their jobs. Sure there's a cross section of assholes...just like you would find in any other job and there are also a section of people who are just having a bad day and return to non-asshole status after their bad day has expired. Yes I'm sure there are some that are evil and should be removed for every experience I've had with police...meaning I get pulled over...I wait until they walk up to my car window...I tell them I wasnt going to move until they could see my actions...I politely give him my drivers license...then CHL. I then instruct the officer I am going to reach for my glove box. I am always polite and even when I carry my sidearm [which is in a locked box in my car] I have never had any bad experiences in the past 20 years. Yes I have had bad experiences before this time but I was also young and out at 4 am. I don't get in situations like that anymore and subsequently the rate of running into asshole cops has also declined significantly as well. It shouldn't be too hard to figure out. If you are abiding by the law...and polite to the LEO the likelihood of you running into an asshole cop should be significantly diminished.

Why do you hate the transition to fall? Usually better weed is being harvested during the fall around here. Of course its still 75 degrees during the days.

Once deadly force is required shoot until the threat is eliminated.

http://www.youngcons.com/man-tries-voting-for-republican-on-electronic-voting-machine-films-what-happens-is-flabbergasted/

What the black community needs more of people like Dr. Ben Carson and much less of al sharpton, jesse jackson and eric holder.

Here's an idea Michael Brown should have stuck with. Stop robbing stores and assaulting cops and you might have lived another day: End of story.

Thank you. I think it should be well known to race baiters and the like that if you attack a police officer unarmed or not and attempt to retrieve his firearm by force then you deserve to be shot.

Justice Department investigators have all but concluded they do not have a strong enough case to bring civil rights charges against Darren Wilson, the white police officer who shot and killed an unarmed black teenager in Ferguson, Mo., law enforcement officials said. When racial tension boiled over in Ferguson after the Aug. 9 shooting, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. traveled to the St. Louis suburb to meet with city leaders and protest organizers in an effort to bring calm. He assured them that the federal government would open a civil rights investigation into the fatal shooting of Michael Brown. But that investigation now seems unlikely to result in any charges. “The evidence at this point does not support civil rights charges against Officer Wilson,” said one person briefed on the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the case. Justice Department officials are loath to acknowledge publicly that their case cannot now meet the high legal threshold for a successful civil rights prosecution. The timing is sensitive: Tensions are high in greater St. Louis as people await the results of a grand jury’s review of the case. Many supporters of Brown say they are already convinced there will be no state-level indictment of the officer. Federal officials have wanted to show that they are conducting a full and fair review of the case. Justice spokesman Brian Fallon said the case remains open and any discussion of its results is premature. “This is an irresponsible report by The Washington Post that is based on idle speculation,” Fallon said in a statement. Other law enforcement officials interviewed by The Post said it was not too soon to say how the investigation would end. “The evidence we have makes federal civil rights charges unlikely,” one said. A lawyer for Brown’s family, Benjamin L. Crump, said he would not comment “on something that is not official.” James P. Towey Jr., Wilson’s attorney, did not return calls or e-mails seeking comment. The Justice Department is continuing its broad investigation of the policing practices of the Ferguson Police Department, which could result in wholesale reforms and reorganization. The Justice Department on Friday announced an agreement with the city of Albuquerque intended to overhaul the way its police department uses force, the result of one such civil rights investigation. At a forum this week organized by the Aspen Institute and the Atlantic magazine, Holder indicated that a similar overhaul could be called for in Ferguson.“It’s pretty clear that the need for wholesale change in that department is appropriate,” Holder said. Federal law sets a high bar in bringing civil rights charges against a police officer because prosecutors must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer intended to violate someone’s constitutional rights. Authorities faced a similar challenge in the investigation of George Zimmerman in the 2012 shooting death of unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin in Sanford, Fla. Under federal law for hate crimes, prosecutors have to show that someone has been victimized intentionally because of a racial or other bias. Law enforcement officials have said privately that there is insufficient evidence to bring federal charges in that case, although the two-year probe technically remains open. The investigation of the Brown shooting is being conducted by the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division under a federal statute that makes it a crime for a person with government authority — the legal term is “acting under color of any law” — to “willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.” Sometimes the department is successful. In 2010, prosecutors won convictions of two New Orleans police officers for civil rights violations in connection with the killing of a man and the burning of his body during the disruption that followed Hurricane Katrina. The officers have appealed their convictions. Holder and other officials have decried recent news reports about investigative findings in the Ferguson case that have revealed new but conflicting details about the three-minute encounter between Wilson and Brown. Some of those details potentially corroborate the officer’s account that the killing was an act of self-defense and could complicate a civil rights case against Wilson. The St. Louis County autopsy report, published Oct. 21 by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, was interpreted by some forensic pathologists as indicating that Brown may have struggled for control of Wilson’s gun during their initial altercation, but they also said the evidence was inconclusive. After two shots were fired inside Wilson’s patrol vehicle, the officer got out and Brown fled but later turned around as Wilson continued firing. Some pathologists said the report indicates — but not conclusively — that Brown’s hands were not over his head. Several witnesses said his arms were raised in surrender when the officer shot him again. Rachel A. Harmon, a law professor at the University of Virginia and a former prosecutor in the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, said it is especially challenging to prove a civil rights case beyond a reasonable doubt. “There is an extra burden in federal civil rights cases because the statute requires that the defendant acted ‘willfully,’ ” Harmon said. “It is not enough to prove that he used too much force. You have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he did so willfully.” Harmon also said that if Wilson “genuinely believed he was acting in self-defense,” then his actions are not considered “willful,” meaning he did not intend to deprive Brown of his constitutional rights. Brown was shot a total of nine times, including three times in the head, according to the county autopsy. Dorian Johnson, the 22-year-old who was with Brown when the two encountered Wilson, has said the officer was the aggressor and did not act in self defense. David Klinger, a former Los Angeles police officer and now a professor of criminology at the University of Missouri at St. Louis, said enduring disputes over what happened likely raise reasonable doubt that would make a successful civil rights prosecution almost impossible. “The autopsy report is devastating because it raises doubts about him standing still with his hands in the air in surrender,” said Klinger, who shot and killed a suspect in the line of duty when he was an officer. “If you have a halfway competent lawyer, the defense could raise reasonable doubt with this.” Samuel Bagenstos, a former Justice Department principal deputy assistant attorney general for civil rights and now a law professor at the University of Michigan, said the obstacles prosecutors face in the Ferguson case are typical, as are the frustrations of Brown’s supporters. It is common to have a situation “that looks like a constitutional violation and may well be an injustice,” Bagenstos said. “But sometimes the Justice Department does not have the ability to bring a civil rights case under the statutes it enforces.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/federal-civil-rights-charges-unlikely-against-police-officer-in-ferguson-shooting/2014/10/31/56189d80-6055-11e4-8b9e-2ccdac31a031_story.html

Here's what you said: 'Thx God, not all North Americans are hillybilly' I'm quite sure there are just a mixed sort of germans that could foot tbe bill of being a 'hillbilly'. It's like calling someone a racist simply because you disagree with someone who has once been offended.

Just exactly what are you trying to insinuate?

This picture draws a lot of parallels to the left.

Or do they?

And thank god not all germans commit incest. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/germany/11119062/Incest-a-fundamental-right-German-committee-says.html

http://joeforamerica.com/2014/10/breaking-obama-administration-officials-convicted-voter-fraud/