brenthutch

It will be interesting to see what happens with donations to the CGI. If they drop off we will know that the Clintons were peddling access.

I thought that was supposed to work this time around.

Massive losses in 2010 and 2012, lost the presidency and four more governors in 2016, lost more than 600 legislators in state government since 2008, their leadership is old and their bench is thin and 2018 does not look good for them either. They had better get their shit together, because one party rule is a disaster for our country.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/11/09/solar-wind-companies-see-stocks-fall-after-trump-win/

The markets don't agree with your assessment. DOW up 28 points.

I agree, the irony is just a thing of beauty.

You say that like it's a bad thing.

Legacy? What legacy? His executive orders will be gone within hours, and Obamacare will be denied its much needed lifeline.

The triumph of stupid over evil.

Head chopped off, chopper incident.

Best posted as a poll.

Yup after RNC operatives indicated the damage was done. True, the retraction never totally removes that initial impression. Just like when Harry Reid claimed that Romney never paid taxes. Hypocrisy all around.

FYI the metaphor mess up was ment to be illustrative

Mindless sheep. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ApcqXijVzYU

If Comey wanted everyone to think he was going all-out to support Trump, he couldn;t do a better job. LATEST: www.newsweek.com/fbi-releasing-documents-clinton-marc-rich-515921 You mean this guy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSRnfm0MFws&autoplay=1 If it does not load right away, hit pause then play Shows just what bad judge of character democrats are

Hey its a doggie dog world out there.

I meant exactly what I wrote. I have spent a lot of time in Texas over the years. Jerry Baumchen Austin obviously. Obviously. The city with the highest educational level in the state. And one of the few places in Texas where a cowboy metaphor would go sideways.

I meant exactly what I wrote. I have spent a lot of time in Texas over the years. Jerry Baumchen Austin obviously.

Always remember the "Carbone Zone" for good food and great stories. BSBD. Miss you

If Comey wanted everyone to think he was going all-out to support Trump, he couldn;t do a better job. LATEST: www.newsweek.com/fbi-releasing-documents-clinton-marc-rich-515921 You mean this guy? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nSRnfm0MFws&autoplay=1 If it does not load right away, hit pause then play

They have a saying Texas for rushmc's type of postings: All hat and no saddle. Jerry Baumchen I think you mean "All hat no cattle", you need to get out more.

Ah. So sitting on information detrimental to Trump - fine, nothing wrong here, he's just following the law. Sitting on information detrimental to Clinton - he has an OBLIGATION to break the law to drive her poll numbers down! Otherwise he might get in trouble for screwing up his own investigation. So we will put you down as opposing the rule of law when it helps your candidate. Trump is NOT my candidate, I challenge you to find anything other than negative comments on Trump by me.

"If Mr. Comey had sat on the information — with part of the country already voting in the presidential election — he would have not only made the F.B.I. more of a target for partisan fury, but also made himself a target for future House investigations, since he had testified under oath that the F.B.I. had completed its Clinton email investigation." http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/31/opinion/why-clintons-emails-matter.html?_r=0

He testified under oath that his investigation was completed, he further testified that if that status was changed that he would inform the relevant committee chairs and ranking members. He did what he was required to do to keep from perjuring himself.

What is more important, departmental norms, or the rule of law?