KevinMcGuire

lunch

Lets not forget that China was the country that stole our guidance system and in doing so, increased their nuke delivery capabilty 10 fold virtually over night and did so under Clintons watch. NK's desire to build nukes was brought to the attention of the clinton administration and Clinton, being the pussy he is, did nothing about it. He preferd to stick his head in the sand. In additon to that, he did nothing about the three offers from Sudan to give OBL to the U.S. That's two very distinct mistakes on Clintons part and HE is directly responsible for much of what is happening in the world today. One could say that GWB was left with a rather shity mess to clean up after clinton. Looking back at clintons terms, it seems that he was terrified of getting involved in any conflict that might cost American lives. He clearly thought he could win his battles with out putting troops in the Ground. How many times did he send million dollor missels into a ten dollor tents to kill targets that were no longer there? When U.S ground forces got hit hard in Somalia, Clinton tucked his tail between his legs and ran sending the clear message to the world that the U.S lacked the will to fight Some believe that all we have to do is be nice and the world will be nice back. I call those people fools. If you act like a coward the rest of the world will treat you like one

Just tell me where to send the check

Lets see what they look like in. Then I'll be able to give you a better, more informed, opinion.

Are you O.K. Did you bump your head?

Instead of shooting animals, I think it would be more fun to use paint ball guns and shoot actors dressed up as your least favorite politician. I'll bet a web page like that would do quite well. When some one make that happen remember that it was my idea.

Actually, not true. Because resources are infinitely more scarce on mars than they are on earth, over population would require far fewer people and the squabbling would begin. Back to square one

[ How's the St. Bernard & family? reply] Bigger than ever. I now have Three. I'll drop you a line. Kevin

We humans will never get to the point when wars are a distant memory. If we have no more wars then the planet will suffer from over population which, historically speaking, leads to more wars. Pessimistic? Perhaps. Realistic? With out a doubt. Like it or not war is here to stay just like Desease.

Well Duh!

Oh come on now! Stop being so uptight. You know you secretly want to join the Orgyforworldpeace. Count me in. WAAAAY in

See... Told you And that's what you call a valid explanation? Nope. Only of you

Religious sites are protected under the Geneva Conventions. However, the moment a shot is fired from there or the moment the enemy uses it as a safe haven, it becomes fair game according to the rules of war. Read it. That keeps getting funnier every time I read it. What is this? the 500th time some one has pointed out that little fact? but still the argument rages

Sorry, no standard U.S. Military bash on this one, Christel.... if they were attacking from the mosque, then it is no longer a place of worship but a place of war... I'd just say: They were "defending" from the mosque, right? Other way round, it's not that easy, w/o invadors and stuff... Correct me, if I missed something. Christel Wrong. It lost protected status when it was determined to be a weapons storage dump. ... says who? Proved who? See... Told you

How could that nut bag possibly have thought it was going to go well for him. Have to give him credit thou. kept dancing right to the end

Ding! Even the Geneva Convention specifies that once an offensive shot eminates from a protected building, it loses protected status. This is also why C-9s did not have any offesive weaps... Guys, haven't you figured out yet that you can never win this debate? No matter what you say, no matter how many facts you provide, the U.S. will always be in the wrong in the eyes of some.

This is a true story. In the last days of President Clintons administration, interior minister Bruce Babbot, at the behest of President Clinton, declared a large section of AZ to be a national wilderness area. It was named after a type of tree that is supposed to grow there and thus became the Ironwood national forest. The problem with this land grab was two fold. First, there are virtually no iron wood trees to be found anywhere in the area, and second, this new wilderness refuge surrounded several privately owned farms had been held by families for many generations. Most of these farms had substantial improvements made to the tune of several hundreds of thousands of dollars. When the surrounding area was declared a wilderness area, that meant that the farmers could no longer operate any mechanical equipment or work their fields and overnight, their land became worthless. While I'm sure the land grab was done with the best intentions, it ruined several families. Arizona was by no means the only state to see small farms and business steam rolled by President Clintons desire to be remembered as "The Environmental President." But to be fair, some of the land that was included around the country does deserve protecting but more thoughtful research needed to be done before random land grabs took place

How so? Many forestry experts believe that logging is actually beneficial to the health of forests. The last time I was in Yosemite, the Park Service was actually burning forest as part of its forest management plan. Most logging companies seem to be pretty sophisticated about their business since destroying forests benefits no one. The last I saw forests were a renewable resource. What many may not know (or are unwilling to accept), is that thinning a forrest (not clear cutting) is actually better for the health of the forrest. It reduces the risk of major conflagration (fire) removes diseased trees and allows more sun light to shine on the forrest floor which in turn allows other species of plant life to thrive.

He's not that sexy. Take my word for it

That could be next century. Without an impending ban, I still have over 1500 rounds of various calibers. Hello..... Calling all gun control advocates. Where are you??????? I'm dying to hear your thoughts on this issue

So much for taking guns away making people safer, huh? Blues, Nathan _________________________________________________ I;m betting things will level out once the criminals have run out of bullets

I'm eager to see what the gun control advocats twist on this will be.

True, but not hard to set off an IED. I can shoot while unarmed but your right it's usually hard

O.K. breath. take a moment and just breath.... There now isn't that better?

Perhaps you already have but why arent' you blasting the kids parents for letting him hang out with a man once accused of child molestation?