kallend 1,648 #376 August 16, 2015 AnvilbrotherI don't It isn't I just want acknowledgment that if those rule apply to watts It is the same for gore. That is all. So WHO here is quoting Gore? No-one! Your comments about Gore are all moot.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #377 August 16, 2015 Ok fine, next time someone mentions hillary lying about Benghazi don't open your mouth about bush lying about the war because no one is talking about bush, and your comments about bush are all moot. See how that works. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
brenthutch 388 #378 August 17, 2015 Boosh! Medicine taste bad! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,648 #379 August 17, 2015 AnvilbrotherOk fine, next time someone mentions hillary lying about Benghazi don't open your mouth about bush lying about the war because no one is talking about bush, and your comments about bush are all moot. See how that works. Still WHOOSH. You simply can't comprehend the issue. Is it REALLY necessary to spell it out for you in words of one syllable?... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #380 August 17, 2015 The issue is you refuse to apply the same labels to liberals as others. The fact of anyone linking to him was your afterthought to change the direction. I brought it up straight to your face to see if you would label gore the same you would watts. I initially never said anything about you or anyone else using him as information. This was a side argument not related to information linking specifically by anyone but about a label you placed on watts because he is biased, and has no degrees in the field. The same as gore. You can't take an issue head on can you, you always try to twist the argument or move the goalposts when you are wrong, or are up against having to do something you do not want to do. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,259 #381 August 17, 2015 Hey Anvil, before you get too high and mighty you might want to check back to post #367 where Kallend said "I don't quote Gore because he's clearly biased". Isn't that exactly what you wanted from him? Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #382 August 17, 2015 jakee Hey Anvil, before you get too high and mighty you might want to check back to post #367 where Kallend said "I don't quote Gore because he's clearly biased". Isn't that exactly what you wanted from him? Do you really expect a cogent argument from that quarter??? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #383 August 17, 2015 Explain the need for post #397 then. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #384 August 17, 2015 AnvilbrotherExplain the need for post #397 then. Perhaps when we get to #397 us mere mortals will discern that.. but my futurescope does not seem to be as well used as yours Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,259 #385 August 17, 2015 AnvilbrotherExplain the need for post #397 then. Who knows? Hopefully you'll be discussing an issue by then, and won't still be trying to bash Kallend for not saying something he's already said.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,435 #386 August 17, 2015 >Ok fine, next time someone mentions hillary lying about Benghazi don't >your mouth about bush lying about the war because no one is talking about >bush, and your comments about bush are all moot. But that's not what you did. In your example, when someone mentions Bush lying about the war, you would demand that they defend what Bill Clinton did. Because he's a democrat. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,648 #387 August 17, 2015 AnvilbrotherExplain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amazon 7 #388 August 17, 2015 kallend***Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. Because 'Murica Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Coreeece 2 #389 August 17, 2015 kallend***Explain the need for post #397 then. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. Only if you played the fireball...Never was there an answer....not without listening, without seeing - Gilmour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,259 #390 August 17, 2015 Zing! Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #391 August 17, 2015 kallend***Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. #379. Obvious to see it was a typo if you even tried to have an honest discussion. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,648 #392 August 17, 2015 Anvilbrother******Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. #379. Obvious to see it was a typo if you even tried to have an honest discussion. Not our fault if you can't express yourself properly.... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #393 August 17, 2015 Yea I am so sure you took the time to go hmm there is no post that high, he was replying to me, so let me take a 3 second scroll to see if the number was just mixed up so I can reply........ Nopeeee I am going to just be sarcastic and vile some more and exercise a snotty liberal persona. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
billvon 2,435 #394 August 18, 2015 >Nopeeee I am going to just be sarcastic and vile some more and exercise a >snotty liberal persona. "You can't take an issue head on can you" " . . . if you even tried to have an honest discussion" "you are not a better person by being a grammar nazi while dodging the issues" "He couldn't handle this. " People who live in glass houses and all that. He is replying to you in the same snotty persona. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Anvilbrother 0 #395 August 18, 2015 I have said it before I am as polite and nice as can be until the other poster starts getting salty(search if you wish). Go back and see how that started. You know what fuck that don't worry about it. He isn't worth any more wasted electrons or ad revenue for this website. Postes r made from an iPad or iPhone. Spelling and gramhair mistakes guaranteed move along, Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,259 #396 August 18, 2015 Anvilbrother******Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. #379. Obvious to see it was a typo if you even tried to have an honest discussion. Yes, obviously it was a typo. But as a numerical typo, unlike misspelling a word, it was impossible to know what you meant. It could have been any number, so why not have a little fun with it? It's hardly a reflection on honesty. Anyway, why #397? Because you were still being a dick even though he'd already said what you were bashing him for not saying? Seems like one of the few places where "WOOOSH" actually fits.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jakee 1,259 #397 August 18, 2015 AnvilbrotherI have said it before I am as polite and nice as can be until the other poster starts getting salty(search if you wish). Go back and see how that started. You know what fuck that don't worry about it. He isn't worth any more wasted electrons or ad revenue for this website. Yeah, you can say it but it doesn't make it true.Do you want to have an ideagasm? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
turtlespeed 212 #398 August 18, 2015 kallend***Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. It will look just like this I'm not usually into the whole 3-way thing, but you got me a little excited with that. - Skymama BTR #1 / OTB^5 Official #2 / Hellfish #408 / VSCR #108/Tortuga/Orfun Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,648 #399 August 18, 2015 turtlespeed ******Explain the need for post #397 then. You have a time machine? I'd like to know what is going to be said in post 397. Also some winning lottery numbers. Thanks. It will look just like this ... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kallend 1,648 #400 August 21, 2015 in.reuters.com/article/2015/08/20/climatechange-temperature-usa-idINL1N10V1PY20150820 www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201507... The only sure way to survive a canopy collision is not to have one. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
